CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2014, 08:48:52 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97153 Posts in 11687 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25
331  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Convertible Rear Speaker on: July 22, 2011, 09:12:35 PM
Mark - can you actually hear anything when the top is down?
332  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: LA/Norwood shipping on: July 18, 2011, 01:09:19 PM
Pull a vehicle history report from the federal database. That report will list the first state and date it was titled in and any "brands" such as salvage or total loss that were assigned to that vin since its birth..
333  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Firewall picture on: July 17, 2011, 06:51:08 AM
In the 69 AIM there is an overview of the firewall and marks all the factory holes listed by option if I remember correct.
334  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Rally Wheel Trim Rings - Measurements? Original? on: July 14, 2011, 01:11:46 PM
Steve - When I purchased my Z11 back in 82 it still had two of the original style so called "suicide rings", and two post recalled rings.
I turned the originals in for two additional replacement rings in 82 at no charge, since they looked bad in appearance (dented and pitted) and kept arriving in the driveway before the car did. Smiley The replacement ring for the 14 x 7 back in 82 was GM part number  9796919. I think they are discontinued from GM but are on Flea-Bait all the time. They are 3 inches deep, 1 inch rim width and are 15 and 1/2 inches in diameter. There is a paper sticker with 900928-9796919 on the inside rim edge but no stampings I can see. They arrived in a standard late 70's early 80's brown GM box, each ring was sealed in a bluish poly bag with GM corp logos. As for being original design, some say yes some say no. I say it is what GM put out as a replacement so in my mind that makes it corporate correct for post recall acquirement. And in my mind I would never drive again with the suicide ones installed just to dangerous and a pain to keep running after. I don't do contours shows so I don't care cause they look damn good.

The original style clips that GM used were redesigned after the transportation safety board forced a recall because the rings would fly off the wheel, or "kill themselves" on cornering under quite normal circumstances. These flying rings had caused a great number of accidents as people tried to avoid the 80 plus mph ring flying at them. The post recall design had stronger clips all around the ring and deeper into the ring, suicide style only had four (I think) right close to the outer edge so as the wheel flexed in a turn the ring popped off.  

Once you put the replacements on you won't want to remove them (and that is a difficult task anyway) but you will see what they do to the surface of the wheel as the new style clips dig in and stay.  

I didn't notice any physical difference in size or ring depth between the two versions on mine when I started my restoration but then again I was new to all this and wasn't so interested documenting something like a trim ring so no photos were taken of the old rings. What type of clips do you have on your rings?

From over at Team Camaro -
Originally Posted by Mark C

There are two types of Rally wheel trim rings used in 69 according to the 1972 GM P&A 30A parts manual.

3934892 - 1969/ALL WITH 14 IN STD WHEEL /OPTION P06/196971/ALL WITH 14 IN RALLY WHEEL /OPTION ZJ7/ EXC 350 /300 HP/ AND 396 ENGINE

9796919 - 1969-70/ALL WITH 14 IN RALLY WHEEL /OPTION ZJ7/ WITH 350 /300 HP/ AND 396 ENGINE 1969/ALL WITH 14 IN SUPER SPORT WHEEL /OPTION N66/


So that confirms the part number is right for my 350/300 L48 so I'm ok. You should be too since it was also used on the 396
335  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Courtesy Lights on: July 14, 2011, 07:01:13 AM
this may sound like a dumb reply here but did you check to see if the headlight switch rheostat isn't clicked over to light the dome lights?
336  Site Comments / Discussion / Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Quesiton to site moderator or managers on: July 11, 2011, 06:21:24 AM
Smiley
Thanks
337  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: RS Headlight Door Trouble AGAIN... on: July 10, 2011, 02:52:35 PM
Here is the reason for the 3/8" gap on the right headlight door. Its amazing how these cars can make fools out of you. The slop on the canister bracket bolt holes and the slight change in mounting position didn't allow the piston to pull the door shut.

Thanks for the help guys!
over 40 years of wear always wins. Smiley
338  Site Comments / Discussion / Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Quesiton to site moderator or managers on: July 09, 2011, 11:55:55 PM
Hey Kurt - it only happens when you post a picture larger then the limit, like dumping straight from an iphone.
Sometimes you get the error message but sometimes you do not - the session is just toast.
My68ss reported it a while back http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=7422.0
maybe a java issue?

Brian

339  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Mirror on: July 09, 2011, 06:05:28 PM
I believe all 68 & 69 mirrors were rectangular with rounded corners.
Round mirrors on a 67.
340  Site Comments / Discussion / Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Quesiton to site moderator or managers on: July 09, 2011, 04:26:01 PM
I have found with Fire Fox 4x and Internet Explorer 8x that If you try to post or reply and attach photos and the pictures are too large you get an error, but from this point forward the browser session is dead. You have to close the browser tab and reload the forum, then select the thread and try your post or reply again.
341  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: RS Headlight Door Trouble AGAIN... on: July 09, 2011, 12:24:45 AM
mine and anybody else who says "wow you got yours to work? Can you fix mine too?" LOL
342  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: L48'S WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE on: July 09, 2011, 12:20:01 AM
69Pace  Is that a hood lock with a internal hood release cable in the bottom pic?

It is a lock and ignition cut off.
Uses a barrel lock key mounted under the dash.
Push it in it kills the ignition and locks the hood.
I used to drive her to work every day in a less then pseudo safe neighborhood.
It was the best solution while I figured out if I was going to install a remote key-less entry and alarm once the restoration was finished.
That was 29 years ago LOL
343  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: RS Headlight Door Trouble AGAIN... on: July 07, 2011, 06:54:32 PM
Brian,

Thanks for outlining the proper way to lube the actuator. Nice to know there are rubber boot repops available. Guess I will have to research them as Jack brings up a good point. As you can see, mine have seen their better days.

http://secure.classichq.com/68-69-RS-ACTUATOR-RUBBER-BOOT-ONLY-P486.aspx $7.95

http://www.rickscamaros.com/camaro-headlight-door-vacuum-actuator-shaft-dust-boot-rally-sport-rs-1968-1969.html $8.99

344  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: RS Headlight Door Trouble AGAIN... on: July 07, 2011, 06:48:10 PM
I bought mine last in 1982 NOS GM on the shelf at Bristol's Chevrolet.

Classic HQ is making a reliable replacement that has a 1 year warranty and come pretested. Uses new tooling, and quality steel. $84.95  
http://secure.classichq.com/68-69-RS-HEADLAMP-VACUUM-ACTUATOR--P485C59.aspx

Rick's also selling these new tooling versions from Classic HQ but cheaper at $79.99. http://www.rickscamaros.com/camaro-headlight-door-vacuum-actuator-rally-sport-rs-1968-1969.html

Classic Industries sells a different tooling replacement manufactured by/for OER - no warranty, $79.99. And we all have our opinions of the quality of any OER product.

But a fresh set of hoses, good vacuum from your intake manifold, new or rebuilt hose bib on the headlight switch, lubed bell-cranks, and silicone lubed canisters, and PJ on the pistons and sealed dust boots make the doors as quick, and reliable as a vacuum system can be.

I love the mechanical pace of the doors on a 68 or 69 vacuum system. I find the electric conversion units too quick, and way too loud to fit the late 60's vibe of the car's design. Smiley

As to the binding situation I would check the piston connection and make sue the clip its making contact with anything, could the hose have gotten in the way? Basically look at everything you took off and put back on.
345  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: L48'S WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE on: July 07, 2011, 06:07:06 PM
Engine bay needs a little spit and polish and maybe paint.

Date: 03B
VIN: 124679N6161xx
Stamp: can't be read from the ground will revise once it is on a lift and my near sighted eyes can focus on it.  Grin  
Paint: 50 Top: A
Z11 Pace Car with Muncie 4 Speed
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.096 seconds with 18 queries.