CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 01, 2014, 11:21:04 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104994 Posts in 12266 Topics by 4728 Members
Latest Member: MartySS
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 21, 2014, 06:03:21 PM
Kurt - picture of car exterior is shown in the second post on page 1 of this thread
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 21, 2014, 03:13:32 PM
I emailed the full size picture over to Kurt for posting - should bring a lot of clarity to the stamp pad. 
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 20, 2014, 07:43:27 PM
this guy saved everything - smog, original air cleaner.  Says that cowl plenum came in the trunk when new?
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 20, 2014, 07:41:21 PM
sorry that it's upside down.  Here's the car
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 20, 2014, 07:38:19 PM
I spent some time with the owner of this car at a show today.  He says that it's original engine.  I haven't studied a lot of SB stamps.  What do the experts think?  It's a cool car - RS, factory cowl plenum, 42k original miles, factory docs., original panels.

6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 10, 2014, 04:17:40 PM
HMMMM - It's an odd thing (to me) that 250,000 Camaros were ordered and not one with MA6 in any engine?  Are you sure that the engine production statistics aren't homologated under the most common engine+trans ECL?  Again - not a biggie - I'm certain of what I saw, but can't explain the contradiction???
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 10, 2014, 05:16:49 AM
It was in a car Kurt - I don't believe that I looked for a VIN stamp because it was just a 396/325 motor & dated wrong for the car that it was in.  It didn't have a CE stamp. Original looking stamp though - who re-stamps a 396/325 just for HD clutch?  The owner wasn't even aware of the significance of "JU".  I'm just trying to add to the conversation here guys - I did not take a picture of the block. 
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 09, 2014, 07:43:47 PM
"none known" is different then "none produced"  -  I have seen a factory JU coded block
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 09, 2014, 06:20:53 AM
What are you referring to with the "no cars were built" Kurt?  I know that I have seen "JU" coded blocks.  Maybe you referenced "KE" coded blocks?
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: technical articles by JohnZ on: August 10, 2014, 05:16:26 PM
They really are great - John has contributed soooo much to our hobby.  I just read the foundry article & could add just a couple of points of interest from the perspective of the Tonawanda Metal Casting Plant (where I worked for part of my time at GM).  The shape of the center screw on the "clock" definitely had significance at Tonawanda.  First shift castings had a "flat" center screw, and second shift castings had a "round" head on the screw.  Also, the position of the clock pointer indicated the actual hour of the day (not the hour of the shift).   Some GM foundries (like CFD) utilized two "clocks" on their patterns - one indicated "D" or "N" for the shift, and the other indicated the time of day.
11  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9N665455 on: July 21, 2014, 06:08:44 AM
The original owner sent me a copy of his 1969 MD title - says that he has a folder full of docs on the car.  He sold it 2/4/71 and hasn't seen it since that time.
12  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / 9N665455 on: July 20, 2014, 05:43:02 PM
I was at a car show today and one of the participants mentioned that he had docs for a 1969 Camaro that he bought new.  Just thought that I'd post the VIN to see if the car is still around.
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Farewell And The Best For Ed! on: July 07, 2014, 04:21:20 AM
I hope Ed takes a brief respite and comes back as a contributor to this site.  Hate to lose his knowledge. 
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Camaros at AACA Grand Nationals Last Friday on: June 17, 2014, 05:31:20 AM
I'll have my usual 3 spaces in the car corral (new system this year - so I don't know the numbers yet).  Also a car in judging on Saturday. 
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Camaros at AACA Grand Nationals Last Friday on: June 15, 2014, 08:16:31 PM
Grand National was in Moline last year
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 18 queries.