CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 25, 2014, 02:16:10 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105762 Posts in 12346 Topics by 4757 Members
Latest Member: chelltab
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 772 fans and unstamped fans on: October 17, 2014, 08:55:36 PM
Big Block is the short shaft
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 772 fans and unstamped fans on: October 17, 2014, 08:15:11 AM
short shaft = 1 3/8"   Long shaft = 1 5/8"   Big blocks often need every bit of that 1/4" difference!
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 772 fans and unstamped fans on: October 15, 2014, 05:42:26 AM
Z-28 is longer shaft and BB is shorter shaft - right?  These are all dated in the Jan-June '69 time frame.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Going to Hershey? on: October 12, 2014, 06:07:05 AM
Too bad that it rained on Saturday, but I've seen a LOT worse weather at Hershey!  Wednesday through Friday were great.  I got to meet a few of you CRG guys at my car corral spots (thanks for stopping).  Finally wound up judging Mustangs on Saturday - gotta love AACA.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Going to Hershey? on: October 06, 2014, 06:14:50 AM
Yes, yes, and yes again.  Spots C54-C56 in car corral.  Showing in class 36C, and judging class 36B (first choice).
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is there a updated register on Z10 on: October 03, 2014, 06:34:15 AM
How about the number of big block Z11s accounted for Kurt?
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 21, 2014, 06:03:21 PM
Kurt - picture of car exterior is shown in the second post on page 1 of this thread
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 21, 2014, 03:13:32 PM
I emailed the full size picture over to Kurt for posting - should bring a lot of clarity to the stamp pad. 
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 20, 2014, 07:43:27 PM
this guy saved everything - smog, original air cleaner.  Says that cowl plenum came in the trunk when new?
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 20, 2014, 07:41:21 PM
sorry that it's upside down.  Here's the car
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 20, 2014, 07:38:19 PM
I spent some time with the owner of this car at a show today.  He says that it's original engine.  I haven't studied a lot of SB stamps.  What do the experts think?  It's a cool car - RS, factory cowl plenum, 42k original miles, factory docs., original panels.

12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 10, 2014, 04:17:40 PM
HMMMM - It's an odd thing (to me) that 250,000 Camaros were ordered and not one with MA6 in any engine?  Are you sure that the engine production statistics aren't homologated under the most common engine+trans ECL?  Again - not a biggie - I'm certain of what I saw, but can't explain the contradiction???
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 10, 2014, 05:16:49 AM
It was in a car Kurt - I don't believe that I looked for a VIN stamp because it was just a 396/325 motor & dated wrong for the car that it was in.  It didn't have a CE stamp. Original looking stamp though - who re-stamps a 396/325 just for HD clutch?  The owner wasn't even aware of the significance of "JU".  I'm just trying to add to the conversation here guys - I did not take a picture of the block. 
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 09, 2014, 07:43:47 PM
"none known" is different then "none produced"  -  I have seen a factory JU coded block
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch on: September 09, 2014, 06:20:53 AM
What are you referring to with the "no cars were built" Kurt?  I know that I have seen "JU" coded blocks.  Maybe you referenced "KE" coded blocks?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 18 queries.