CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 18, 2014, 04:36:37 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107456 Posts in 12500 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 [54] 55 56 ... 103
796  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: HAPPY NEW YEAR on: January 02, 2014, 12:38:42 AM
so do you have the body back together after cleaning it?
797  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 45th anniversary of the first Z-28 on: January 02, 2014, 12:36:59 AM
I assume the original 302 was long gone, but what other original components did you get with the car?
798  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: my 1969 z28 on: January 02, 2014, 12:22:01 AM
No console, 08C car has the tach and center fuel gauge. I am thinking the home page on CRG probably shows what options included that grab bar
799  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: my 1969 z28 on: January 01, 2014, 11:12:24 PM
Well my car has very little options, but does have the grab bar. On the invoice it says "special interior group" My car also has wood on the steering wheel and dash, and has the stainless trim around the pedals.
800  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: CAMARO Performers Jan. '14 issue pg. 16 on: January 01, 2014, 04:18:56 PM
What kind of car is that behind the Camaro # 18 looks like a different body.
801  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: HAPPY NEW YEAR on: January 01, 2014, 04:06:18 PM
Gary is yours going to be on the road this spring?
802  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 45th anniversary of the first Z-28 on: January 01, 2014, 03:44:18 PM
Hey Jon any recent pics of your car? (Happy new year!)
803  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: HELP: Conflicting 1969 Camaro Powertrain REAR AXLE Availablities on: January 01, 2014, 03:36:45 PM
You can't have an economy gear lower than 2.56.
And specs changed during the year. The Z couldn't get a 4.10 later in the year.
I wasn't aware that the 4.10 wasn't available at one point. When did they remove that option?
804  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: factory race parts on: December 30, 2013, 12:40:09 PM
Very cool. Did it start off as a 67 Z/28, and then get modified through the years? It must be a task to find a vintage race car that remained in good condition. it seems like a car that turned into a racer early on would get beat on and hacked up a bit more every time it passes to a new owner.
805  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: factory race parts on: December 30, 2013, 01:11:18 AM
is your avatar of a original trans am racer, or is this a car you may have made to go to the track with?
806  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original fan belt on: December 30, 2013, 01:01:41 AM
When judging do you compile any original pictures of certain parts to compare against future cars if there is questionability with a particular part or area of a particular car? I just thought you must see the best of the best, so a picture reference book of originality may be a tool possibly.
807  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original fan belt on: December 29, 2013, 12:32:18 AM
Chick, I knew you guys would have some old relic of a judging book from back in the day. "What a great group of guys" that can go back in time and find resources like that... Cheesy
808  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original fan belt on: December 28, 2013, 01:22:17 PM
Hey Chick I recently saw that auction for that replacement belt as well, ( I also saved the pics), thanks for posting the pics. Hans and JKZ have had the raised original belts, which made me think the raised was assembly line correct. Is it any different for 67 or 68, did they use exclusively one style from the factory?
809  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust Manifold #s on: December 27, 2013, 01:54:40 PM
Charley, awesome gesture.

I agree.  Smiley
X2
810  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Original fan belt on: December 27, 2013, 01:37:30 PM
Hey guys, I am trying to figure out what the original part number for the 1969 Z/28 fan/alternator/smog belt is. I see in the AIM it says for a sbc with a manual it is GM3883248, but then see the repop guys list a part number GM3932457, although I didn't find this in the AIM.
In addition to the part number I am also trying to figure out what is assembly line correct. I have seen 2 versions of GM belts, ones that have the GM number stamped/pressed in , and have also seen the part number raised off of the belt in a crisp font. See pic (Thank you Hans for digging those out)
Hans pic of his belts came off a 69 Los Angeles car, not sure if the Norwood parts bin would be the same, or if there was an earlier and later version of the belt(s).
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 [54] 55 56 ... 103
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.099 seconds with 19 queries.