CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 31, 2015, 12:37:27 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109331 Posts in 12659 Topics by 4866 Members
Latest Member: jamejia1967
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 85 86 [87] 88 89 ... 109
1291  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: I found a Sequoia Green Z28 with air plenum 9 k miles ! on: August 08, 2013, 01:28:41 PM
sounds good, post a picture of the interior with those gauges! (please)
1292  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: I found a Sequoia Green Z28 with air plenum 9 k miles ! on: August 08, 2013, 01:15:39 PM
Now I understand, that car looks sweet in the drive way with the early torq thrusts. Still surprises me to see so many unrestored cars without the console gauges factory, it seems like more of the track oriented cars did not have them. Maybe they ran a set of mechanical stewart warner gauges instead.
1293  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: I found a Sequoia Green Z28 with air plenum 9 k miles ! on: August 08, 2013, 12:00:41 PM
are these pics before or after the resto?
1294  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 08, 2013, 11:22:23 AM
great pictures Gary. Very detailed. I wish I had your resizing skills
1295  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 1969 documentation list - updated 2/25/2013 on: August 08, 2013, 04:51:16 AM
I took the time and added all the loose POP's to the list. About 500 cars on the list.

Where do you or the CRG discover all this documentation from time to time? I know we all appreciate it.
thanks
1296  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cable Motor Support on: August 08, 2013, 03:03:47 AM
he may of, he was just very particular about the car. He documented every mile and fill up, and for the last 5 years he owned it anytime he started it up he took notes.....BUT .I can tell you that I have had it humming at 7k and loved it. ( I do still document every mile in his original journal) why break with tradition , ya know?
1297  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cable Motor Support on: August 06, 2013, 11:04:48 PM
The original owner of my car was so worried about it, besides having the the factory recall one installed, he also had them install a cable on the passenger side! The ironic part of it, is the guy baby-ied the car so much he probably never had the rpms past 4k...lol
1298  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 spare wheel on: August 06, 2013, 11:00:29 PM
sorry I din't mean to hijack this thread, just trying to learn.
Well unless they added it after the inspection, it was not noted int he report.
1299  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 OEM AM antenna question. on: August 06, 2013, 10:57:55 PM
My Original 08C am antenna mast does not have a grove. Maybe it was a vendor change mid year?
1300  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Took my 69 to its original owner for a visit on: August 06, 2013, 10:14:10 PM
great pics, good story. Welcome to the site!
1301  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 'yellow light' AM/FM radio? on: August 06, 2013, 08:32:20 PM
So the U69 were yellow light only then? thanks for filling in the blanks about the 2 radios. It is interesting that both had 2 different colors yellow and blue versus the rest of the dash lights which use more of a greenish  hue.
1302  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 'yellow light' AM/FM radio? on: August 06, 2013, 02:32:34 PM
This is also mentioned in John Hoopers book The 1969 Camaro reference book, along with how many were sold( 8271 yellow, vs 2359 blue). The yellow also had a different option number of RPO U69, and the blue was RPO U79. It might be a handy book to have in your library.
John Hoopers book covers some different aspects than Jerrys, I wouldn't say one is better than the other, most of the info is similar of coarse, but Hoopers book has some neat little tid bits, like the RS option added almost 30lbs to the curb weight of the car along with many other interesting options and facts. You may find it a good read as well.
1303  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Build sheet vs. "IBM" on: August 06, 2013, 11:12:01 AM
So kind of out of the norm to run across one it sounds like?
1304  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Build sheet vs. "IBM" on: August 05, 2013, 09:08:35 PM
Someone in the know please elaborate on what these cards were for (substitute for build sheet?) and what did GM need them for once the car was delivered? maybe a confirmation to go with the statement of origin paper?
1305  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heartbeat City reputation on: August 05, 2013, 06:49:59 PM
sure repro would make more sense, but seems like repop gets used more often. Same thing though reproduced parts
Pages: 1 ... 85 86 [87] 88 89 ... 109
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 19 queries.