CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 27, 2015, 05:18:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
111322 Posts in 12819 Topics by 4913 Members
Latest Member: devodave
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17
226  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Looking for 9N606612 on: March 29, 2011, 05:57:02 AM
Good luck in your search. I hope you find your car.. I know my search is like looking for a needle dropped in the middle of the Atlantic ocean...But one thing I can say about classic cars, is that you do meet a lot of nice people...Yes, I have encountered a few jerks along the way (heck I might even be one of them to some people) but all in all the folks that work to restore cars can be the most helpful people when you really need help in finding something...

This site has already been helpful in finding 9N606512..I never thought I would have found this motor when I started looking at the car I just bought. But guess what, I did and it was here on CRG.

Eddie
227  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Looking for 9N606612 on: March 28, 2011, 08:46:52 PM
So here's the story...

Car # 1 9N606612 was originally sold in the York PA. area many years ago and the current owner of car # 1 bought it without a motor...The owner looked for the original motor but to no avail..

Car # 2 9N606512 was originally sold in Lenoir NC and was sold to the third owner in 2008 without a motor as well..However, the motor for car 2 was posted and sold on e-bay. The motor from car # 2 was bought by car # 1 owner since it was built during the same week as car # 2..

In my communication to the owner of car # 1 he said that he did not want to sell the motor which is now in car # 1. The challenge to me was, if you can find the original motor 9N606612 then car owner # 1would consider trading motor 9N606512 so both cars would have the correct match # motors ...I am now the fourth owner of car # 2. So I'm thinking with the internet and sites like this one lets see where this gets me...

Both cars 1 and 2 are restored cars but what a story it would be if both the original motors could be returned to the correct vehicle.
I hope this helps to clear up this story somewhat and what I'm trying to accomplish ....
Eddie
228  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Looking for 9N606612 on: March 26, 2011, 09:59:39 AM
This is not the motor I'm looking for..I have research this and I know the history regarding this motor..Thanks for your efforts though. And I should buy a lottery ticket  the MEGA million is up to $325M this w/e..
Eddie
229  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Looking for 9N606612 on: March 24, 2011, 07:19:47 PM
I have been given a challenge to see if I can find the where abouts of a 1969 Z/28 motor. Wow !!! What a challenge..With the knowledge of this site someone must know the where abouts of this motor...The motor was removed from the car many years ago. It could be stored in someones garage, in a car or even in the cast iron gave yard..A starting point would be that the car was originally from York Pa and the motor was removed while the car was still in the York PA area the best we know...If you know the where abouts of this motor from an 02D please chime in...
TooManyReels
230  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 302 Compression Ratio on: March 16, 2011, 08:05:47 PM
So is Cam 2 fuel or higher octane required for these motors if driven on the street today..If so, that going to be an expensive ride,,,

TMR
231  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 302 Compression Ratio on: March 15, 2011, 08:03:51 PM
Thank you...That would have been my guess, but I was just not sure...
TMR...
232  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 302 Compression Ratio on: March 15, 2011, 07:28:36 PM
What was the factory compression ratio on a 1969 302, 10:01 or 11:01?
TMR
233  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Will it Fit on: February 28, 2011, 06:45:41 PM
Thanks for your help on this..This trailer has a curved nose on it, so I think it will be OK..I found out today that the 1969 camaro is about 16 ft. long which will work great for my application...

TMR
234  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Will it Fit on: February 27, 2011, 06:07:03 PM
Will a 1967 thru 69 Camaro fit in a 20' Haulmark enlosed trailer with a (PS) side door..I have a limited turn around area in my driveway and anything much bigger then this and  I want be able to turn it around to unload it or will my trunk be able to pull it...Its tight right now with my 20' open top trailer, but my little 63 Nova SS does not take up all that much of a foot print on the trialer....I'm gussing it will fit but would like a second opinion...

TMR
235  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Helping a Guy Out on: February 18, 2011, 10:43:37 PM
I will double check the build date again I may have wrote it down or guess once I got my notes home...Its an ageing thing or just cant read my hand writing anymore...

Thanks for the input though...I'll try and go over tomorrow and look at it again...

TMR...
236  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Helping a Guy Out on: February 17, 2011, 06:55:04 PM
I went to see a guy today that has a 1969 Z28 Vin.# 12437N663446 with the following cowl tag info..
Trim 711
06B 
12437NOR357740
code 52-52

This is all the all the info I could find on the car without putting it on a lift. It looks like the motor as either been replaced or the block decked..The partial vin # and build dates are gone..

He bought this car from someone that had lived in Rockwell Texas..Anyone knowing anything about this car my friend would like to know...I looked at this car because we said he wanted sell it so I thought I would check it out...The body of the car looks to be in great shape and the paint is very nice as well, it would be a great car if anyone is looking.  This car would clean up very nicely and could be a daily driver.  He belives it to have a 3:73...The car is now painted a British Green (I think) with Black Interior which is in great shape..If you want his contact info just let me know...
TooManyReels
237  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 1969 documentation list - updated 1/19/2011 on: February 03, 2011, 09:15:53 PM
Are these partial vin numbers missing a digit...I thought the partial vin # had 9 numbers and letters..What am I missing..?
TMR's
238  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Car Vin# and Cowl Tag Info on: February 02, 2011, 07:39:37 PM
I'm hoping to be able to find that out tomorrow...

Eddie
239  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Car Vin# and Cowl Tag Info on: February 01, 2011, 07:46:19 PM
Not that is matters, but here is how I came up with 652...End of Feb. Vin.# 607164 minus the car vin number 606512 = # 652  from the last week..And you are correct 17444/4=4361 car/week...
TMR's
240  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Car Vin# and Cowl Tag Info on: January 31, 2011, 09:23:27 PM
I used the end of Jan. month vin numbers 589720 and the end of Feb vin number 607164 and ran the numbes from there,,,Let me know if this is the wrong way of doing this...I got the numbers from the production vin code list post on the home page..

TMR's
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.393 seconds with 18 queries.