CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 25, 2014, 10:17:07 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105769 Posts in 12347 Topics by 4759 Members
Latest Member: RSSSFanatic
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Big Block Distributor Hold Down Clamp on: July 18, 2013, 01:46:07 PM
My '67 10B LOS L-30 has the wire clamp. FWIW
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Throttle arm attachment? on: July 13, 2013, 11:16:05 AM
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: upper and lower control arm finishes on: June 29, 2013, 09:13:06 PM
X2 on the paint under the bushing flange, and in the holes, on my '67's control arms. Just wondering if the bushings were installed after paint, and left unpainted. I noted the picture of the survivor car is missing the lock washer that goes under the end bolt (unless that changes after 67), along with what looks like paint on the fuel line.

  Are you saying you do not paint all parts at the control arms when doing a restoration?
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 0 rocker arms BIG or small 0 ? differences? on: May 02, 2013, 01:57:02 PM
It's always best to keep mated running parts together, as they develop wear patterns at the mating surfaces, such as a flat tappett does at the cam lobe, (which should not be mixed up, if you intend to reuse).  In the case of the pivots for the rockers, it's note quite so important, as long as there are no signs of discoloring, scratches / scoring, which you can "catch with your fingernail". JMO
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Starter Solenoid Numbers ?? on: May 01, 2013, 10:01:39 PM
The 1107320 starter was used in '65 Corvette small block applications, and yours appears to be produced June 24 of 1964. I would try the GM parts wiki for the complete application usage, while the second starter appears to be built in 66, September 8th, not sure of application, others will chime in soon.
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: '67 accelerator return spring: was there a bracket? on: April 17, 2013, 06:30:26 PM
 I found one for the '68 327 / 350 (it's different than the '67). The part your looking for seems to be associated with'67 only (Camaro and Chevelle) 327 and 350's. Good luck in your search, as I don't believe they repro it.
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: '67 accelerator return spring: was there a bracket? on: April 17, 2013, 03:25:48 PM
Here you go.
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: '67 accelerator return spring: was there a bracket? on: April 17, 2013, 02:44:58 PM
Yes, the '67 sb V8 has such a part, I would be happy to supply a picture if you need it, as the GM Parts WIKI has an incorrect drawing of the part. I don't know where to get one, but will look around to see if I have an additional one.
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: What carb date for my 06A early June Z on: April 14, 2013, 03:05:49 PM
The pic shows the distributor in place, and I believe it was shipped to the dress line as such, but John will give you the definative answer on that.
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: 10 Bolt Posi on: April 10, 2013, 11:20:34 AM
I believe you may have removed the retainer in the bearing itself, as stated earlier, there are no snap rings to hold the bearing into the housing. JMO
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Dimpled Carb Studs on: January 08, 2013, 08:03:41 PM
I believe Chick is showing the stud at the carb's center, while the other studs are for attaching the carb to the manifold. JMO
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 327 oil filter bypass valve on: January 06, 2013, 03:49:15 PM
  It simply allows the oil to bypass the filter if it becomes restricted / plugged, in an effort to minimize catastrophic engine damages. There is only a single spring loaded disc that becomes dislodged from excess pressure, allowing the oil to bypass the filter cartridge. I've never seen one go bad, as it's a very simple design, with one moving part. The spin on oil filter adapters usually do not have this valve, as the filter has the bypass incorporated in it, while the old style paper cartridge does not have this provision. Many people use the spin on filter adapters, and plug the port for a check valve, when using a high pressure / high volume oil pump. Hope this helps to explain the function of the check valve.
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Rear Wheel Well Plugs - Before or After Undercoating? on: December 19, 2012, 03:25:47 PM
Not sure on the '68s, but my '67 showed no evidence of undercoating at the plugs. That's not to say it didn't come off in the last 40+ years, but I see no indications of having been sprayed. JMO
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruse control on a 68 camaro on: December 16, 2012, 09:34:12 PM
Email sent.
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: where can I send my water pump to get rebuilt on: December 16, 2012, 09:19:59 PM
I purchased a rebuild kit from Zip's (corvette repro site), and rebuilt mine. As mentioned, be sure of your dimensions before starting the rebuild, instructions come with the kit, as well as the special arbor for use in the press. Good luck if you go this route.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.118 seconds with 18 queries.