CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 24, 2014, 11:17:00 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105759 Posts in 12346 Topics by 4757 Members
Latest Member: chelltab
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 257 258 [259] 260 261 ... 275
3871  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Style trim group on: April 10, 2006, 04:11:24 PM
69's didn't have the bright belt reveal moldings - different body design that year.  Smiley
3872  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Passenger side rearview mirror location on: April 08, 2006, 01:24:20 PM
There was no factory option for a right side outside mirror in '67, but it was available as a dealer-installed accessory item.
3873  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: What options came with the Z21 style trim group? on: April 08, 2006, 01:23:01 PM
And a Z/28 ordered with Z-21 (an X-33 car) didn't get the pinstripes.
3874  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Z21 pin stripe on: April 07, 2006, 11:31:48 AM
What year car?
3875  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Camaro Z/28 front sway bar and power steering bracket on: April 06, 2006, 09:39:00 AM
Sounds like the car you're looking at has an older aftermarket (probably ADDCO) sway bar, and the guy on eBay doesn't know what he's talking about (as usual).
3876  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Ride Height Measurements on: April 05, 2006, 11:15:22 AM
'69 ride heights are specified in terms of design front and rear suspension heights (spring deflection) and rocker-to-ground heights; there's a chart in the UPC 0 section (sheet A10) of the '69 Assembly Manual that shows how to measure them and gives the numbers for each tire size/option condition.
3877  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Instrument panel question(s) on: April 04, 2006, 12:53:47 PM
I have two real quick questions involving the restoration of my instrument panel.

1. I canít seem to be able to get the front light knob off. Does it unscrew??
2. I canít get the entire left ďastro ventĒ mechanism to release. I canít find the screws?

Any tip on actually taking the entire instrument panel display off so I can clean and restore it and putting it back on would be a huge help.

Thanks,

Nick p.


The back side of the left astro vent housing is a slip-fit with a foam seal into the Fisher Body duct attached to the plenum; it will pull straight out.
3878  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 69 Z28 engine dates on: April 04, 2006, 12:47:28 PM
Engine assembly date (stamp pad date) typically precedes car final assembly date by 2-6 weeks, although there are many exceptions; the block casting date must (obviously) precede the pad stamp date.
3879  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Camaro Z/28 front sway bar and power steering bracket on: April 04, 2006, 12:42:38 PM
That's not a factory sway bar - all '69 Camaros used an 11/16" bar (except for the 13/16" bar on COPO 9737's); the end of the factory bar was nowhere near the upper ball joint (see photo below). The rear power steering pump bracket goes on top of the motormount, not between the mount and the block, as shown in the Assembly Manual.
3880  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396 fan clutch, ...correct PN(s)?? photos? on: April 03, 2006, 02:01:07 PM
The fan clutch code is only shown on the Chassis Broadcast Copy.
3881  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396 fan clutch, ...correct PN(s)?? photos? on: April 02, 2006, 12:23:52 PM
Ed, I don't have the part number or broadcast code info for 68's; I just know that both the Eaton and Schweitzer clutches were released as optional usages across all car lines in the 60's, as neither supplier could supply the total volume requirements.
3882  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Proper plating for hardware - J52 balance valve bracket & bolt @ '69 SS on: April 02, 2006, 12:16:26 PM
Hey John,

I wouldn't have believed it if you didn't post it.  BTW. did Jerry tell you the bolt was the wrong color?   Roll Eyes

Steve

Nope Smiley
3883  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Camaro RS on: April 02, 2006, 12:04:47 PM
Sounds like a standard car with some RS badging and Z28 stripes; tell us more when you get it home.
3884  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Proper plating for hardware - J52 balance valve bracket & bolt @ '69 SS on: April 01, 2006, 01:19:28 PM
Here's a photo of the bracket and bolt - I've had the booster and valve bracket restored by Jerry MacNeish, but the attaching bolt is the untouched original.
3885  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 396 fan clutch, ...correct PN(s)?? photos? on: April 01, 2006, 01:11:11 PM
The coil-type unit in the top group of photos is the Eaton clutch, and the one in the lower group of photos is the plate-type Schweitzer clutch; although their part numbers were different, both were used interchangeably in all Chevrolet applications, depending on which one happened to be stocked on the line at the time. I don't have a '68 A.I.M., but you'll see the interchangeable usage in the '69 A.I.M.; both part numbers are shown, with the second part number "opt." (optional usage); both of them were calibrated the same way, met Engineering specifications for that application, and either one is "correct".
Pages: 1 ... 257 258 [259] 260 261 ... 275
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.104 seconds with 18 queries.