CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 04:25:52 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106518 Posts in 12421 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 243 244 [245] 246 247 ... 276
3661  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: COPO? on: August 19, 2006, 07:32:28 PM
Oops - missed the "RS" item in the first post.  Undecided
3662  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: History of this site on: August 19, 2006, 07:25:08 PM
Bill, check out this link for CRG history and current members:

          http://www.camaros.org/aboutcrg.shtml

John Hinckley
3663  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: COPO? on: August 18, 2006, 11:37:12 AM
Only an SS would have had a black standard grille center section - see:

      http://www.camaros.org/exterior.shtml#1969Grille
3664  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Black Firewall Paint on: August 14, 2006, 10:03:47 AM
That's why it's important to have real original unrestored/unmolested cars to examine and use as educational properties when developing a judging standard, which is why NCRS has the "Star/Bowtie" judging category just for that kind of car. Star/Bowtie judging is done solely based on absolute originality, with no concern whatever for condition; Bloomington Gold has a similar category called "Survivor" judging. The judging standard for restored cars (NCRS Flight Judging) has been developed over the last 30 years based on observations of known-original cars as well as with Chevrolet Engineering documentation and an incredible amount of research at the part number level, and the 100 page-plus judging guides for each year car are revised every couple of years based on continuing observation and research by 15,000 members - we continue to learn as we go along.
3665  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: your thoughts on date code 302 on: August 14, 2006, 09:52:44 AM
I have 10B build date Z; Engine assy date is Sept; Block casting date is I 23 8 - Aug; Only about 6 weeks from block casting to assembled Camaro.

Jimmy V

I 23 8 is September 23rd, not August. Smiley
3666  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Did GM ever put M-20 in 69 Z-28?? on: August 12, 2006, 04:04:08 PM
Lots of Z's were built with M20. You had to order a 4-speed, but you could order M20, M21, or M22.
3667  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Is there date/year codes on hood hinges?? on: August 11, 2006, 09:53:35 AM
If they're dated, I've never noticed it - I don't see anything on my original '69 hinges.
3668  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Recommendation on Transmission Pilot Bearing on: August 08, 2006, 02:59:01 PM
I've used the GM needle roller bearing in several project cars (after dialing-in the bellhousings) with no problems at all. Gotta love the comment above about the needles at 7,000 rpm - there's no relative motion between the needles and the input shaft unless the clutch pedal is depressed; how often does anyone free-rev the engine to 7000 rpm with the clutch pedal on the floor?

The correct oilite bronze bushings work fine too, but take a magnet with you when you buy one, and don't take it if it's attracted to the magnet; there are lots of Chinese counterfeit bushings out there that are mostly iron, and they'll score the input shaft.
3669  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Dash Instrument Panel on: August 08, 2006, 02:50:45 PM
Make sure the stamped sheet metal grounding strap is still in one piece and is in place - it attaches to the wiper switch and the light switch, has a "leg" that attaches to the lower I.P. reinforcement, and has a wire pigtail on it that also attaches with a separate screw to the lower I.P. reinforcement along with the I.P. harness ground wire. If that strap isn't in place, the wipers won't work, nor will the instrument lights.
3670  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Smog tube question. on: August 08, 2006, 02:43:49 PM
They had a greenish-brownish-colored coating - don't remember the technical name for it, but it was never used on any other parts as far as I know.

3671  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 Camaro date codes-How close?? on: August 08, 2006, 02:21:46 PM
In that case you are in great shape!   Engine built on Nov 19, distributor built on Oct 25 works for me....now if I could just remember when to include or not to include the letterr I in the date coding process I'd have it made.

Here's your answer to that one:

    http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#GM-InternalDateCodes

Smiley
3672  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 SS350 Replacement Clutch Recommendation on: August 08, 2006, 02:12:34 PM
I've had good luck with LuK replacements - they're the largest OEM clutch manufacturer in the world, and have a good reputation for reliability; if your AutoZone doesn't stock them, they can get them for you, or you can get them at www.dialaclutch.com .
3673  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 camaro 327 exhaust manifold #'s needed on: August 07, 2006, 09:40:28 AM
The "527" and "826" manifolds are shown as correct for all manual transmission, with or without A.I.R., small block Camaro applications for 1969 including the 302 Z28 engine.  These manifolds have A.I.R. drilled and tapped connections.  If A.I.R was not used, the ports were plugged.   

From personal experience, I removed a set of the "527" and "826" manifolds from a 69 327 base coupe that had a 3 speed manual and no A.I.R.  The manifolds were required because of the 3 speed manual trannsmission.  Since there was no A.I.R., the ports were plugged from the factory.  The "527" manifold is currently on my car.

Plugs weren't used in the exhaust manifolds on non-A.I.R. engines - they used the same 527 and 826 castings, but they weren't drilled or tapped for the air manifolds. The only engines that used factory-installed plugs in the exhaust manifold openings were those that specified RPO KD1 (Less Air Injection) for overseas export.
3674  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Coil spring spacers for 67-69 Air Conditioned Camaro's? on: August 04, 2006, 10:50:04 AM
Absolutely not - Chevrolet NEVER released "spring spacers" for any application on any car line. Springs were computer-selected based on option weights in order to keep the bumpers within the Federally-mandated bumper height "window"; that's why there were so many different part numbers of springs with unique loaded heights and load rates, to suit the application.
3675  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: front brake conversion to disc on: August 02, 2006, 11:20:36 AM
Dropped spindles may "look cool", but it severely limits choice of front tire size and results in tire rubbing issues.
Pages: 1 ... 243 244 [245] 246 247 ... 276
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.095 seconds with 18 queries.