CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2014, 08:45:25 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105862 Posts in 12354 Topics by 4762 Members
Latest Member: HarryQ
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: July 08, 2014, 09:41:53 PM
Pic for above post!  449 US Highway 130 East Windsor NJ 08520 before it was torn down a few years ago.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: July 08, 2014, 09:40:25 PM
A week ago I posted that NCRS sent me my car dealer #166 in zone#35. they had no info on that dealer #. During an extensive on-line search I found on
www.drnew.com and one other site that a "Judge Chevrolet" and sometime after added olds and geo to there name. It was a 60s thru 80s dealer changing to "Beacon Chevy" after that, going out of business around 2000 in Hightstown NJ. This dealership name would fit perfectly before "June Chevrolet" that was dealer #167. I even have a pic. of it before it was recently torn down and rebuilt as part of a strip mall area. Any thoughts on this. Any one from that area? Thanks, Gary.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: June 30, 2014, 10:46:12 PM
Thank you very much Warren.  Is your list from the 1969 era?  Maybe I can still find a list with 166 on it. 
 Gary
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: June 27, 2014, 03:42:01 PM
Got mine back today. Zone 35. (N.J.).  Dealer code is 166 which is not available in current documents. any help would be greatly appreciated. I know it came from an individual just north of there near Nyack NY prior to me buying it. 1969 z28. Thanks Gary.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: May 27, 2014, 11:00:52 AM
How long are the reports taking these days?  Sorry, just exited.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: original paint 69 Z on ebay... "survivor" on: September 04, 2013, 10:05:14 PM
What do you mean "to low of a stock ride height?"  It is perfect!
And the cowl tag is clear as a bell!
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Sticky Throw out bearing? on: June 30, 2013, 07:03:24 AM
 I had the same problem. In my case the clutch fork bearing retainer was not riveted on the fork correctly. It was not letting the bearing center itself over the tranny output shaft, adding a lot of side pressure. As I worked the clutch during driving the bearing would really heat up. When I tore it down to find the problem the bearing was ready to fall apart from wear.
Not sure of the brand of fork but it was after market so there are more out there!
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 302 DZ Valve adjustment on: June 03, 2013, 09:05:12 PM
Thanks Jimmy, I am currently lashed at .030.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 302 DZ Valve adjustment on: April 10, 2013, 02:33:29 PM
Hey Jimmy V. if you happen to do a compression test or vacuum ck. I would love to know what #s you get. I have those rockers and I only have 7.5 inches of vacuum. I would like to eliminate them being the culprit. Everything else has been done! Thanks, Gary (myty)
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z/28 Question on: March 04, 2013, 09:13:58 AM
 Steve is correct on the very close mating with a car.
I was very surprised with your build date! Mine is the same day!
My block date, VO13ODZ. (Thursday) Block Casting date A289.(Two days prior)   Tag is 02A Following week (Feb. 3-7th)
Engine casting date, build date (Production date), and installed in car just days away.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: BLOCK CAST DATE VS PAD STAMP DATE on: January 03, 2013, 10:05:57 AM
Opps, can I fix that? I dont see an edit
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: BLOCK CAST DATE VS PAD STAMP DATE on: January 02, 2013, 07:48:09 PM
 My 02A 1969 Z28  (1st week Feb.)   Block cast A289                         (Jan. 28,1969)
                                                     Eng. Code V0130DZ                   (Jan. 30, 1969) V is Flint.  DZ is 69 302

                                                   Also, Differential BV0128G2          (Jan.28,1969)  BV is 4.10 Gears.
                                                              Cast A169                       (Jan.28,1969)  G is gear and axle plant.  2 is 2nd shift.   Gary.
          
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Compression test results... on: February 05, 2012, 03:34:04 PM
thanks john
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Compression test results... on: February 03, 2012, 11:14:09 PM
 Any body?  Thanks, Gary.
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 z28 dz 302 compression results low? on: November 20, 2011, 03:14:55 PM
 Todd, that is good info on that felpro gasket #. The last 2 gaskets seemed to sit to low on the intake openings which worsened my chances for a good seal with that imperfect intake angle.  Thanks again, Gary. I will let u know!
Pages: [1] 2
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.