CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 18, 2014, 02:25:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107455 Posts in 12500 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Hurst Shifter or Not on: October 20, 2013, 09:20:28 AM
I'm still NOT convinced they are date coded??  Maybe the experts can add to this???   I'm pretty sure I read the shifters where not date coded as well, Hmmm interesting.
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Hurst Shifter or Not on: October 19, 2013, 07:50:41 AM
Steve,

Is it the code there at the bottom of this extracted image that decodes to Dec '68?   Can you explain that, as I didn't know there was a date code for these shifters..

X2
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 dash grab handle and trim on: October 15, 2013, 09:08:58 PM
Thanks guys.  So the Cpp is a reproduction then.  That guy is claiming its an OEM (GM) part.
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Do we have a real SS in the garage? on: October 14, 2013, 12:31:51 PM
reinforcement plate for dual exhaust on rear driver side frame rail (in wheel well)  Huh?? 
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 69 dash grab handle and trim on: October 14, 2013, 11:39:22 AM
Anyone know if the plastic trim piece for the dash grab handle has GM part#'s on it?? (1969 Camaro) I found one with the letters CPP on it.  Is this a reproduction piece???  Thanks
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 4 speed shifter console pate# on: September 29, 2013, 06:31:21 AM
OK, thank you guys.  I actually thought # 3921800 was for a 68 ?  Hmmmm.
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 4 speed shifter console pate# on: September 28, 2013, 07:07:36 PM
Thanks Copo.
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1969 4 speed shifter console pate# on: September 28, 2013, 03:09:39 PM
Anyone know what the correct GM part# is for a 69 (Rosewood) 4 speed shifter console plate??  There appears to be 2 different part #'s ? Huh 3921801 and 3949537
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: "837" alternator deep grove pulley on: September 22, 2013, 04:05:38 PM
Thank you guys.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: "837" alternator deep grove pulley on: September 21, 2013, 11:29:09 AM
Thanks John, The notch is under the nut, like a keyway kind of thing.  See the "notch" in the fan??  Does the pulley have this??
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / "837" alternator deep grove pulley on: September 21, 2013, 08:53:36 AM
Did the deep grove alternator (#1100837) pulley have a notch in it???   I have seen some deep groove alternator pulleys without a notch in it??
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: restoring 69 hood hinges on: August 31, 2013, 03:57:34 PM
I have to find a cheap Large SS pot to put hinges in, LOL
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: restoring 69 hood hinges on: August 29, 2013, 04:04:45 PM
Thanks guys
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: restoring 69 hood hinges on: August 28, 2013, 06:56:44 PM
Thx Charley
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: restoring 69 hood hinges on: August 28, 2013, 04:39:37 PM
Which Palmettos is the "correct" finish Huh   Manganese or the Zinc??  Manganese solution appears to be charcoal black and the Zinc solution is a medium grey. 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 18 queries.