CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 20, 2014, 03:03:19 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107549 Posts in 12507 Topics by 4812 Members
Latest Member: oldbop88
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12
136  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Upper A-Arm Dust Sheilds on: May 01, 2012, 04:29:54 PM
I just installed new shields from Heartbeat City. Look pretty damn good to me. I was pleased with the quality. Didn't use the staples though.
137  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Stupid Question - What does Sway Bar Rubber Sleeve/Clamp do? on: March 22, 2012, 09:25:12 AM
I painted my sway bar phosphate because I was on HeartBeat City's web site and they list the color as phosphate in the sway bar description.  So black is it then.  Thanks
http://www.heartbeatcitycamaro.com/store/product/18353/Camaro-Front-sway-bar-HD-COPO-13-16-69/
138  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Stupid Question - What does Sway Bar Rubber Sleeve/Clamp do? on: March 21, 2012, 05:57:58 PM
Very nice!  Which black did you use on the sway bar ??
139  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Stupid Question - What does Sway Bar Rubber Sleeve/Clamp do? on: March 20, 2012, 03:16:40 PM
I thought the sway bar color was Dark Phosphate ?
140  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Moog 6312 front coils on: March 18, 2012, 08:59:54 PM
Nice car Indy!  I also installed Ricks 5 leafs (correct)  in back.  I sent the coil springs to get powdercoated in bare steel as they where originally.  Haven't installed them just yet.  Thanks for the pics.
141  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Moog 6312 front coils on: March 18, 2012, 08:17:48 AM
Hey thanks for the reply Indy !! I went with the 6312 because it was very close to what I removed which was the GM original "HQ" springs. I called Moog and got the specs to match the GM springs. I have read nothing but unhappy campers with the 6308.  I'm glad they worked for you.  Car doesn't sit too low???
142  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Moog 6312 front coils on: March 14, 2012, 08:45:44 AM
Anyone use Moog 6312 front coils ?  Thoughts, doubts, comments.
143  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: "HO" coil springs on: March 06, 2012, 09:01:38 AM
Its also strange that the "HQ" springs are NOT listed on the Camaro spring charts???  Can anyone elaborate on this Huh
144  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: "HO" coil springs on: March 04, 2012, 09:28:44 AM
I believe the "HQ" was also used on SS396 with 325hp or 350hp.  I wish someone knew of a very close replacement.  Moog 638 and 6312 are not really close as far as the spring rates go.  I read the "HQ" springs are 1830 lbs (LOAD) and 345 lbs/inch (RATE).
145  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: "HO" coil springs on: March 04, 2012, 12:06:36 AM
I looked hard again and think they are actually "HQ". GM# 3955724.  Having a tough time finding info on this # 3955724 with "HQ" tags.  Would love to match the spring rate and ride height.
http://www.heartbeatcitycamaro.com/store/product/17129/Camaro-Coil-spring-decals-HQ-3955724-69/
146  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / "HO" coil springs on: March 03, 2012, 11:31:51 PM
Anyone know what application "HO" front coil springs are for???  I just removed my front springs on my 69 BB and the tag appears to be "HO".  Any idea???
147  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: gm 3953218 pitman arm on: March 01, 2012, 05:03:29 PM
Thank you Mark as well.
148  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: gm 3953218 pitman arm on: March 01, 2012, 05:01:35 PM
DT,

I checked my '69 P&A.  None of the service replacement part numbers match your numbers.  Part numbers 3953217, 3953225 and 3953237 are as close as it gets.  It also says 3953219 is the forged number for part number 3953217.

Paul
Wow, thanks Paul, I got the 227 # from David Pozzi's web site, I think it is a misprint. If I'm not mistaken, the same 227 is in Jerry M's book, Should be 237.  So at this point the 3953218 has to be the forged number as you already mentioned. Thank you very much.
Don
149  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: gm 3953218 pitman arm on: March 01, 2012, 01:26:35 PM
Can't find that GM # anywhere though???  Huh

That's because it is a casting number, not a part number.   Smiley

Paul
You know I thought so, but wasn't sure because I believe the part #'s begin with 3953...  ?   227 is the last 3 digits.  Strange 227 is part# and 218 is casting #.
150  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: gm 3953218 pitman arm on: March 01, 2012, 12:49:50 PM
Can't find that GM # anywhere though???  Huh
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 18 queries.