CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2014, 11:46:13 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97511 Posts in 11718 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18
226  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cowl induction air cleaner 67 on: March 07, 2011, 12:09:17 PM
You may already be aware of this, but the ballasts are different each year and differ from Firebird as well.  See the stickys here, good info:

http://www.camaros.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=31

227  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Searching For Previous Owner on: February 24, 2011, 02:41:05 PM
Very good Paul.

Now how about that squigly doodle up on top?!

Ed


Someone call Nicholas Cage or Tom Hanks!
228  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: NOS on: February 16, 2011, 04:03:04 PM
You may also hear new original stock or new obsolete stock used.  New old stock is the more common term though.
229  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Wiring diagram for 67 8-track player, early design. on: February 09, 2011, 02:28:01 PM
I'm not very familiar with the 8 track setups but there was a recent discussion on the TC site:

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=190472

You should also search both sites.  I seem to recall other discussions about the 67 factory versus dealer installed systems.   

Also I saw this $$$ underdash switch recently on ebay, not sure if it's the correct part #:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1967-Chevrolet-Camaro-NOS-Stereo-Switch-Unit-_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQfitsZYearQ3a1967Q7cMakeQ3aChevroletQ7cModelQ3aCamaroQQhashZitem1e616e71e5QQitemZ130483646949QQptZVintageQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories

I believe the 67 assembly instruction manual (AIM) would also help you out on this.
230  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 door hinge repair on: February 04, 2011, 02:13:40 PM
Years ago I tried a drill and tap type detent repair kit, thing snapped off after a short period.  But maybe they're making them better now?

If you decide to replace you can carefully do one at a time and leave the door in place plus be close to correct door alignment from the start.  For a rebuild I wouldn't leave the door dangling that long a period.  Which ever way you go, have a buddy help you, even if they can just balance the door.  The last thing you need is the door flapping around on one hinge as the jack or dolly slides away and your fingers get crushed.
231  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Headlights dim on: February 02, 2011, 12:12:16 PM
FWIW, this was linked in on a dim headlight discussion, I believe over on the TC site.  Found it interesting but I'm no electrician and have no idea on content accuracy.  Also not an option if you're running a purely stock setup: 
 
http://www.madelectrical.com/electricaltech/brighter-headlights.shtml

 
232  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: looking for motor for car #124677N140669 on: January 06, 2011, 04:07:20 PM
If you're just looking to get close, there's an MS block 7N151033 in the 67 Orphans section.  I feel your pain, finally settled for one about 700 cars / two days before mine.  Never will stop looking though.  Seems those MS and MU blocks are pretty scare.
233  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: '69 Alternator ? on: December 08, 2010, 03:41:24 PM
July 24, 1970.  Looks like that part number was used beginning in 69 and at least up through 1971:

http://www.chevellestuff.com/qd/alt_numbers.htm
234  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 68 Power disk brakes problem on: December 01, 2010, 11:52:28 AM
If you send the calipers out for rebuild, make sure they don't grind down the casting # area to restamp with their own internal number.  Hopefully rebuilders today know not to do this, but I have seen some older rebuilds where this was done. 
235  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 68 Power disk brakes problem on: December 01, 2010, 11:46:38 AM
I can't explain it as good as he can, but basically you have to make sure your rotors are true to .003" or you could have problems. And you have to have them turned as an "assembly" (hub and rotor), or you won't get accurate results. Not so much an issue on the Camaro one piece rotors, but difficult on the original Camaro/Corvette two piece "hub and rotor" assemblies.

Ed


Ed - do you know of any source for new rotors for a 67-68 two piece setup?  I recently rediscovered my original two piece rotor hubs and would like to go back to stock, without having to buy the entire repopped hub/rotor assembly just to get a rotor.
236  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Prestone Brake Clean Parts Cleaner on: December 01, 2010, 11:28:21 AM
There's a few AutoZone's in Maryland - Frederick, Silver Spring, Laurel etc.  If you go to their website you can run a store locator that gives each store's phone #.  I was surprised Advance Auto doesn't carry it, as they have most other Prestone products.

 
237  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: D80 Rear Spoiler Dealer Install? on: November 11, 2010, 10:23:06 AM
I read somewhere in another thread that the deck lid was stamped at the factory. If this is correct can you tell me where the stamp is located and if this stamp dates the lid? Again...its a 12A Van Nuys build.

Thanks John

http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#sheet

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=4938.0


238  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: SB Balancers are they ?? on: October 29, 2010, 03:20:53 PM
I believe, for 67 at least, the 350 and 302 were the only Camaro SBC applications that used the bigger 8 inch balancer.  Can't recall if the same part number.

Update - I did find an older thread that talked about 302 balancers where Jerry M said that the 350ci 8 inch was narrower than the 302.  Forgot to copy the URL.    
239  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 rs-ss on: October 28, 2010, 02:54:49 PM
That TT counterfeiter must have been a slacker - he could have included a couple more possible options  Wink
240  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 center dash panel on: October 07, 2010, 08:52:20 AM
Woodgrain was not used on any 67 Camaros
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.079 seconds with 18 queries.