Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - nuts4coke

Pages: 1 [2]
16
Originality / Re: Manual to Disc Upgrade... do I affect originality?
« on: July 23, 2010, 01:01:31 PM »
Well, I'm wanting to keep the car as it would have been in the showroom. Not necessarily as it rolled out of the factory. Meaning, if I do a restoration, and I change from manual drum, to power disc, and I use components that would come from a 67 camaro, as near as I can tell, it would be considered stock. I would be honest if I sell it, but honestly, I don't plan on getting rid of this baby. It was born 10C of 66, about 7 to 10 days before I was born. My fourth Camaro. I don't plan on getting rid of it...

But what I'm getting at is keeping it stock. I would like to add as much stuff to this car that I could have got as an option, but that WOULD NOT have been included on the Trim Tag. Since my car is such a low option car, I figured I'd be able to upgrade it with things that would not appear on anything other than a build sheet, etc.. but not on the cowl tag. I understand certain things required certain other things, like if I go with RPO J50, and J52, neither of which were put on the trim tag, I have to put ZJ7 Rally's on the car. Well, those would then be 14 x 5. That's the size on a 67 with disc. So, I would be in the hunt for date correct wheels with a DA code on them.

Is  all this making sense? I want a stock/Original car, but I want it with as much stuff that wouldn't be identified on the Trim Tag... I won't make it an RS, because that's on the Trim Tag... but disc brakes aren't. (and i can't figure out why). What's funny is Power brakes were a dealer installed option,b ut discs weren't. I think that's funny.)

My car, as it sits now, is a base model, with a correct cast date engine (J086), block cast of 3892657, correct engine pad stamp (V1012ME), correct cast on the heads (don't have the numbers with me, but I've looked them up), correct date on 2 speed powerglide tranny (T7R09D), and a VIN of 7N118980 (which puts it in the Norwood plant in October of 1966).

Anyway, if I build the brakes to power, disc front, drum rear, would I no longer be able to call the car original or should the word be 'stock'. Would I be reducing the cars value?

I guess my philosophy is this, and I could be wrong, so please let me know how you feel, but if there's no way to tell what EVERY option was on the car from day one, and the car has options added to it (correct to factory specs), does it change the car? I mean, who's to say this car didn't have these options from the factory?

And i'm not trying to build a car that I can turn around as a high optioned car and make money, on the contrary... I bought this car because of it's build date, and it being numbers matching... but if I'm going to do brake work (which I have to, because it needs it), why not go with a factory installed system from 67 that is disc, not drum, that is power, not manual, allowing me to 'option correct' put rally wheels on it. etc, etc...

@MyRed67 - my car is Marina Blue with Blue Interior. The previous owners bought it from the guy who restored it, but I'm having a heck of a time trying to get info about that guy from them. They lived in Tenn, they bought it in Ohio, so I'm going to try and get with the DMV in Ohio, and see if I can back-track from there with the VIN number. I would like to find out as much about the car as possible, and get any pictures I can of it, especially if they are from 66 or 67. Anyway, the guy who did the restore put Z28 stripes on her, and cragar wheels, both of which will go when I restore it. It's got a Edelbrock performer intake, carb, air cleaner, and an Accel distributor, all of which I want to get rid of, and get my hands on the stock 2 bbl intake and Rochester carb. i want original valve covers (those are edelbrock right now also)... and I think the radiator is wrong. Looks to big... the shroud doesn't go all the way to the edge on the drivers side, and the fan sits about 6 inches behind the radiator, and the four blade fan comes about an inch away from the opening of the shroud. I was under the impression that the fan should sit closer to the radiator, and the blades come VERY close to the edge of the shroud. She over heats on a hot day if you are standing still... like at a drive thru or something...

17
Originality / Manual to Disc Upgrade... do I affect originality?
« on: July 22, 2010, 06:50:03 PM »
I have a 67, base, with barely ANYTHING on the Trim Tag. Low option car. 327/2spd PG... yada yada and it has 4 wheel manual drum. If I go to a power disc system up front, in lieu of the manual drum system I have now, do I affect the originality if I use stock components? I can't seem to find anywhere this information would be tracked (say the Trim Tag), so once it was done, and done correctly, it wouldn't stand out as modified... would it? This is assuming use of ALL compnents that would be on a stock 67 with a power disc/drum setup.

18
I have a 10C, almost all original, I will take a look, and maybe some pics, and see if that helps you out.

19
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Need Big HELP with 67 RS/SS numbers
« on: March 30, 2010, 03:15:08 PM »
I would ask to check the hidden vin numbers first. Even then be careful how you state your suspicion. If you are wrong the dealer might take you to court. It's also possible somebody made one camaro from two. They could have taken a good drivetrain from a rust bucket, flood or similar donor  and put it in a solid body to solve drivetrain problems. I've also seen front half - rear half projects made from two wrecks.
Why would I have to be careful how I state my suspicion? He's advertising the car as a factory matching, original car... and it's clearly not. Nothing about it is. It is possible that since this dealer bought the car out of state, froma private collection that was letting some of it's cars go, that he didn't do the proper research, or took someones word for it, and doesn't know he has a bastard, possibly stolen, car....

I've asked them at the dealer if they have verified that the partial VINs are the same, and I haven't heard back from them.... like I am being avoided... dealer's hate (even on a new car) an educated customer.... makes them harder to deal with.

20
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Need Big HELP with 67 RS/SS numbers
« on: March 30, 2010, 01:16:36 PM »
Needlesss to say we left. That car, in my opinion, was stolen somewhere in it's lifetime. These cars were high theft vehicles back when they were new and I think there are probably lots of them floating around out there with owners who have no knowledge of it.

Wow, I would have written the number down, and contacted the authorities to see if it was stolen. In fact, I have half a mind to call the authorities in the town where this dealer is at, and let them know they may have a stolen car in their midsts.... I mean, if I was the owner of this car that was stolen, and the cops called me and said "Mr. Smith, we found your 67 Camaro", I'd be ecstatic!

Any opinions?

21
Decoding/Numbers / Need Big HELP with 67 RS/SS numbers
« on: March 29, 2010, 07:45:59 PM »
So I've come across a 1967 RS/SS, and nothing seems to be coming together, and every time I think i get closer to this car being what it says it is, a numbers matching survivor, I get two steps away from it being that... and it keeps sounding like a clone or a bastard car.... here's what I've got.

VIN: 124377N21#### (last part left off until I've determined if I should purchase or not)
NO PROTECT-O-PLATE with this car
TRIM TAG:
11E (nov-5th week)
67-12637 NOR 43397 BODY
797-Z             C-2     PAINT
E  2EMG  3SL
4P   5Y

Axle Code: PC1128O
Transmission (oil Pan): C6E28D
Engine Cating 3892657 with a date of supposidly J257

Now, the VIN seems real high for a car that was built in November of 1966. I've been using information at Camaros.org to decode all of these numbers.... and what I come up with doesn't make sense... and leads me to believe this is a bastard or clone car (some trying to 'fake' a 67 350 RS/SS)

First of all, the car LOOKS like it's supposed to, with striping, brake lights, back up lights, and everything like paint, and options, seem to make the TRIM TAG... but I can't figure out a few things...

The VIN number being a N21####, when from what I can tell, November 1966 built NORWOOD VINs should be much much lower than this.... and according to comaros.org, this VIN was built in May of 1967.
There are no Partial VIN, or Engine stamps on the block pad of the engine because it's supposidly been 'decked' back int he 80's during a rebuild. The only numbers I've been able to get from the engine are the casting of 3892657, and the date of J257. Now, would the date of J257 be October 25th, 1967 (as the actual date), or does it indeed mean the 'model' year of the car, being a 67, and that the J257 means Oct 25th, 1966?

The transmission oil pan starts with C6E28, which tells me May 28th, 1966.... but a pan could be replaced... so I've asked the guy to fetch me the partial VIN number on the bell housing.... to see if it matches up with the VIN of the car. My suspicions are starting to tell me it probably won't match.

Now he told me the axle said PC1128O, but I think he meant 'G' not 'O' at the end... and the PC says it's a 12 bolt built Nov 28th. I've got him getting me the casting date off the pumpkin to see if I can narrow down the year....

Does anyone have any suggestions, or comments? I'd really appreciate the help. I jsut can't tell if this car was built in the fall of 1966, or around May of 67, and in either case, if it's not a 'numbers matching' because of all the other codes, etc... from these parts....

Is there anything else i should be considering? Looking for? Asking?

Thanks for your time everyone....

JW

Pages: 1 [2]