CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 30, 2015, 09:00:45 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109286 Posts in 12657 Topics by 4866 Members
Latest Member: jamejia1967
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12
151  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Temperature sensor on: September 08, 2010, 10:53:28 PM
The GM part number was 546702 and it fit just about anything with gauges from 1963 through 1975. Not sure if this is still a good number or not.
152  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Gas tank cleaning - need help on: July 16, 2010, 09:58:02 AM
Hey John, who makes the best reproduction fuel tanks for a 69? Thanks.

boston14
1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible
153  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: has anyone seen different versions of the light monitoring system ? on: July 16, 2010, 09:40:37 AM
If you check the 69 assembly manual, U46  A2  page 425, you will see only 2 fiber optics for the front.  You cannot have three since the high beam and low beam are the same bulb.
154  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Gen Light on: May 27, 2010, 09:58:01 AM
I would do a proper alternator check. By this I mean to disassemble it and electrically test each component. Sounds like a possible diode problem (always check diodes with a diode tester not an ohm meter).  Always remember, new means new, and does not necessarily mean good.


boston14
1969 RS/SS 350 Conv.
155  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: replacing heater core on: March 20, 2010, 07:03:10 PM
I was taught something about 40 years ago .............. New means new, but new does not necessarily mean good.  This even has more meaning in this day and age with most of the parts (including GM) being produced offshore.


boston14
1969 RS/SS 350 Convert.
156  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: What to do with Fisher Body tag? on: March 16, 2010, 07:04:40 PM
Kurt, are you sure Denise or Brenda won't hurt the tag? I heard they can be pretty rough..........  Smiley
Thanks again for all the help.


boston14

1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible
157  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: What to do with Fisher Body tag? on: March 15, 2010, 08:18:34 PM
One more question on this subject.  What is a good stripper that won't hurt the aluminum tag?  Thanks for all the input guys.
158  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / What to do with Fisher Body tag? on: March 09, 2010, 09:05:44 PM
I am in the process of doing a total restoration to my 1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible and I need some input as to what to do with the Fisher Body tag. Should I remove it to restore the firewall? and then refinish the tag, Or do I tape it off and work around it? Or do I leave it attached, strip it and paint it with the rest of the firewall? What is the proper way to do this? Thanks.


boston14
1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible
159  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 L48 Automatic Exhaust Manifolds on: February 22, 2010, 08:36:47 PM
Thanks for the numbers. If I squint, turn my head a little, and hold my mouth just right, I can see those numbers in my manifolds. Well, should I bead blast the manifolds, paint with exhaust manifold grey and move to the next parts (after all they are the original manifolds)? Or try to find a better pair. Any comments are welcome. Thanks.


boston14
1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible
160  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 1969 L48 Automatic Exhaust Manifolds on: February 20, 2010, 11:09:03 PM
I am finally in the process of restoring my 69 RS/SS 350 convertible after owning it 33 years.  I have a question about the exhaust manifolds.  I removed them from the car today and tried to read the numbers on them. I know they are original as I purchased the car from the first owner. The car spent it's first eight years in New England and the manifold numbers are very difficult (if not impossible) to read.  Can anyone tell me what the numbers are supposed to be and if they would keep these manifolds or try to find a less pitted set. Thanks.

boston14

1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible
161  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9L521002 - Z/28 engine on: February 20, 2010, 10:08:12 AM
Heads were cast after engine was built (Aug 1969 heads on a Feb 1969 build). Could be correct for 302 but not for the build date.

boston14
1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible
162  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Question about Fisher Body date on: February 17, 2010, 03:43:41 PM
Thanks to all for your help. I now have a pretty good understanding about the build of my car.  I also understand that records are no better than the one who keeps them. Chevrolet and Fisher Body didn't keep good records, but those were the times.  Guess we must do the best with what we have. Good research can fill in some of the blanks, but I think there will always be questions. Thanks again.

boston14
1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible
163  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Question about Fisher Body date on: February 16, 2010, 11:28:29 PM
My car's VIN is 124679N552528.  According to production figures at Norwood, it was the 666th car built in December. How many cars a day were being produced at that time? Would this number put the car out around December 4th? If that is close, then I would guess that the 11D on my Fisher Body tag was from the week of Nov 25 to Nov 30. Am I thinking correctly? I appreciate all the input!!

boston14
1969 RS/SS 350 Convertible
164  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Bowtie Sticker on Valve cover on: February 08, 2010, 07:40:18 PM
My 1969 RS/SS L48 has a silver with a red bowtie Tonawanda sticker on the right (passenger side) valve cover. The engine was made at the Tonawanda plant.
165  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Question about Fisher Body date on: February 05, 2010, 06:07:15 PM
ok.........., then let's go about this another way ................ Does anybody have or have they seen an 11E car?? I would appreciate it if you guys with access to the database could let me know. Thanks.
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 18 queries.