CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 28, 2015, 01:21:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109190 Posts in 12646 Topics by 4861 Members
Latest Member: TFuehrer
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 13
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1100837 alternator on: September 27, 2014, 10:30:45 PM
Got you mixed up with Steve, thanks for all the info.
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1100837 alternator on: September 27, 2014, 09:28:55 PM
Steve just curious, what is your block's casting date?
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1100837 alternator on: September 27, 2014, 09:27:01 PM
i dont know how you did that,   but thanks!
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1100837 alternator on: September 27, 2014, 07:43:15 PM
Steve, the alternator is on ebay right now so I'm not sure how to grab a picture from there.
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1100837 alternator on: September 27, 2014, 09:21:30 AM
I did have that date written wrong, it is 9 H 25. I don't know how to post a pic of it on here, I'd like to to get an opinion on it.
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1100837 alternator on: September 27, 2014, 07:37:34 AM
I'm looking at a 837 alt thats dated H 25 9. My car was built 9 A 9 and the motor is stamped H 25. Would this alternator be too late for my car?
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro backfiring on: September 13, 2014, 01:04:21 PM
Exhaust
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 Camaro backfiring on: September 13, 2014, 11:28:17 AM
What would cause my 69 Camaro to backfire? First time it happened when I was starting the car and today it happened when I was accelerating on the highway.
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 camaro seat belts on: September 08, 2014, 07:06:41 PM
Just checked , my rear lap belts tags both read Robbins 3910 40k7. I think they have been changed.
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 camaro seat belts on: September 06, 2014, 04:54:13 PM
I only have two rear lap belts in my car . My car was a late 1969 build  (September) Is it possible that GM switched to two rear lap belts for the 1970 model and thats why I only have two rear lap belts ?
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 camaro seat belts on: September 06, 2014, 11:14:03 AM
My seat belts in my camaro read 18-A-69, how do I decode them?
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Auction Last Weekend at Auburn on: September 02, 2014, 06:26:03 PM
I was at Auburn last weekend and I have to agree with you, prices remain steady, didn't really see too many deals. I did see a 1987 GNX with 90 miles on it go thru, the car didn't hit the reserve and after that I saw the same car with a price of 100,00.00 on the windshield.
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Shift knob on: July 30, 2014, 02:47:06 PM
I've seen that sellers prices before, he is always priced way too high.
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: July 18, 2014, 03:51:20 PM
Thanks so much Paul, I thought the car came from the Milwaukee Wisconsin area. Now I'll look for info in Grand Rapids, Mi.
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original dealer info for 1st gens is available on: July 17, 2014, 04:33:41 PM
Just received my NCRS shipping docs and does anyone know what dealer is code 22 in zone 45 translate too ?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 13
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.336 seconds with 18 queries.