CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2014, 07:49:50 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105660 Posts in 12338 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 12
121  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro A.I.R. pump on: September 30, 2011, 09:53:20 AM
I'm not sure what I should do Kurt, Did Chevorlet put use the same pump in all models in 1969? Should I even be concerned that the numbers not cast in back?
122  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro A.I.R. pump on: September 29, 2011, 09:15:56 PM
I'm still at a loss as to why the back isn't stamped 7801149. I thought all pumps were stamped with this number.
123  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro A.I.R. pump on: September 29, 2011, 06:01:52 PM
I want to add , he says there is a date cast into the pump under the white fan.
124  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 Camaro A.I.R. pump on: September 29, 2011, 04:53:04 PM
I'm looking to purchase an a.i.r. pump for my 69 Z28. From the research I've done I looked for a 7801149 pump. I located a pump, it,s a June of 1969 date has the white fan, but isn't stamped with the 7801149 on the back, it does have the number 780650 behind the white fan and isn't a restamp pump. The pump comes from a reputable seller and he says that not all pumps had that 1149 number stamped on the back. The reason he's thinks that is because he has other pumps without that number that are original and unrestored. Whats do you guys think?
125  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 69 Camaro battery on: September 18, 2011, 01:37:00 PM
My bolts on my battery  positive and negitive cables are both worn out (rounded). Where can I locate original bolts, I've seen reproduction and they are not quite the same.
126  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: M21 shifter linkage grommets on: September 18, 2011, 01:29:59 PM
Thanks so much guys, I've been looking for these grommets a long time.
127  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / M21 shifter linkage grommets on: September 16, 2011, 04:20:03 PM
I'm looking for the rubber grommets that the shifter rods go into on my muncie shifter linkage. I can't find them anywhere. Does anyone know of a good place to buy them?
128  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Another Dreamer on: September 07, 2011, 10:00:29 PM
Yeah same seller
129  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Another Dreamer on: September 07, 2011, 09:34:08 PM
Here we go again another guy trying to get rich on Ebay with Z parts   I don't know how to link with Ebay but here is the item number 130573431813
130  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1111480 on: August 22, 2011, 04:45:04 PM
I recently came across a 1111480 distributor on ebay, the seller has a buy it now price for $2800.00 bucks! It looks very original but come on is this reality?
131  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 Z28 theft recovery on: August 13, 2011, 08:39:40 AM
Thru past owers I was told my car came from Milwaukee Wisconsin. The car was purchased as a theft recovery vehicle sometime in the early 1970's or 1971. Being that it was stolen would there be any way to find old police records or any other kind of info to locate who owned the car when it was stolen?
132  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: B.U. rear end on: August 10, 2011, 03:10:06 PM
 Kurt the axle tube on the latter axle is stamped 7 22, the casting date is F 23, if that makes a difference, but actually I know this axle is a little early for my car
 
133  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: B.U. rear end on: August 09, 2011, 08:05:30 PM
Thanks Ed, I'll keep looking, after all both of these axles are very expensive so I would hate to buy the wrong one for my car.
134  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: B.U. rear end on: August 09, 2011, 04:13:37 PM
Thanks Ed, my cars build date was 1st week of September 69. I've had such a hard time locating a rear end that would work for my car I was thinking on settling for one of these rear ends. I'm not sure what to do, do you think I should keep on looking?
135  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / B.U. rear end on: August 08, 2011, 04:56:26 PM
I, m looking at two B.U. 3:73 rear ends for my 69 Z28. The first one is dated C 26 9, this rear end has orginal gears and yh axles, the other is dated F 23 9, this rear end will have new gears and yh axles. My motor is dated H 22 9. Which would be a better axle for my car, my main goal is trying to keep it original
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 12
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.073 seconds with 18 queries.