CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2014, 08:00:34 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97109 Posts in 11684 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
121  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Z28 Cowl Tag on: March 02, 2011, 09:52:01 PM
I  can't get a picture of the cowl tag to load on this site, any suggestions?
122  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 Z28 Cowl Tag on: February 26, 2011, 05:54:37 PM

i need to ask the CRG members a question about my Z28, on my Cowl Tag my build date reads 091, shouldn't it read a number followed by a letter "a-e". Its a late 69 build, was there a change in stamping on the cowl tags for the new production year? I know its a 69 but was this how 70 cowl tags were done . I was wondering if someone can shed some light on this.
123  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: N.E. Ohio 1st Gen Owners on: February 26, 2011, 05:45:57 PM
I live in Toledo, Ohio ( northwest), I own a 1969 hugger orange Z
124  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 837 Alt. on: January 24, 2011, 10:23:35 PM
Found a 1969 Alt dated 9H21 for sale, my engine pad is stamped 9H25, is this too close? Should I be looking for something a week before the 25th or two weeks before the 25th? Just not sure and wanted to ask the CRG members, thanks.
125  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 1969 Z28 distributor on: January 23, 2011, 07:17:17 PM
My Z28 is a early Sept. 69 car, I was recently told my car did not get a 1111480 distributor, it is supposed to have a 2003 distributor. It was explained to me that because it was a late car that is why I have trouble finding a 480 dist. with a july or august date. Is this correct? Any help is appreciated, thanks.
126  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 3942527 3946826 exhaust manifolds on: January 10, 2011, 10:23:36 PM
I'm looking for 3942527 and 3946826 exhaust manifolds with July or August 1969 dates for my 69 Z28. If anyone out there has a pair let me know, thanks, Jeff Wise.
127  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 1100837 Alternator on: December 05, 2010, 04:46:11 PM
I wanted to ask CRG members a question, I ran across a 1969 1100837 Alternator dated 9H6, My 1969 Z28 was built 1st week September 1969, the engine is dated August 25 th 1969. I was wondering if this would be a correct date for my car. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
128  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: restamped distributor on: April 24, 2010, 12:44:01 AM
I've just spent the last 6 months researching the history of my 69 Z28. Like most Z28,s of that era it was driven hard with not much concern about original parts, but what survived was the drivetrain.
I can't afford buying all original nos parts, dist., alt. starter, etc., but I can afford a restamped part. I would never pass any restamped part as original. I didn't mean to mislead any of the CRG members with my post.
129  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Wanting original owner info on: April 24, 2010, 12:06:20 AM
I'm searching for the original owner of my 1969 Z28. I have found most of the previous owners (mostly in Janesville, WI area) but found it originally came from Milwaukee, WI area. The car was originally Hugger Orange with white stripes,black interior, no center console, rare center fuel gauge . The car was purchased by the second owner at either a repossession lot or as a stolen recovery. I would like to complete the owner history of my baby. I also was wondering about whether the original owner had a cross ram on it at one time, as it doesn't now. Thanks for any help you can provide
130  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 Z28 - selling dealer? on: April 17, 2010, 07:23:20 PM
Working on locating the original owner of my 69 Z28, tracked it down to the person that had it in 1970, one more person to find ! It's not easy but through a little detective work on my own I was able to use the internet to do all of my search. Try a website called Zabasearch  I found everyone I was looking for because of that site, (one person at a time). Start with the last known person that owned it and search for the them on that site. Good Luck
131  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: restamped distributor on: April 15, 2010, 10:25:40 PM
I've just spent the last 6 months researching the history of my 69 Z28. Like most Z28,s of that era it was driven hard with not much concern about original parts, but what survived was the drivetrain.
I can't afford buying all original nos parts, dist., alt. starter, etc., but I can afford a restamped part. I would never pass any restamped part as original. I didn't mean to mislead any of the Team Camaro members with my post.
132  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / restamped distributor on: April 13, 2010, 10:47:18 PM
Does anyone know who sells a good restamped 480 distributor?
133  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / September 1969 z28 exhaust Manifolds on: February 18, 2010, 10:41:53 PM
Does anyone have a set of 1969 Z28 Exhaust Manifolds for sale ? Need a date code around late August or very early September 1969.  3942527 and 3946826.
134  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 Z28 - selling dealer? on: January 17, 2010, 05:23:13 PM
Wow just came across this forum, I've ran into a dead end trying to find where my 1969 Z28 Camaro came from. This site gives me hope , does anyone have information on this vin. number 9N681810. The car supposedly came from Wisconsin.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 18 queries.