CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 10:13:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103830 Posts in 12193 Topics by 4703 Members
Latest Member: wishbone
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z/28 X77 garage/barn find on: Today at 08:16:51 PM
Darrell,
Nice find and mostly all original to boot, congrats. Can you please post a couple detailed pics of the master cylinder lid / wording. Dave
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Amazing 69 Z/28 Survivor on: Today at 05:22:25 PM
Chick,
Would it be possible to get detailed pics of the Master Cylinder Lid / Wording and Vent holes. Thanxs Dave
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 346 67-68 master cylinder cover on: Today at 05:02:22 PM
I have two original 346 Master Cylinders with the "WT" stamping. None have a Julian Date Code.

- The first MC has the backwards casted 346 part number and it has the SAE J1703 Lid

- The second one has the normal casted part number and has the same lid pictured above.

I'm assuming the backward 346 MC with the J1703 lid is for a verly late 68 Z28
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: vaccum hose connection on: August 21, 2014, 07:36:53 AM

No 1st-Gen Camaro had EGR, but the L-78 had a clip for the PCV hose that mounted under the right front carb nut.
[/quote]

John,
Did the PVC Hose bracket come on a 69 Z28 also.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 04D 14x7 rally wheel trim ring & center caps on: August 21, 2014, 07:31:10 AM
Are they 14x7 YJ Coded Rims? If they are the four outer clips are incorrect.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: march built z28 wheel on: August 21, 2014, 07:26:20 AM
K 1 9  2 @ 26 YH is the ONLY wheel made that is correct for NO March wheels were made. Good luck finding them for the are very EXPENSIVE if found. Dave
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Oil Pressure Gauge Block Sender Fitting on: June 26, 2014, 01:49:25 PM
His post on TC was sorta confusing as to which one he believed to be correct; his first photo was the one with the 'internally threaded' compression fitting and the last two photos he posted showed an externally threaded compression fitting.  
Steve:  You're saying that you agree with Dave that his 'first photo' shows the correct 'internally threaded' compression fitting?

Gary W,
I'm sorry that my post / pictures on TC #1 confused you with my verbage or which one I believed to be correct. The correct fitting is the one I posted with both male ends and all those pictures are of the same fitting with and without the oil line cap screwed on.  What I was trying to say or write should have read:  There has been some discussion reference the original oil line brass fitting. The one that keeps being discussed with the female end that is believed to be correct, but isn't is usally seen on early 60's vehicle.  All the oil line fitting that I have seen on a 69 Z28 is the one that I have pictured. Even my L48 Z11 Car has this fitting also and it original to the car. Maybe both styles were used, but I never seen that fitting used and a 69 Camaro Gauge Package Car".    
8  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / 19N629232 M21 Muncie Transmission P9C26B on: June 24, 2014, 06:45:49 AM
A buddy just picked this trans up from a long time hoarder. The partial VIN is as follows: 19N629232 and is stamped P9C26B (March 26, 1969)  Muncie 21                                                          Possible matches are 124379N629232 Coupe / Conv 124679N629232
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Gear reduction unit on: June 06, 2014, 08:24:52 AM
My 67 Z28 with 4.88 gears has the reducer # 6476735 (1: .824).
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1967 Camaro radius rod research on: May 29, 2014, 09:02:58 AM
I have seen Birds with the square bar also.
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1967 Camaro radius rod research on: May 21, 2014, 08:10:28 PM
Yes, it would! Come on guys let us know..
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1967 Camaro radius rod research on: May 21, 2014, 02:05:55 PM
On the lower pictures; first picture you can see the circular press marks just below the side notches. And on the last picture you can see the factory hole just above the side notches. Thats what I'm asking about.
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1967 Camaro radius rod research on: May 21, 2014, 02:01:35 PM
Mike,
Thats not what I'm asking. I'm referencing cosmetic looks on the bracket welded on the axle tube for the square bar.  I've seen some with press marks and another with a hole on the backside of the bracket. It can be viewed on this link       http://www.camaros.org/radiusrod.shtml
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1967 Camaro radius rod research on: May 21, 2014, 09:46:40 AM
Does anyone know why or when the change of the axle bracket came to play on the Second Design - Rectangular Radius Rod. I've seen two versions, one have a press mark and the other having a hole drilled just above the side dimples? I'm surmising a June of 67 change.
15  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1968 - Orphans / Re: 1968 302 124378N475679 Z28 Engine on: April 28, 2014, 09:34:39 AM
Engine Pad V0619MO
Block Casting 3914678
Block Date F 11 8
291 Heads F 12 8 & F 13 8
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.768 seconds with 18 queries.