CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2015, 01:50:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112378 Posts in 12912 Topics by 4944 Members
Latest Member: 68RS/SS
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 81
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Holes in choke tower of Holleys? WHY? on: August 28, 2013, 12:16:31 AM
Why not just buy a double pumper carb to start with?
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: I found a Sequoia Green Z28 with air plenum 9 k miles ! on: August 13, 2013, 10:53:59 AM
I had the same tach on my L-48 mounted to the steering column with radiator hose clamps.
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Dang Mice! on: August 12, 2013, 09:36:03 PM
The little fellers get everywhere and ruin dang near everything they touch.
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Chrome shifter knob on: July 29, 2013, 10:46:41 AM
The threads strip out pretty easy and it pulls off the shifter into your hand too. I don't like the T-handle and me personally think they belong on a pulpwood truck but .........
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 Camaro Engine Identification on: July 29, 2013, 10:34:57 AM
Only one was required and installed on the drivers side at the dealership. Since the engine rotates clockwise (as seen from the front of the car (or counter-clockwise as seen from the drivers seat), the torque would make it "lift" on the driver side. The cable kept it from doing this by tightening up if the engine mount failed. One on the passenger side wouldn't do anything but slack the cable!


Ed isn't this backward? I'm not being a know-it-all nor a smarty pants, and I may be wrong but I think they rotate clockwise sitting in the drivers seat.
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Chrome shifter knob on: July 28, 2013, 11:11:03 AM
LOL I learned the hard way that a aftermarket Hurst white plastic ball is your friend with convertibles.
The metal ball when the top is down is hotter then the surface of the sun in your paw.
Think some heat is transferred from the drive train as well as the solar radiation the ball picks up just by sitting in direct sunlight.
So I often leave my plastic on all the time.

I have my White replacement ball on and it will stay. You are so correct that chrome ball is hotter than a 2 dollar pistol.
7  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1968 - Orphans / 18N31972x M22 on eBay on: July 26, 2013, 09:47:42 AM
M22 on eBay  build date P8P20  VIN 18N31972x   the link to auction is HERE

Location:Grand Rapids, Ohio

Seller: ostatediesel
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: True SS? on: July 25, 2013, 09:20:20 PM
 It will have documentation with the title I would think. I know state law vary from state to state but it should have a distinctive title with it saying the VIN has been replaced by CHP.
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 1969 Z/28 DZ 302 overbore to .040? Piston Source? on: July 24, 2013, 09:16:13 PM

Mine must have been one of the trials - less than .0002 (read as 2/10,000's, not .002) taper in the bore after 50K plus miles - machine shop remarked it was extremely straight, considering the wear on the pistons. BTW - a lot of 010 blocks are around with just that percentage cast on the block surface. Bores usually look pretty good compared to blocks like my 2 - 678's - heavy ring lands that took at least a .030 overbore.


And, as it turned out after further research with the Saginaw Foundry (now called Saginaw Metal Casting Operations, part of the GM Powertrain Division), the old story many of us were led to believe about the 010/020 describing the tin/nickel alloy turns out NOT to have been true at all, although the magazines thought it was true and continued to publish the tale, and still do today.

Actually, the "010/020" cast into the front bulkhead under the timing cover turned out to be simply the identifier for the foundry pattern for the front bulkhead, which was shared by the 3970010 (350) and 3970020 (307) blocks; it had nothing to do with the iron alloy, which was never altered for any particular production block (although the alloy was altered for some later low-volume GM Performance Parts over-the-counter "Bowtie" blocks).
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 RS on: July 24, 2013, 04:25:34 PM
My bad there on the build year.  Yes.  My '67 is a 10/11 - '66 build car.

Are you ever going to get us some pictures put up? OH how we love pictures !!! Cool
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 1969 Z/28 DZ 302 overbore to .040? Piston Source? on: July 24, 2013, 08:43:38 AM
My DZ 302 is out and apart for the first time since I got it. The block is already at .030 and needs to go a little further.

    Not trying to be nosey, or reinvent the wheel, but what does the block measure out as ? When I rebuilt my '69 in '75, the original pistons were worn, but the block was great after 50K miles - the high tin/nickel content in the block casting did what GM bumped the percentages up for; kept wear to a minimum in the block, pistons become the wear parts.

Not according to JohnZ. All the added tin and nickel was dropped because it didn't improve the blocks.

" the "010-020" raised numbers that indicate the 0.1% and 0.2% tin and nickel content in some blocks; that was an extended tryout where the added tin was to improve machinability and the added nickel was to improve bore wear. It was discontinued when the promised warranty improvements failed to appear, and the added cost was no longer justified."
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 parchment interior? on: July 20, 2013, 05:23:19 PM
I wouldn't bet my life on it but I think Black was default with Parchment.
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z 28 pictures looking for input on: July 17, 2013, 09:58:47 AM
Call me crazy but I would have to say somebody screwed up on the heater hose bracket. I've been pulling wrenches since buck was calf and I ain't never seen a silver one.
14  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Muncie M21 VIN 19N523216 on eBay on: July 17, 2013, 09:48:35 AM
Muncie 19N523216 M21 with shifter is HERE

Seller: oneultraman

Location:  Milford, Ohio
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust manifold bolts. on: July 11, 2013, 09:10:04 PM
Yeah I got a kit from AMK and included everything including the French locks.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 81
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 18 queries.