CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2014, 01:49:46 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97157 Posts in 11687 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
91  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: orange motor paint on: December 22, 2010, 06:22:29 PM
Thanks for the input... ordered case EN-48.
92  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / orange motor paint on: December 19, 2010, 01:57:53 PM
Was preparing a D & R order and noticed that they had orange engine enamel paint in SPRUCE Seymour 98-48. Does anybody know if this is the same as Seymour EN-48?
93  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Spark plug wire Heat shields on: December 19, 2010, 01:04:15 AM
Thanks Looked up online and their it is as you stated. My hard copy of theirs gives a little diff description.
94  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Spark plug wire Heat shields on: December 18, 2010, 03:28:04 PM
D&R has in their description that they have retooled and I am wondering if they are still (correct) as when Jerry made his comment in 08..?? The above threads are in 08.
95  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Spark plug wire Heat shields on: December 18, 2010, 01:07:46 AM
Anyone know if the shields that D&R selling now (newly retooled) Correct? Are there better choices?
96  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Fuel Return lines on: December 16, 2010, 09:57:43 PM
Mark,
This was what I was fishing for!  A great thread and one that will be helpful to many!

 Thanks. Brad
97  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / SB Motor Brackets on: December 15, 2010, 08:23:36 PM
Does anybody have any pics of 69 350/300 SS engine compartments that would show all the proper brackets and locations mounting ect. At the point of installing intake back on block and attempting to place all brackets back where they should go.
Brad
98  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Fuel Return lines on: December 14, 2010, 09:34:58 AM
What are you calling the return port? The one on the fuel filter or the tube standing up on top of the qjet.   The one that comes out of the carb is a Bowl vent over the float assy. This should not be sealed.
99  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Fuel Return lines on: December 13, 2010, 05:15:14 PM
Correct in the fact that returns were only on the qjets. But I am still curious in GM's reasoning for its' use, might it be the same.
100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Fuel Return lines on: December 13, 2010, 03:52:37 PM
Engine flooding...
Mark,
I still am interested by one of your earlier thoughts on the purpose for the return line on the Qjets to start with. I think somebody out there should have the answer.
Makes sense to me that it would be a relief, and allow a better fuel flow helping to keep the fuel temp in the line down. No...maybe...?
I have changed the carb since, don't seem to have the same problem, but it has not been a hot as it was. I think that the above question is addressing my problem. It seems as if the fuel line is getting hot enough to overpressure the line or vaporize the fuel. We all can remember the days when "vapor lock" was a common word.
Brad
101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: flooding engine on: November 27, 2010, 09:58:28 AM
Mark,
I still am interested by one of your earlier thoughts on the purpose for the return line on the Qjets to start with. I think somebody out there should have the answer.
Makes sense to me that it would be a relief, and allow a better fuel flow helping to keep the fuel temp in the line down. No...maybe...?
I have changed the carb since, dont seem to have the same problem, but it has not been a hot as it was. I think that the above question is addressing my problem. It seems as if the fuel line is getting hot enough to overpressure the line or vaporize the fuel. We all can remember the days when "vapor lock" was a common word.
Brad
102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: SB Camshaft specs on: November 14, 2010, 03:29:54 PM
Mark,
Say you use with auto/air with no problems? What kind of idle will the 962 give me?
Brad
103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / SB Camshaft specs on: November 12, 2010, 10:39:24 PM
Rebuilding a 69 350/300hp and attempting to keep original as possible. Trying to find out info on camshaft, Could not find GM  part number on it but did find the GM stamp. Will most likely have to bore, will replace with orig style flat tops. Will have 041 heads and leave the cast qjet intake and carb. This is a 350 automatic car with air. Would like a slightly overstock performance cam with a good sound but not to loose any vacuum or effect on auto/air situation.
Does anybody have the specs on the stock 300hp cams used in 69 SS's. Or open to suggestions on good cam replacement.

Brad
104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: SB water pump kits on: November 09, 2010, 08:45:07 AM
Thanks, only thing that was making sense. Now to decide on re-builder or to order kit.
105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: SB water pump kits on: November 07, 2010, 08:49:12 PM
While checking all my numbers on motor parts I realized that the water pump on this engine was a 3953892. All the notes that I have found so far list a pump with the number 3953692. I started looking for the 892 with not much luck. What is the different  applications of the two?
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.101 seconds with 18 queries.