CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 16, 2014, 06:42:16 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104457 Posts in 12230 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 14
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise control? on: June 17, 2014, 10:29:21 AM
Unit is surging. Been a few since had my hands on one and remember little. Checked chain. I know hoses need to be changed but not sure of proper routing. Check this first. Suggestions welcome
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise control? on: June 17, 2014, 07:16:28 AM
Yes I know Mine is 2 tube and I have the 67 aim and the pics suck. I have the 69 chassis service book and it
Has great photos of that system. Was hoping the 67 shows the earlier two tube system in the same manor.
I have most books but hadn't yet got this one.
Thanks
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise control? on: June 16, 2014, 10:37:30 PM
Can someone fed me a pic of cruise hose routing and description from the 67 chassis service manual?
I have 69 and it shows unit with single hose servo. Mine is 2 hose
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Water pump on: June 14, 2014, 11:59:53 PM
Oh and it's a 67 12c car
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / L48 alternator part number on: June 14, 2014, 11:14:16 AM
Oops sorry Paul
67 4p car
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Water pump on: June 14, 2014, 09:15:29 AM
 would anybody mind telling me the correct casting number for a 67 L48 water pump
And range of accepted date code?
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / L48 alternator part number on: June 14, 2014, 09:06:03 AM
Which alt was on a L48 with air? Is a 12C car.
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: June 10, 2014, 11:23:01 AM
So in making sure I have taken all this in and understood properly....the only thing common from start to finish on one car that each dept see is the broadcast sheet. Correct? Fisher works off this as well as GM? So to really know for sure
About deletes such as nose stripes it would be on the broadcast sheet.
Say a z stripe delete might show up on cowl because that would effect what fisher had to do, but nose delete may not because it doesn't concern them?
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: June 06, 2014, 06:00:19 PM
I have a BB stripe delete 67 that has no tag markings at all to reflect such. But I do have notes with dates, names and phone numbers where the factory had been contacted day after car was ordered at dealer.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Where to look for build sheet on very original 67 on: May 07, 2014, 08:51:31 PM
Have a friend that bought his 67 new. He showed me the broadcast sheet for it and said it was in the glove box.
It is a Norwood car.
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: May 07, 2014, 07:34:06 AM
Adding my 2 cents...... from info I have gathered most of which has been at this sight....the dash method didn't start until the 68's and was nothing or 0-0 paint code then. But any fleet order or special paint order would cause this to appear on cowl tag. Special paint meaning other than standard or stripe delete or color changes to same.
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: May 05, 2014, 05:36:18 PM
Man this stuff just keeps firing up your curiosity. Gm sure left a lot up to the imagination
with the first gens. Find one answer and it just creates another question. Love it. Or love to hate it.
Ok.......so now I guess my question to dwell on is........who if anyone, can say if they ever saw this on a window sticker.
The forum and data does mention the relationship of this subject to the 1001AA as a no cost code as I mentioned earlier. But as Mark said the probability of not being on the sticker makes sense. Well I take that back..
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: May 05, 2014, 01:23:25 PM
So Mark, your saying that in your opinion that a FSO for delete of stripe, that it would show on broadcast, build and window stickers only?
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: May 05, 2014, 09:37:21 AM
The reason in my having such interest is I have what is thought to be a factory delete
Stripe early 67RSSS. There is nothing on the cowl to reflect this. But I do have reference to this in some notes
That dealership salesman had made on car after order date. I feel that with the timeframe the car
was ordered, notes made and car delivered, that  and no reference of paint work done at dealer, that it was most likely done at factory.
But I'm still digging!
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: May 05, 2014, 06:50:35 AM
D90 was was part of the Z27 package in 67. To the best of my knowledge you are correct Gary. When you have ordered a package that includes the stripe it would not be listed. But as I am finding out it "may" be shown on the cowl tag, sometime in 67 with a 0-0 paint code, or a "-" toward bottom of tag right of options 68 and later.
My original question was how was this shown, what code was used, on window sticker. This I am being told was 1001AA Special Paint.
Is this correct?

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 14
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.387 seconds with 18 queries.