CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 01, 2014, 11:41:46 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102557 Posts in 12096 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: m20 bolt markings on: October 07, 2013, 12:23:30 PM
I have a 68 Muncie M20 and the cover bolts all have a letter L on the head seems to be common, the taillhousing bolts seems to be marked SBC

may look at this thread I was trying to determine what was original for my car
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=10583.0
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 radio delete plate and speaker carboard on: September 16, 2013, 05:46:00 PM
good stuff guys thanks !
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Oil Pressure Gauge Block Sender Fitting on: September 11, 2013, 07:38:40 AM

The plastic line will work with a nut replacement, but it needs the internal line sleeve per the manufacturer.
The nut/cone pinches down on the line.
OK that makes sense now, thanks!
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Oil Pressure Gauge Block Sender Fitting on: September 10, 2013, 04:04:27 PM
I am missing this item, if anyone has a spare pm please
OK I have this fitting now and has a bit of the old brass hardline and my car has a black plastic line to the guage that I thought was OE, is this correct? I have doubts that this will work now or not. I know the small flare nut isnt reuseable but will a new one work with the plastic line?
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 radio delete plate and speaker carboard on: September 06, 2013, 05:19:36 PM
Mark I bought a repop radio delete plate and its plain black I guess i need to see where i can get a vinyl that will match for it and John, you are the man with all your photos your a great help to the rest of us
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 1969 radio delete plate and speaker carboard on: September 06, 2013, 09:55:08 AM
I have added a late model radio and installed it in the glove box and was planning on adding a radio delete plate in place of the AM radio. My car has the woodgrain accents and the detete plate I have is just black plastic, would an original have the woodgrain? and even if not I would like to add it so it matches the driver side. also does anyone have pictures of the speaker blockoff cardboard and installed?  thoughts?
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Oil Pressure Gauge Block Sender Fitting on: August 30, 2013, 07:06:47 AM
I am missing this item, if anyone has a spare pm please
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Vacuum advance on: August 02, 2013, 10:49:11 AM
I posted these part numbers for the "B28" vacuum advance unit before, but I can't locate the post; ALL vacuum advance units are manufactured exclusively by Standard Motor Products, who sells them to branding wholesalers who re-box them with their own part numbers (but ALL are stamped by SMP with "B"-codes, which define their characteristics).

"B28" Vacuum Advance Units (start at 4" Hg., finish at 8" Hg.):

GM #88924985
AC-Delco #D1312C
Airtex #4V1053
BWD #V329
Standard #VC-177
Wells #DV1810
Niehoff #DR-305
Car Quest #57-7537
NAPA/Echlin #VC-1810
John I have searched and searched for those list of numbers you have compiled but they all lead to dead ends -Discontinued probably very few being sold these days so...see my replies listed in thread above,  the Carquest was all I could fine and was - get them while you can! I now have 2 B28 spares
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 69 1111480 distributor on: July 29, 2013, 12:41:32 PM
I found ALOT of information on vacuum advance cans on this site

http://www.lbfun.com/warehouse/tech_...ance_Specs.pdf
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Wiper blade refills on: July 15, 2013, 04:37:27 PM
Quote
These are the blades you can get from NAPA for about $9. They have the refills for about $5 a pair which I haven't got before. I may pick up a set to see what they look like. These blades certainly aren't assembly line correct but look and work great on my drivers.

John
OK not assy line correct but do the look close enough for a driver?
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: hugger orange z with green interior on: July 15, 2013, 04:25:23 PM
Authentic Firestone Wide Oval White Letter Tires? the Hugger vert I used to own had a white interior I like green but not that combo
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Halogen headlights with Rally Sport option on: July 05, 2013, 03:03:34 PM
I agree its a GM issue that age does not help- voltage drop to the headlights - too much resistance
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 69 1111480 distributor on: July 05, 2013, 11:23:51 AM
Old thread I know, I have looked and looked for the part numbers listed above and I have had 0 luck  Cry
i did find a Wells #  57-7537 that CarQuest was able to order for about 12$ ea I bought one and it spec'd out with my vacuum guage started moving at 3-4" and stopped by 8" - what are we going to do when these are no longer available? IMO this is a important part for tuning Z's

44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Flywheel Inspection Cover Paint on: June 28, 2013, 12:49:38 PM
I see that they are being repo'd now as the replacements are not correct I saw one on E-buy it was listed for vettes
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Removing "jet hot" from aluminum intake. on: June 19, 2013, 10:27:28 AM
It's possible that you may ruin the manifold trying to restore it. Try bead/media blasting it. If it doesn't work you will have to find another manifold to send to Jerry if you want to go back to original.
I agree try the beadblast first, if not I would source another manifold not having a non born with intake wouldnt kill you to me its more about block/heads ect plus date code cant be easily seen
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 18 queries.