CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 03:26:08 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106539 Posts in 12422 Topics by 4788 Members
Latest Member: capt68
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13
106  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / '68 door weatherstripping suggestions on: June 23, 2013, 12:14:45 PM
I am getting ready to order some of the weather stripping for my doors. I have a '68 with the deluxe interior and the wide stainless steel reveal belt moldings on the tops of the doors.

I am looking for some advise on what manufacturer(s) to use.

Right now, I am going to order:   The interior and exterior side window fuzzies (8 pieces)

                                                The three sided weatherstrip that goes around the sides and bottom of the doors.

                                                The u-shaped door jamb seal that attaches to the forward, top edge of the 1/4 panel.

I have read though many previous threads and it seems that Metro and Steele get the highest marks. And that nothing is perfect  (of course) and that they all some some short comings here or there.

On the fuzzies, I want to get what functions like and looks the most like factory original....and have the correct flat stainless steel bead on the interior pieces.

On the three sided piece around the doors, can anyone comment if the Metro "Supersoft Sponge" rubber is closest in appearance and feel to the original factory pieces?

On the u-shaped door jamb seals, they all sound about the same in their descriptions so I have no idea which to use.


107  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Mold damage on vinyl - fixable ??? on: June 20, 2013, 11:17:13 AM
I will try to do some massaging with my hands. It will be quite a while before it can go back in the car and be sat in.

108  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Mold damage on vinyl - fixable ??? on: June 19, 2013, 09:09:03 PM
First off, thanks to everyone for their suggestions.

Here's where I am so far. I bought the 303 Aerospace Protectant. I also picked up some 303 upholstery cleaner.

I cleaned the seat and appplied the protectant and then let it bake in the Florida sun for a couple of days.

It seems like the dimples have come out some......but not all the way. I have had the seat now inside in the air conditioning for a couple of days now to see if drawing any humidity out of it might make a difference but it looks the same.

I will try putting it out in the sun some more.

What I can't figure out is that all of my interior was all together in one spot and in the same conditions.  The all of the front and rear seats, the door panels and the rear side panels. Everything was covered with old sheets. The top of the rear seat back is the only area that got mold. (luckily) Everything else is fine.

109  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Mold damage on vinyl - fixable ??? on: June 12, 2013, 08:03:11 AM
Thanks to everyone for the replies. 
When you say "they came back out when the sun got on it," are you refering to the dimples like my seats have now?
110  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Mold damage on vinyl - fixable ??? on: June 11, 2013, 08:02:29 PM
First off let me say I live in Florida, the humidity capital of the world. All of my 68's interior had been stored in New York for many, many years and my car has been here in Florida being worked on. A couple of years ago, I brought all of the interior to Florida. For a lack of a better place to store it, just put it back inside of the car.

I sent my car to the paint shop a couple of months ago and had to empty it. My space inside my house is very limited so I put the seats in what we call a Florida room. It is an enclosed room attached to the house. It has plenty of windows and ventilation but no air conditioning. And it gets plenty hot in the summer. I had the seats wrapped on old sheets to protect them.

I pulled the sheets off of my back seat tonight just to check it's condtion and I got a big suprise. The top of the rear seat back was covered in mold. Really bad! I cleaned it off with a wet rag and then some upholstery cleaner........but then I got a bigger surprise..............

The mold had left depressions, like pock marks or craters, in the surface of the vinyl. Like sheet metal would look like if it got pelted with steel shot.

For being 45 years old, these seats were almost in pristine condition. When I saw those depressions, I almost wanted to cry.

I haven't checked everything yet but I think the damage is limited to just this seat back only.

SO MY QUESTION IS......has this ever happend to anyone and were you able to fix it. I was thinking of putting it in the sun tomorrow to see if it might smooth it out.....I don't know if that's a good idea or not......or maybe I should apply something to it that would help.

ps.....even if I have to put my bed outside to make space, I am putting all my interior inside in the air conditioning till it goes back in the car.

111  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 rear wheel molding placement on: June 11, 2013, 07:21:24 AM
Thanks so much for the information.

112  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 68 rear wheel molding placement on: June 09, 2013, 11:18:04 PM
I need help with placing of my 68 rear wheels moldings. My car has new repro quarter panels and outer wheelhouses which were installed a while ago. The joints where the quarter panel and the outer wheelhouses were welded together were bent down to far and have been corrected now. Now I am test fitting my original GM moldings to the wheel wells to make sure they fit together right.

I thought I marked my moldings pretty good when I took them off the original quarters but now I have my doubts as to which side is which. I know it should probably be obvious. I have attached pictures of both ends of one of my rear moldings and marked the ends A and B.

If someone can tell me which end goes towards the front of the car and which end goes towards the back, that will give me my answer.

There is another thing I need to figure out. You can rotate the rear moldings on the wheel well. There is no point on the car that corresponds to a point on the rear molding that tells you it is in exactly the right place. Not like the front. My original quarter panels are long gone for any kind of reference. I need a dimension from either the front or rear end of the molding to a point on the car that tells me exactly where they go. I looked in the AIM and it only gives dimensions for the front moldings so I am guessing the rears were put on my Fisher Body.


113  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 rear spoiler stud lenth needed on: May 26, 2013, 09:17:47 PM
Yes it does. That's exactly what I needed to know......and what I thought it should be.

114  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 rear spoiler stud lenth needed on: May 25, 2013, 03:09:57 PM
Thank you.....and yes, that is British Racing Green.

115  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 68 rear spoiler stud lenth needed on: May 25, 2013, 02:08:11 PM
Can some one tell me if the four long rear spoiler studs on a 68 ( the ones that are on the forward edge of the spoiler ) all stick out the same length of if the two in the middle should stick out longer.

I only have one of the original four longs studs left in it's original position. That is one on the end and it sticks out one inch. Of the two in the middle, one is gone and the other is the original factory stud but I had to reset it more than 20 years ago. That one is sticking out an inch and a half. It's been too long for me to remember why I did it that way. I don't remember if I was trying to match the original length or that just how I happened to set it.

Anyhow, I am going to be replacing the missing studs and want to set them at the correct lenth.


116  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Repro dash top installation dimension needed. on: May 25, 2013, 01:47:21 PM
I had a reproduction dash top put on my '68 and am now having trouble getting my original GM dash pad to sit down in place. The dash pad is sitting about 3/8 of an inch too high where it meets the dash face.

I am trying to figure out if the problem is with the reproduction dash top, the way it was installed, or both.

I am attaching a sketch of the cross section where the dash top meets the dash face. I am hoping someone who has their correct fitting dash pad off can check the measurement I am showing on their car and verify if my measurement is correct or wrong.



117  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 outside window fuzzies recommendation on: May 14, 2013, 09:40:12 AM
Thanks for the reply. That's good information. It's nice to hear of someone standing by their product. I will check them out.

118  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Fiber optic rear deck pod mounting holes on: May 14, 2013, 08:44:04 AM
Does anyone know or have the mounting holes diameters and spacing for the rear pod of the Vigilite (fiber optics) option on a 68? These are the three holes (one large and two small) drilled in the piece of metal between the rear package shelf and the rear window. That piece of metal was replaced on my car and the shop who did the work re-drilled the holes in the new piece but didn't get them quite in the right place. Off center and the pod sit a little crooked. I am thinking of plugging those holes and re-drilling them in the correct spot. I looked in the AIM which shows all the dimensions for the pods on the tops of the fenders but nothing for the rear. Maybe those holes were drilled by Fisher Body.

I  sure I can figure it out on my own but would like to see the dimensions if they are published somewhere.


119  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Wiper transmission rebuild necessary ??? on: May 13, 2013, 09:40:10 PM
I am wondering if my windshield wiper transmission is OK as is or needs attention. All of the three ball and socket joints are very free moving. All of the rivets are tight but there is no resistance to movement whatsoever. Two of the three joints have almost no play in the joint. Meaning when I try to move the ball around inside the socket, there is only the tinyest, barely noticeable, movement. The third joint however has some play. Maybe a little more than a 32nd of an inch when moving it side to side.

Is this normal and OK or do I need to do something about the joint with the play in it.

Should you use anything special to lubricate these ball and socket joints.

How about the rotating joint of the the wiper post. Does that need to be cleaned and lubed in any way. They rotate freely with a little resistance. I don't know if that is normal or not.

120  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 68 outside window fuzzies recommendation on: May 13, 2013, 09:06:21 PM
Does anyone have a recommendation on where to buy the outside window fuzzies for a 68 that has the reveal belt moldings on top of the door and quarter panel. I would like them to be as original as possible in looks and function.

I am not sure if I should order both the inside and the outside ones. I just need the outside ones for right now. My original inside fuzzies don't look too bad. That's hard for me to know for sure though without holding them along side of new ones to compare. I am not sure if they need replacing.

Rick's sells kits with the outsides only as well as kits for all of the inside and outside. I looked at Steel Rubber Products and it seems you have to buy the inside and outside together. Steele's seem pretty expensive too. And that's OK if they are excellent quality.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 13
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.093 seconds with 18 queries.