CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 11:54:42 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103794 Posts in 12188 Topics by 4701 Members
Latest Member: rts
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]
91  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Any Interest in Original Type Door Watershields? on: August 09, 2010, 07:54:21 PM
I'll take a half dozen sets FYI.Thanks,RSR
92  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: any way to restore brake and fuel line finish? on: April 29, 2010, 09:02:27 PM
I'd say unless you paint/coat them you'll be busy keeping the rust off.Some very good American made products are out there!!You can spend you time polishing the paint instead of the lines!! good luck!
93  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Fish story or not??? on: April 29, 2010, 08:54:48 PM
A YENKO ZL-1 was just on ebay last week with paper work from 1982.Somebody in Greensboro,NC bought it in 1982.
94  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Yenko ZL1 427 on: April 29, 2010, 08:48:01 PM
Wasn't most of them blocks used in boats? They had 2-3 different yenko logos on the front of the block also,right Joe??
95  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: The Paddock on: April 29, 2010, 08:42:31 PM
Just Think about ALL the restoration part vendors out there trying to make a buck!!They'll tell you anything to make a sell even if they sell something that don't exist.Most parts are coming from a hand full of manufactures that sell to ALL the vendors!This hobby keeps on getting tougher for eveyone it seems?
96  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Re-pop parts on: March 16, 2010, 09:15:20 PM
Didn't owe anything back in 2000 !!! And repo parts were easier to identify IMO.
97  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 factory big block proof on: March 14, 2010, 07:55:52 AM
He's talking asbout the POA valve on the evaporator.It sits on top of the ac housing and turns towards the inside on a BB?? It looks backwards from what you'd think IMO.Does anybody know why this was done that way??
98  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: OEM SUPPLIER OF VINYL TOPS IN 69 on: February 25, 2010, 10:49:05 PM
You can buy one about half that price from Kee Auto Top in Charlotte,NC.I know the tops they sell are used by some members/restorers in the supercar world !!
99  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69 302 block numbers and mains??? on: February 12, 2010, 08:02:45 PM
That same block was a 350 CI also
100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: OEM SUPPLIER OF VINYL TOPS IN 69 on: February 08, 2010, 08:10:43 PM
Kee auto top in Charlotte,NC is a OEM supplier.I don't have the number at the moment sorry!
101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: looking for someone to restore 1969 on: October 08, 2009, 11:45:03 AM
Remember one thing about restoring any car,it cost about the same to do a base 6cyl 15k car as it does to do a 427 150k car.That's what I've found in my 35 years in the business.Good luck!
102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Radiator code on: September 29, 2009, 11:59:01 AM
 I 'm looking for info on a 3 core radiator that was removed from a 69 camaro.It is a Harrison with a code of " OL" on the tank.It's also a manual radiator.Thanks,RSR
103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / LOS 11B VIN on: August 28, 2009, 11:57:12 AM
I'm wondering if my 69 camaro vin# L508665 was built in nov. 2nd week as the trim tag reads? Any ideas? Thanks for a great site!!
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.361 seconds with 18 queries.