CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 25, 2014, 02:07:36 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105762 Posts in 12346 Topics by 4757 Members
Latest Member: chelltab
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Dealer optioned 67 Camaro on: January 02, 2010, 08:09:55 AM

Hi there,

What should be the Transmission code on this vehicle's trim tag.

Cheers.



trim tag has no transmission letter in section 2 ? if it was a powerglide it would be M or muncie 4 speed it would be L
I don't think I've ever seen one with no transmission listed ?

32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Dealer optioned 67 Camaro on: January 01, 2010, 04:17:53 PM
NICE optioned 1967 RS/SS 396 ! cool option's rear defrogger , fold down seat ! remote mirror , COOL !
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 low fuel light? on: December 30, 2009, 04:29:42 PM
I took the console gauge top off and the low fuel sending module has a socket for a BULB/FUSE to push into it but it won't go into the mounting hole with a bulb in it and the gauge pod has never been messed with it never has had a bulb in it , light worked 10 year's ago when I got the car and stopped working about ? maybe 6 or 7 year's ago , I have decided that it is not ever gonna be worth $60 plus buck's of MY money for the light to work so if nobody ever come's up with a fix for my original now non working module that I can do out here in the yard for free the light will never work again ,, I'd give maybe $10 to $15 buck's for a working new module but $60 just ain't realistic for something that you don't need anyway ,,
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is Kurt there??? on: December 30, 2009, 06:22:09 AM
? what is it that your are talking about ?
you have found A ?? where did you find it ? and ohh yea what color is it ??
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1967 LOW FUEL MODULE ? CAN ONE BE REPAIRED ? on: December 27, 2009, 04:34:49 PM
Quote
As it turned out, the only problem I had was the low fuel module bulb. I did not know that the bulb in the socket served any purpose for the low fuel module.

With the ignition switch on and the Low Fuel light on, I pulled the bulb out of the socket and the ligt went out. I put the bulb back in the socket and the light came on. The bulb does not illuminate, but acts like a connection, I guess.

Can someone explain why GM used a bulb in this module? Or is this just look like a bulb and is not or what?


this guy say's the BULB/FUSE has to be in place for the light to work ?
 
 
 
 
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1967 LOW FUEL MODULE ? CAN ONE BE REPAIRED ? on: December 27, 2009, 09:48:21 AM
I've just learned that the fuel module has a FUSE ? or BULB ? in the back of it ? I am going to check that
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 low fuel light? on: December 27, 2009, 09:22:08 AM
Quote
Did you check to make sure the fuse like device that fits into the module is still good? Mine plugs in like a light bulb.

? did not know it had a fuse ? if I check it and its blown can you buy a new one ?
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Dealer optioned 67 Camaro on: December 26, 2009, 06:17:04 PM
you need to REPHRASE your question nobody understands what you are asking , after reading your post on here and on TC you need to ask CAN SOMEONE DECODE FACTORY INSTALLED OPTION'S like that , all the option's on the car invoice and on the trim tag are options that were installed at the factory , dealer installed options would be noted on the bottom of the car invoice under DEALER INSTALLED OPTION'S stuff like bumper guards / radio related items and so on could have been added to a car before it was sold ,
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 low fuel light? on: December 26, 2009, 06:12:33 PM
mine worked up till about 6 or 7 years ago , haven't been able to purchase the low fuel module to fix it with but I am gonna try again this year !
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Mandatory Front Discs with SS ? on: December 16, 2009, 03:48:50 PM
! I did not know that ! I guess I focus on 67's and let 68 69 detail's go undetected !
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Which is the closest 67 350 block replacement for SSRS conv? on: December 10, 2009, 06:52:39 PM
if you mean that it will tell someone how to make a TO CORRECT LOOKING replacement 1967 350 block and I did not mean it in a bad way the poster asked how to get the best block he could get without his original block this is in my opinion the best you could do ?
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Mandatory Front Discs with SS ? on: December 10, 2009, 06:48:00 PM
when this topic comes up AND IT COMES UP OFTEN ! I like to show this pic

43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Period correct engine value? on: December 07, 2009, 04:11:14 PM
cool , I like the 55 2dr hrdtp REAL GOOD !
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: how many 67 rs's had 250 6 cylinder on: December 07, 2009, 04:06:51 PM
got any pic's of the car ?
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Period correct engine value? on: December 06, 2009, 09:01:31 PM
best way to post pics is load them to photobucket then post them here , I bet that car had some a dem cool luminum slots too ! jack e'm up in the back paint the inner fender well's orange , shackle's in the back I bet !
I guess the movie corvette summer caused some of that !
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.095 seconds with 18 queries.