31
General Discussion / Re: Unrestored 1967 RS
« on: January 02, 2010, 05:04:53 PM »
YEP ! 2ND THAT ! gonna have to see some pic's ASAP !
BECAUSE ,,,,
BECAUSE ,,,,
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
Originality / Re: Dealer optioned 67 Camaro
« on: January 02, 2010, 01:09:55 PM »
Hi there,
What should be the Transmission code on this vehicle's trim tag.
Cheers.
trim tag has no transmission letter in section 2 ? if it was a powerglide it would be M or muncie 4 speed it would be L
I don't think I've ever seen one with no transmission listed ?
33
Originality / Re: Dealer optioned 67 Camaro
« on: January 01, 2010, 09:17:53 PM »
NICE optioned 1967 RS/SS 396 ! cool option's rear defrogger , fold down seat ! remote mirror , COOL !
34
Originality / Re: 67 low fuel light?
« on: December 30, 2009, 09:29:42 PM »
I took the console gauge top off and the low fuel sending module has a socket for a BULB/FUSE to push into it but it won't go into the mounting hole with a bulb in it and the gauge pod has never been messed with it never has had a bulb in it , light worked 10 year's ago when I got the car and stopped working about ? maybe 6 or 7 year's ago , I have decided that it is not ever gonna be worth $60 plus buck's of MY money for the light to work so if nobody ever come's up with a fix for my original now non working module that I can do out here in the yard for free the light will never work again ,, I'd give maybe $10 to $15 buck's for a working new module but $60 just ain't realistic for something that you don't need anyway ,,
35
General Discussion / Re: Is Kurt there???
« on: December 30, 2009, 11:22:09 AM »
? what is it that your are talking about ?
you have found A ?? where did you find it ? and ohh yea what color is it ??
you have found A ?? where did you find it ? and ohh yea what color is it ??
36
Restoration / Re: 1967 LOW FUEL MODULE ? CAN ONE BE REPAIRED ?
« on: December 27, 2009, 09:34:49 PM »Quote
As it turned out, the only problem I had was the low fuel module bulb. I did not know that the bulb in the socket served any purpose for the low fuel module.
With the ignition switch on and the Low Fuel light on, I pulled the bulb out of the socket and the ligt went out. I put the bulb back in the socket and the light came on. The bulb does not illuminate, but acts like a connection, I guess.
Can someone explain why GM used a bulb in this module? Or is this just look like a bulb and is not or what?
this guy say's the BULB/FUSE has to be in place for the light to work ?
37
Restoration / Re: 1967 LOW FUEL MODULE ? CAN ONE BE REPAIRED ?
« on: December 27, 2009, 02:48:21 PM »
I've just learned that the fuel module has a FUSE ? or BULB ? in the back of it ? I am going to check that
38
Originality / Re: 67 low fuel light?
« on: December 27, 2009, 02:22:08 PM »Quote
Did you check to make sure the fuse like device that fits into the module is still good? Mine plugs in like a light bulb.
? did not know it had a fuse ? if I check it and its blown can you buy a new one ?
39
Originality / Re: Dealer optioned 67 Camaro
« on: December 26, 2009, 11:17:04 PM »
you need to REPHRASE your question nobody understands what you are asking , after reading your post on here and on TC you need to ask CAN SOMEONE DECODE FACTORY INSTALLED OPTION'S like that , all the option's on the car invoice and on the trim tag are options that were installed at the factory , dealer installed options would be noted on the bottom of the car invoice under DEALER INSTALLED OPTION'S stuff like bumper guards / radio related items and so on could have been added to a car before it was sold ,
40
Originality / Re: 67 low fuel light?
« on: December 26, 2009, 11:12:33 PM »
mine worked up till about 6 or 7 years ago , haven't been able to purchase the low fuel module to fix it with but I am gonna try again this year !
41
General Discussion / Re: Mandatory Front Discs with SS ?
« on: December 16, 2009, 08:48:50 PM »
! I did not know that ! I guess I focus on 67's and let 68 69 detail's go undetected !
42
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Which is the closest 67 350 block replacement for SSRS conv?
« on: December 10, 2009, 11:52:39 PM »
if you mean that it will tell someone how to make a TO CORRECT LOOKING replacement 1967 350 block and I did not mean it in a bad way the poster asked how to get the best block he could get without his original block this is in my opinion the best you could do ?
43
General Discussion / Re: Mandatory Front Discs with SS ?
« on: December 10, 2009, 11:48:00 PM »
when this topic comes up AND IT COMES UP OFTEN ! I like to show this pic
44
Restoration / Re: Period correct engine value?
« on: December 07, 2009, 09:11:14 PM »
cool , I like the 55 2dr hrdtp REAL GOOD !
45
Decoding/Numbers / Re: how many 67 rs's had 250 6 cylinder
« on: December 07, 2009, 09:06:51 PM »
got any pic's of the car ?