CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 03, 2015, 11:36:15 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
110412 Posts in 12755 Topics by 4890 Members
Latest Member: jay1970
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 30
361  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: experience with Hooker 2131 super comps on Z28... anyone on: November 17, 2009, 04:36:06 PM
Be prepared to massage the tube closest to the steering box. I marked mine with a sharpie and modified it with a spark plug socket and a hammer.  Wink  No biggie.

I went back to the stock manifolds and chambered exhaust after that and those fit just fine.  Grin

362  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 302 bellhousing and starter not fitting?? on: November 15, 2009, 10:19:50 PM
The "621" was used on a few 350's and many big block muscle cars. They are more rare and desireable so they go for more $$$. The "403" was used on MANY applications and should sell for consideably less $$$.

I may be a bit out of touch but I would try to pay $50 for a "403" and about $150 for a "621" if I purchased them locally. Ebay will probably go for more.

363  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 302 bellhousing and starter not fitting?? on: November 13, 2009, 09:42:03 AM
The "621" bellhousing, 11"clutch, and 14" flywheel setup you have is not correct for a Z/28.

The "403" bellhousing, 12.75" flywheel and 10.5" clutch setup is correct. You can use the "621" but the starter nose cone, flywheel and clutch will ALL be different.

Try a BB nose cone if you dont want to go find the correct "403" setup. You can not mix-and-match these setups - ALL of the parts listed will need to match one setup or the other setup. Been there, done that.  Even the starter brace would be different. None of the parts you have will be technicaly correct except for the non-fitting starter. Sad

If it was mine, I  would sell the "621" for good money and find the cheaper and more plentiful "403" bellhousing, flywheel, clutch and use the starter you have so you don't have a "MUTT" car later on down the road. Smiley

364  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Window Handle Repair on: November 13, 2009, 09:29:55 AM
Check out the HELP section at your auto parts store for a close functional replacement knob. There is a decent replacement knob out there. Some of the resto parts houses have it but I have not used it before.

365  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: find door glass of camaro 1968 with ''ASTRO VENTILATION'' to engrave like compan on: November 13, 2009, 09:27:22 AM
How about this?

It is just a decal but it will work in a pinch.  You can buy a used piece of glass but shipping will be challenging.

366  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: if being "correct" was not a problem in your z28 on: November 12, 2009, 12:37:26 PM
A SHP 327 dressed up like a 302 would yield simmilar (better) performance with cheaper parts that are easier to find. Most people would never know the difference. Same sounds with slighlty more torque would keep the nostalgia feel to it.

I would want to keep some of the 302 "experience" that comes with owning the car. Smiley

367  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Door certification decal on: October 21, 2009, 05:12:35 PM
Not on a '69.

368  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Rear Springs on: October 20, 2009, 04:16:41 PM
Eaton Detroit was a good supplier. Have you tried them?

369  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 69 Z Voltage Regulator on: October 09, 2009, 08:08:58 AM
That makes sense. I have an October 68 build. My original rad support is long gone and I don't recall if the repro used the well nuts or not. Smiley

370  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 69 Z Voltage Regulator on: October 05, 2009, 11:57:51 AM
Why do I have it in my mind that there might be some rubber expansion mounts behind the regulator, like they use on one side of a radiator?Huh Am I just loosin it?

371  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Muncie 4 Speed Decoding on: October 05, 2009, 06:22:55 AM
The M20 and M21 refer to the internal gear ratios, more specificaly the ratio spread. The M20 is a wide ratio and the M21 is the narrow ratio. Both transmissions have the same 1:1 4th gear but the M21 has the ratios set up so the RPMs do not drop as much when you shift gears as compared to the wide ratio M20. If you have a torquey engine with power over a wide range the M20 is preferred. If you have a more high strung, high RPM powered car, the M21 was preferred. Speaking in general. Smiley

372  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: !!!NEED HELP BAD!!! - 1969 Camaro Wiring Gremlins on: September 29, 2009, 04:14:03 PM
It sounds like a ground problem to me. I would start by not re-engineering the battery cable hook up and put the cable where it was originally located on the inner fender. I know the rad support is bolted but you may not have a good conn between the support and the fender. The paint is probably in the way. It has rubber biscuits at the subframe so the only chance you have to make strong contact is the fender to support interface or maybe the hood latch would be enough?

Just my first instinct.

373  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 x33 console delete? on: September 13, 2009, 06:53:47 AM
I have an 04C 69Z with no Tach,guages. So it has to be later that the Tach/guage package became standard.

The 4 guage pack in the console with combined with Tach and Clock was allways optional.

After about May 19th, 1969 all '69 Z/28's had to have a Tach and Center Fuel Guage at a minimum OR they could order the Full 4 Gauge on the console with Tach and Clock.

So an early build did not have to have any extra instrumentation but a late build would have to have a tach via one of the two possible combinations.

374  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 x33 console delete? on: September 04, 2009, 07:40:06 AM
Pink and green sound like reverse light circuit. I bet you do not have any reverse lights when you back up. That is probably due to a header install at some time in the past 40 years or so.

375  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Firewall on: September 02, 2009, 07:47:14 AM
The Muncie equipped cars got a new hole in the firewall and the base tranny speedo hole was sealed with a black plastic caplug.

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 30
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 18 queries.