CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 26, 2015, 07:34:42 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
110288 Posts in 12742 Topics by 4884 Members
Latest Member: makemine69
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 31
376  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 Front Spoiler! on: January 21, 2010, 09:22:55 PM
Thanks.....had already read that one but it didn't mention anything about the production dates.  Just want to make sure that I get the one that would apply to my car build date.....or if it makes no difference then I'll get the later model.  Looks like the later one is heavier and it uses the braces so that it would probably hold up better....and it is usually cheaper.

Thanks again....
377  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1968 Front Spoiler! on: January 20, 2010, 11:29:53 PM
I know there were two front spoilers for the 1968, ( 3916673-The first one and I understand that it was just screwed to the valance panel ) and ( 3943249-The second one and I understand that it was supposed to use the braces 3943253 & 3943251 ).  My 1968 Z28, 07C, has the spoiler option ( D80) but didn't have the spoiler when I bought it,  but upon removing the valance panel from the front end I noticed that the screws that mounted the spoiler and a small piece of the plastic under the screws from the old spoiler remained.  I did not find any braces attached so I am presuming that it either had the first design spoiler or it had the second design and when the original spoiler departed that the first owner removed the braces.  I am about to purchase a new spoiler and  I want to get the right one that matches the  date of the car.

So....does anyone know when the first design was deleted and the second design was added to the production line, or even if the second design was ever added to the production line and was only available as a service part?  Also, are both of the spoilers classified as original to the car or is the first one, only, original to the car?

Any pictures showing both of the spoilers would be greatly appreciated.....just to make sure I get the right one.

Thanks in advance for any advice given....
378  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 30 30 cam on: January 19, 2010, 10:02:36 PM
If you are referring to a cam that is exactly equivalent to the old 30/30......I bought the Comp Cams kit #CL12-107-3.  This is a kit that includes the cam and lifters.  It has been highly recommended in the past.
379  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 302 fuel pump on: January 19, 2010, 05:08:22 PM
is the correct fuel pump # 40503 for the 67 302 ? Or is there a different one. Huh

Ron -

My '69 Chevrolet P&A list type 40524 (GM part #6416886) as the correct fuel pump for the '67 302.

380  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 302 Cu. In. Crate Motor Availability? on: December 26, 2009, 11:14:57 AM
Easy to build....Yes.   My main difficulty was finding the right pistons.
381  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Why is there some Z28's with 3908326 Rear Proportioning Valves and Some without on: December 23, 2009, 01:01:50 PM
No valve.....see signature for vehicle.
382  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z/28 open element air cleaner lid on: November 24, 2009, 12:13:29 AM
You sure that's the right thread?  All I say was tires and a spoiler.
Try page #58....that is where I found the air cleaners.
383  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: crank pulley bolts on: November 17, 2009, 08:26:55 PM
Paul......they should look like this

384  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: valve cover grommets 350 and 302 motors on: October 18, 2009, 10:45:19 AM
Here is 68ZProjects link that shows his 68Z and my 68Z looks the same as his and the are not the same as a 1969Z, I guess maybe they made a change with the aluminum valve covers.....
385  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Tie Rod Dust Seals! on: September 28, 2009, 09:59:08 AM
Does anyone have a good source for the tie rod dust seals that look like the originals?  I have found the urethane ones that fit but was looking for the original looking rubber ones.  My original tie rods are in great shape but a couple of the boots were torn and I hate to buy new tie rod ends just to get boots.  Any info will be greatly appreciated.....Thanks in advance.

386  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Exhaust Manifold dates on: September 22, 2009, 10:46:10 PM
My LH cast date:  F78
My RH cast date:  E218

Engine build date:  06/19/1968
387  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 Lower Grille Molding on: September 17, 2009, 03:15:17 PM
My April 1983 parts book says that #3914771 is the part number for the 1968 lower grille molding.
388  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Spray Washer Sand Blasting? on: August 17, 2009, 08:13:44 PM
Say Tim.....what size pressure washer were you using?

Thanks in advance....
389  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoration Shop for '68Z. on: August 13, 2009, 11:07:37 PM
Ken Lucas is second to none in the business!  I have known him for almost 20 years and his rates are very afordable.  I do all of the drive train stuff for Ken and we've had a great working relationship for many years.  Ask some of his customers.

All of the Lucas Motors cars have done very well in the "Legend" concours too.

Jerry.....Thanks for your comments.  Yes I am aware of the reputation of Ken and his crew.  I am always checking their site for photos to use as a reference.  Just never have contacted them for their advice or comments on my car.  In case you do check this post again I am going to reference a link to my posting over on TC that includes some info on the current status of the car as well as a link to a photo album of the car.  Any comments will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks again.......
390  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Spray Washer Sand Blasting? on: August 13, 2009, 10:49:29 PM
Yeah....decided it would be too big a mess.
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 31
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.091 seconds with 18 queries.