CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2014, 02:59:48 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105629 Posts in 12335 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46 ... 48
646  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Where was Date Code stamped on 67 Rear Quarters? on: April 21, 2010, 10:27:41 PM
  I have an 11A (66) built LOS Camaro coupe, the Rear Quarters were re-skinned before I purchased the car, but I am wondering if the Date Codes might be on the part that was not replaced.  IE; I read somewhere it might be on the edge under the deck lid.  Thanks for any help!
647  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 Header panel Date code stamp on: April 20, 2010, 11:42:27 AM
 Thanks John, I found a partial 4.  All other date codes that I have found are 42 or 43. I'm assuming the car was built around 45 (1 st. week of Nov.)
648  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 67 Header panel Date code stamp on: April 18, 2010, 07:03:12 PM
  Can someone tell me approximately where to look for the date code stamp on a 67 Header panel?  I'm pretty sure it is the original, but it is really Heavy surface rust on the underside.  I think I read somewhere that the underside of the Header Panel was Bare metal from the factory, which would explain why mine is so rusty.  Any help is much appreciated!  Thanks!
649  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: ID Tag on: April 13, 2010, 11:13:07 PM
I was told that the Metal tag was used on 10 bolt rear-ends, and that the Red Plastic tag on the plug was used on 12 bolts.
650  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 subframe on: April 13, 2010, 11:03:48 PM
  Hopefully someone else with alittle more knowledge than myself will see this post and shead more light on the subject.  In my estimation, I would say that a 12C built car would be getting near where the changeover was complete.  Meaning that it is most likely that your car would have had the Later style Sub-frame WITH the Tie-down holes.
651  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 subframe on: April 13, 2010, 03:03:50 PM
Rssstmac;  There is a research topic on here about the Early /Late '67 Sub-frame.  Go back click on Research Topics, then scroll down to '67 Topics.  The changeover period was No./Dec. of'66.  I have a 1 st. week Nov. LOS built coupe that has the "early" type(no holes.
652  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / What is the best way to strip Front Coil springs? on: March 16, 2010, 04:09:32 AM
   I am doing a cpmplete restoration of my early (no holes) Sub-frame.  What is the best way to strip my front Coil springs.  I have been told that sandblasting will take tempering out of the spring, is this true?   Will chemical stripping hamper the tempering?  These are the originals, and the car sat good prior to dismantling.  I don't think they have "weakened" over the years.  Thanks for any advice!!!
653  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: z28 harmonic balancer? on: March 09, 2010, 10:34:44 PM
What Balancer did the'67 - 302 use?  Was it the same as the 350?
654  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Original finish on 67 exhaust hangers on: February 22, 2010, 01:12:58 AM
  What was the original finish on '67 exhaust hangers?  I have seen pictures(supposedly original) where it looks like they were painted semi-gloss black.  In catalogs I have seen ones that look natural bare metal, and I have seen Cad.? plated, what is correct?  Thanks for any help.
655  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67/68 vs. 69 Rear Spoiler on: February 16, 2010, 10:16:48 PM
  After much research I have come to the conclusion that what I have is a GM NOS(in box) '68 spoiler #3916633.  I found the answer to my own question above, 59 in. for the '68 vs. 61 in. for the '69.  Thanks for your help guys!
656  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67/68 vs. 69 Rear Spoiler on: February 14, 2010, 03:41:16 PM
Can someone tell me the difference in width of the rear 1/4's ?
657  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 67/68 vs. 69 Rear Spoiler on: February 13, 2010, 10:25:37 PM
  I recently read in Motorbooks  Camaro Restoration Guide that a '69 Rear Spoiler will not work on a '67 Camaro, is this correct?
658  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Where to buy "correct appearing" ball joints? on: January 09, 2010, 12:22:21 AM
 On my '67 Upper Ball Joints I used 5/16 in. Button Head bolt(Readily available locally).  Then filled the Hex indent. with Bondo and hand painted it with Cast Blast.  Looks good.  I've attached a photo.
659  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Quarter panel stampings on: December 13, 2009, 12:03:22 AM
  What year car are you referring to?   You prabably are looking at Date cades.   The codes are stamped into metal approx. 1/8 in. tall letters, should be a letter (probably R), a space and a 2 digit #(refers to week of build).  My 11A -66 build '67(approx. week 44) has a T 43 trunk lid, a H 43 right door. and a H 42 left door.   The rear quarters have been reskinned,(before I got the car) so sorry I can't help you there.  Kurt gave me the info.(probably- R ##)
660  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Early 67 Trunk Date code on: November 25, 2009, 02:17:55 PM
I got to look at the date code on my original trunk lid today(it has been in storage) the code is T 43.   Some time back I had posted the doors, they are Rt. H 43, and Lft. H 42.   I also found a code stamped in to the outside Pass. side of my Sub-frame when cleaning it up.  I now believe that might also be a Date code, I believe it is I 42.  this stamp is the same size as other Date codes I have found. There is also a larger(1/4")  O R stamped by this code.  Is this probably a Date code?   It is approx. 9" from the rear of the Sub-frame, approx. the middle of the outside of the frame.   Thanks for any input.
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46 ... 48
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.11 seconds with 18 queries.