CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 04:35:44 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102505 Posts in 12092 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46
646  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 67 Standard Grille on: October 02, 2009, 04:31:49 AM
  I am restoring my '67 standard Grille.   I am using an NOS #3891693 center Grille.   The Grille has 3 extra tabs with no holes in them on one edge of the backside, do these tabs go on the top or on the bottom?   Thanks for any help!
647  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 67 Lower Grille Molding on: September 17, 2009, 02:54:05 PM
  I am looking at a Lower Grille molding on EBay for '67 Standard Grille.  Picture looks to be for lower grille it is NOS in box part # 3914771.   The Camaro AIM states #3891692.  Did they change the part# somewhere along the line?
648  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Early '67 Power steering box on: September 10, 2009, 12:17:25 AM
  I am currently in the process of doing a complete restoration of my Early (no holes in frame horns)'67 Sub-frame.  Today I was cleaning up the Power Steering box, so I have some #'s for you if you're interested.   The car is an 11A (66) LOS built.   It has (according to your report the correct;   5691676 casting.  It has a 266 casting date, on the cover it has 276 6 (I believe that is actual build date?)(and would be 276 day of 66?)   Which I believe would be correct for the 11A build date of the car?   There is a 13 stamped under the 5691676, I'm not sure what that means.   I hope this info. is helpful.
649  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Early '67 Sub-frame on: August 24, 2009, 11:43:17 PM
  I was doing some cleaning of my Sub-frame this weekend and found some (partial) stamped codes of somekind on the outside of the Pass. side frame-rail.   I have included a sketch of what it looks like.  I think part of it is too faint to show in a picture. 
650  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Production #'s for Column shifted Powerglide on: August 22, 2009, 10:51:04 PM
  Actually I was thinking that Floor shift was not standard on SS's.   I know of a SS 396 Conv. with Bench Seat, Fold-down Rear seat, and Auto. on the column.
651  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Heater Box Pal nut coating on: August 22, 2009, 10:47:51 PM
   Can someone tell me what was the correct coating on the Heater Box Pal nuts?   I have cleaned mine up pretty good, without used chemicals or sandblasting, and they look to have been Black Phosphate.   All replacements I have seen look to be Nickel or Silver Cad. plated.   Thanks for any help.
652  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Early '67 Sub-frame on: August 18, 2009, 03:03:39 AM
  I have attached a photo of the Door frame, I think you can tell it has the phone indentation and 5 long skinny indentations.  As for stampings, the quarters have been re-skinned, as well as new outer Wheelhouse.  I have the old trunk lid in storage, I'll have to check the stamping next time I'm there.   I do remember it had both the Chevrolet script and the little rectangular camaro emblems.
653  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Production #'s for Column shifted Powerglide on: August 17, 2009, 06:15:37 PM
   Maybe I haven't looked in the right place.   I don't find a report that separates '67 Column shifted Powerglide from Floor shifted.   I wasn't curious until I saw this '67 Camaro listed on EBay, very similar optioned car.   Claims that there were only 600 built with a column shifted Powerglide.  I was wondering where he found that #.   Doesn't seem to me that the base V-8(327 - 2 bbl.) with a Column shifted base Auto. trans. would be all that rare.   Any input is appreciated!
654  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Correct starter for '67 - 327 on: August 16, 2009, 11:51:27 PM
  I have found conflicting #'s for the right starter for my '67 - 327 2bbl..    Camaro Restoration Guide (Motorbooks) says #1108367,  AIM lists #1107496 for Hi-perf. & Man. trans., and my Cars & Parts Chevy V-8 Engine casting #'s (55-93) lists #1107320.   Can anyone tell me what is right?   The original 327 actually had a '65 - 6 cyl. starter #1107259 on it when I got the car.  I was surprised to find that these were inter-changeable.   Thanks!
655  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Early '67 Sub-frame on: August 16, 2009, 11:37:58 PM
  I am sending post in reply to info. on early '67 Sub-frame report.   My R-R(Bolero Red) '67 was built 11A (66) in LOS, it is basically a standard Coupe(12437) with 327 - 2 bbl. with Powerglide, Tinted Windshield (only),cowl tag Reads like this;
        11A               A638
  ST  67-12437 LOS 8032   BODY
  TR  760-Z               R-R   PAINT
        W  2M
   It has the early Sub-frame horns (no holes),  also I'd like to add that it has the metal Bucket seat backs.  hope this adds to your report.   

656  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct 67 Control Arm Shaft on: August 08, 2009, 08:56:50 PM
Thanks, Jon!   So I'm now assuming that my early LOS car is correct with one of each.   Brings me to another question now,  was one more prevalent on one side or other?   OR, doesn't really matter.   I really didn't notice any difference when I took them off, just when I got them back and laid them side by side.  Thanks again for all your help!
657  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Correct 67 Control Arm Shaft on: August 05, 2009, 02:11:13 AM
I am in the process of doing a complete restoration of my early '67 Sub-frame.  Per the report here it matches all the spefics of an earlly '67 Sub-frame. (ie; no holes on inside of frame"horns")   I have completely dis-assembled the front suspension.  I just received the Control Arms(A-frames) and Control Arm shafts back from having all the bushings pressed out.   And I just noticed the 2 shafts are different.  1 is more straight across the top and bottom edges, and 1 is more "dog-bone" shaped.  The first has some Gm part #'s -381904 GM 35 D on one side, and 1038 on the other.  the second has no part #'s that I can see.  I am attaching a picture.  I believe that first or top shaft in picture is the correct shaft, can anyone confirm this?   Thank you!!!!
658  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1967 - Orphans / Re: 67 Invoice's on: July 01, 2009, 12:49:14 AM
Do you have any LOS invoices?   I have 124377L113583,  I have found the partial Vin on the inside of the Heater Blower Motor and it matches.  I can send picture of the Cowl tag if you need.   Thanks1
659  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: AR stamped on Plug Wire Looms on: June 23, 2009, 12:00:21 AM
So who was the supplier, AR?   anybody know?
660  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / AR stamped on Plug Wire Looms on: June 21, 2009, 12:12:46 AM
  I have what I believe are the original Spark Plug wire looms for my '67 Camaro 327.   The 2-wire Looms that fasten to the out side Valve Cover hold-down bolts have an AR stamped on them.   Can somebody tell me what this AR stands for?   Thanks.
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 18 queries.