CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2014, 03:37:21 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106496 Posts in 12421 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 48
556  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Head/Block/Intake/Exhaust casting on: May 14, 2011, 01:19:54 AM
victorsam>  I have a 11A LOS built Coupe no where near as well optioned as yours, but it has the original drivetrain, including the 657 cast block.  Mine was a 210 hp. 2 bbl. with a Powerglide trans. behind it, build date on mine is J 17 6.  Much closer to build date of car, I agree with what someone else stated, that by this time the dates should be ccloser together.  I think someone else posted, you will not find a partial VIN.# unless it was originally a HP engine.
557  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring original TRICO Wiper arms on: May 03, 2011, 01:19:20 PM
Thanks John!
558  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring original TRICO Wiper arms on: May 02, 2011, 12:47:15 PM
Would that be on all '67 models, or beginning in calendar year '67?  My car is an 11A - '66 build.  Thanks!
559  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring original TRICO Wiper arms on: May 02, 2011, 12:09:41 AM
   In my research I'm finding conflicting description on what finish is correct for '67, bright polished, or satin?  What is correct?  I'm seeing a lot of places just offer same repop for 67-68-69, some offer satin, some offer bright.   Again, what is correct?
560  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Restoring original TRICO Wiper arms on: April 29, 2011, 02:02:11 AM
  Has anyone here tried restoring original TRICO Windshield Wiper Arms?  My originals are straight, and in pretty good shape, but the Chrome on the "knuckle" is pretty dull.  I found a place where I can get the rivet, that fastens the Stainless arm to the "knuckle".  I have some other pieces I need to have plated, and thought I would do these too if it's not too much hassle.  AND if it's worth the bother.  Any help, or opinions appreciated.  Oh, forgot to add, this is a fairly early '67.  And I'm keeping it as much original as possible.  Thanks!
561  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 14, 2011, 01:01:17 AM
>> Bryon;
   I am attaching a pic. of the front Driveshaft Yoke straight on.  If you can decipher the part # you're better than me.  This is actually a pretty good pic., #'s are just real hard to decipher.  I'm guessing, but are the last 3 #'s on bottom row part of date code?  I don't know how they coded these yokes, but my Steering Gear Box was day 276.  Don't suppose this helps much, but it's the best I can do.
562  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 69 rear end on: April 14, 2011, 12:07:52 AM
Here's a good pic. of the Vent tube in place.
563  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 / 68 Heater Control on: April 12, 2011, 11:05:40 PM
Thanks Ed, very helpful !
564  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 12, 2011, 10:37:58 PM
>>>bcmiller;
   I am going to post another picture I took of the Driveshaft with measurements, I am going to use this as a diagram to restore the Driveshaft back to original condition.
565  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 / 68 Heater Control on: April 12, 2011, 12:16:51 AM
 I just recently found out that even though interchangeable, original 67 and 68 Heater Controls are not the same, they have different color background.   original 67's are black, and 68's supposedly blue, is this correct?  If so what are the repops like?
566  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Heater Control Lens on: April 12, 2011, 12:07:55 AM
Sorry, I just realized you're talking knobs only.  Yes, I think they are all interchangeable.
567  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Heater Control Lens on: April 12, 2011, 12:04:04 AM
@>BlackoutSteve;
  67 and 68 Heater Controls fasten into the dash in a horizontal position, 69's are vertical.  Definately not the same.  I just recently found out that even though interchangeable, original 67's and 68's are not the same, they have different color background.  As for 69 thru 81 being interchangeable, maybe.  Same?  Doubtful.
568  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 07, 2011, 10:36:49 PM
I forgot to add it has U-bolts to attach the rear universal to the Rear-end input shaft.
569  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 07, 2011, 10:34:28 PM
  You have perfect timing, that's right where I'm at with my restoration.  My car is a '67 V8 Coupe, 11 A, Los Angeles built.  Has the standard 327 - 2 bbl. engine with Powerglide trans.. The Driveshaft length is 50 in..  I have not found the Casting #( I assume it's on the end flange)(I haven't got that far cleaning)  The Rear end tube Code reads: PW 0919 G.  The paint stripes are Orange/White(I've included a pic.)  And the U-joint flanges are Clocked.  Let me know if you really need that Casting#..
570  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Firewall Insulation fasteners on: April 06, 2011, 08:27:26 PM
  I am wondering how many fasteners were used to attach the Firewall Insulation on a early '67 Coupe W/O Air.  I'm getting some conflicting information.  Some of the Dealers say you need 4, I'm looking at the 67 AIM - UPC 1  pg. A6.5  it shows only 3.  I saved 2 taking the car apart, the one in the middle and the 1 lower right in the diagram.  And I believe I found the hole for the one at top
above the accelerator.  Any body out there know, is the AIM correct?  Or is there another one somewhere?
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 48
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.091 seconds with 18 queries.