CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 01, 2015, 05:46:48 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109380 Posts in 12661 Topics by 4867 Members
Latest Member: 69z-x77
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 39 ... 50
541  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Standard #3755820 Pulley finish? on: October 23, 2011, 11:18:22 PM
OK, so how do I restore the Gray Phosphate?
542  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Standard #3755820 Pulley finish? on: October 23, 2011, 09:45:57 PM
   I have Jerry's 67 Definitive Z28 book, it does not have list you referred to.  But I found it here;  http://www.67z28.com/finishes.htm   
 I printed it out, and have used it a LOT.   If you go to Pulley, crankshaft:  you will see; Camaro Nationals says Natural,  and  McNeish Book says 60 % gloss black paint or gray phosphate acceptable.  My original has clearly never had paint on it.  I used nothing but degreaser and small detail wire brush to clean it.  I am going to post a couple pics.  On the back you can make out the outline of  Y from the front of the Harmonic Balancer and you can clearly see it never had paint.  BTW, my car is a 11A 66 LOS build, that may make some difference.
543  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 Standard #3755820 Pulley finish? on: October 23, 2011, 07:51:53 PM
  I just finished cleaning up my original #3755820BC standard SB Crankshaft Pulley, it doesn't look like it ever had paint on it.  It looks like almost a natural cast or bare metal color.  Did these have some kind of a coating on them?   I find it hard to believe it was not more rusty if it was just bare metal.
544  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 RS Vert > QUESTION - OPINIONS on: October 22, 2011, 02:04:43 AM
I think the uneven #'s on the odometer would indicate it has either rolled over, or has been turned back.
545  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 RS Vert > QUESTION - OPINIONS on: October 21, 2011, 10:06:42 PM
This car would not have had the D91 stripe from the factory.   10C build,  the D91 stripe was only available on SS until Mar. of 67.  it looks nice though.
546  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Radiator support on: October 18, 2011, 09:59:17 PM
69Zproject>>Top pic. are we looking at the Radiator support from the front?  If so, you will install the AMK Pierce nut from the front, wide part out and narrower part in.  You will probably have to give it a little "LOVE" tap to get it completely in place.  You could just bolt it together at this point.  I would (or did, where I used them) put a heavier Hammer on this wider side, and then "peen" the corners a little on the other side to make a more permanent  fix.  Less chance of the nut coming loose if you would ever take apart again sometime.
547  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 Camaro RS SS Convertible on: October 18, 2011, 01:17:17 AM
  If you know how check for the Block Casting #,  casting #3892657 was used for both 327 and 350(also 302)   Difference was the stroke of the Crankshaft.   The Main Journals were Align Honed out to the larger size for the 350 crankshaft.   Another difference though, Higher Performance engines(350 &302) had a partial Vin. stamped on the front pad.  The 327's didn't.
548  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 RS Options on: October 10, 2011, 05:39:01 PM
Those wheels are off a '94 - '97 Chevy S-10 or GMC S-15 2 wheel drive, they're the standard wheel.
549  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 COPO RS Camaro for sale $100,000.00 on: October 10, 2011, 11:39:15 AM
  This thread has gotten very interesting.  First, this COPO in previous post has ALL original Drivetrain and certified by Jerry M..  Even original type rubber.   The other 2 COPO's in the 2nd. link are ZL1's, different ballpark.  So, Don I love your car, that said, it has NONE of the original Drivetrain.  The tires are definately not original type.  The Rally Wheels are nice, are they original?   I think you have to figure in the FUN factor on this car.  As Don said this is are Driver, you can take it out and have some REAL fun with it.  At the end of the day IF it breaks, it can be replaced.  What kind of pricetag can you put on that?
550  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Found a 69 - Rare Butternut Yellow with YELLOW HOUNDSTOOTH on: October 02, 2011, 07:43:01 PM
I see X11 on the Cowl Tag could this be a Z/28 or SS?
551  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Original Windshield for '69 on: September 30, 2011, 10:58:56 PM
  I can verify psautoglass.com I got a Dated Windshield there for my early '67 Coupe, it is right on.  Guys name is Mike Wimmer he is very knowledgeable on these date codes.  Located in Janesville, WI. just south of Madison.  I live right in the area, was able to save shipping.   My car also had all original glass, but windshield was  cracked.
552  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Radiator support on: September 27, 2011, 06:03:31 AM
The nut in the top pic. is called a pierce nut.  They were used in several places on a '67 Camaro.  And I believe they were used on the Radiator support.  AMK Products does carry them part #B-10558 for the 5/16 size, they are $4 for 6, problem is though AMK requires a $30 minimum order.  I purchased some and I have a couple extras if you're interested e-mail me.  I'll be reasonable on $.
553  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Mystery part on: September 24, 2011, 09:00:55 PM
Sauron>>> WouldDuramix part #4274 be the right stuff?
554  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Mystery part on: September 24, 2011, 01:14:40 PM
Would that NVH be the 1/8 in. thick foam like sheet of stuff on the stiffener?  Is that adhesive on both sides?  Where can you get it?
555  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Mystery part on: September 23, 2011, 08:34:17 PM
Ditto, Sauron.  I'm in the process of replacing Quarters on my '67 Coupe as we speak, and was able to save both of parts you're talking about.  Imagine my surprise when i found a Date code on the little stiffener at the rear corner of the Quarter window.
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 39 ... 50
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.