CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 21, 2014, 09:50:04 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97309 Posts in 11695 Topics by 4579 Members
Latest Member: dnroe
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 39 ... 44
541  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: '67 camaro coupe, 327ci, 2B Carb., powerglide 2 SP on: August 07, 2010, 03:50:01 PM
  I am dealing with this exact same situation, I will be watching this post closely!!  I'm pretty sure the carb. is correct for the car, I'm interested in rebuilding it, including finding somewhere to get a correct tag stamped.
542  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 vent window frames on: July 30, 2010, 11:11:47 PM
jimbo67rag;  Don't know if anyone answer this.  I believe that it goes spring 1 st., then fiber washer, then that odd shaped metal washer(flat on 1 side & slot in middle), then the nut.  You should be able to tighten it up enough so it doesn't swing freely.   Hope this helps.
543  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Black Firewall Paint on: July 30, 2010, 10:31:34 PM
I agree with firstgenaddict, there was a normative practice, but there were anomolies.  First, MOST of the people working on the assembly lines were not a bit concerned about the collectability of these cars.  I did a post about a year ago (Correct Seat Belts) for my Early- 11A  build '67.  I have a complete matched set of date correct Seat Belts that came out of my car.  Everything is correct, except for one thing, they are ROBBINS.  I've been told that ROBBINS were never installed in Camaros.  I KNOW they have not been changed in the past 24 yrs. ('86)and maybe even 3 more years before that.  Who, would change a whole complete set of seat belts, and make sure they were date correct???   And, would they pull a  car from the line for seat belt if they knew they could substitute others with the exact same specs. Huh?  I am planning to restore and use these belts, because I believe the car left the factory with them.  I know this situation does not pertain to this topic exactly, Just saying I agree 100% with firstgenaddict.
544  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Any Interest in Original Type Door Watershields? on: July 30, 2010, 08:09:55 PM
I'm in for a set of '67 standards.
545  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Date Coded Glass on: July 30, 2010, 06:03:57 PM
  RIGHT ON!!!   Just picked up my dated windshield for my 11A built '67 Coupe, that's all I can say is it is right on the money compared to the original.   I am very pleased.  This Forum is awesome, it has helped in so many ways already.  This company PS Auto Glass, was reccomended  by Jerry M. (see above reply)and it is right in my area.  I picked it up.   AWESOME !   Thanks everyone!
546  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Black Firewall Paint on: July 30, 2010, 04:47:12 PM
Pex68;  Is that your Firewall date code below the partial VIN in next to last pic.?   That's where mine was, partially covered with caulk.
547  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Black Firewall Paint on: July 30, 2010, 04:18:05 PM
Buddy:  I have an 11A(66) built LOS car and it has the hidden partial VINs, and they match.  Everything else on this car has checked out, ie: date codes, and part #'s.  This is the first I have ever heard that '67's didn't have the hidden partial Vin.
548  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct subframe bolts on: July 28, 2010, 11:24:35 PM
HOGDADDY;  I have an "early" (11A -66) '67 Coupe, and it has the 4 Sub-frame bolts like you pictured in your original post with the indented head and shoulder washer, and pointed.  These 4 are 5/8 in. X 3 in. long, I believe the Core support bolts should look the same, except they are only 1/2 in. X 3 in..  I believe mine are all original to the car.  I'm seeing all Repop's of the Sub-frame bolts with No indented head, No shoulder washer, and no Point on the other end - and they are claiming these correct, so I'm wondering if they changed somewhere along the way.  Good luck sorting this out.
549  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Manual to Disc Upgrade... do I affect originality? on: July 23, 2010, 03:33:50 PM
@nuts4coke, forgot to mention in last post.  If you're trying to stay original, you need to replace the Drivers door mirror, thats a '68.   It should have around one, and from feedback and research I've done our "Early" '67's should have the Bowtie on the back.
550  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Manual to Disc Upgrade... do I affect originality? on: July 23, 2010, 02:19:05 PM
@nuts4coke,  my car is about 95% original, engine, tranny, rear-end.   I have found codes on several panels (see post on restoration here) My car had the intake and carb. changed to a newer 70's 2 bbl.(don't know why), I have found correct pieces to replace those to original.  I have verified the partial VIN. #.   I have just located the registration card for who I believe was the 2 nd. owner, should be relatively easy to track back to first owner and possibly dealer from there(wish me luck).  Car has always been registered in Illinois I believe.  I actually think I know dealer but would like to verify and authenticate it.  My plans are to upgrade the car so I can enjoy it, but keep all original parts for (future?Huh?)   Like you I have no intention of ever selling this car, I intend to "pass it down" within the family.  I don't think I said this car was built the week of my Birthday in '66, makes it a little more special to me.
551  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring Inside Raer View Mirror on: July 22, 2010, 04:48:47 PM
  Any place I've looked, including Rick's, the 67-68 Inside mirrors are listed as the same.  I've even seen some OE's listed as same.  But '69 must be different.  However, the bracket that the mirror attaches to seems to have changed in '68 and is the same as '69.
552  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Manual to Disc Upgrade... do I affect originality? on: July 22, 2010, 04:15:47 PM
Hey nuts4coke, sounds like your car is much like mine.  Pretty much standard V8 Coupe, with Tinted Windshield (only), Powerglide, P. Steering, AM Radio, and Full Wheel hubcaps.  Bolero Red with Black Standard Buckets.  What color is yours.  Personally I'm going with the P. Disc front brakes, I'm going to use a kit from Right Stuff, Jerry M. says they are very good.   
553  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Looking for owners with original early build '67 cars on: July 22, 2010, 04:04:09 PM
nuts4coke --Thanks!!!
554  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 AIM 6 B2 on: July 19, 2010, 10:59:31 PM
  Duh, Senior moment there.  I got to thinking that I've seen several blank pages in the 67 AIM, I have.  Don't necessarily mean that anything is missing.
555  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 AIM 6 B2 on: July 19, 2010, 10:49:42 PM
  Mines blank too.  What's supposed to be on that page?
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 39 ... 44
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.079 seconds with 18 queries.