CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 30, 2014, 07:12:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104953 Posts in 12264 Topics by 4727 Members
Latest Member: Z10 Paceman
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 46
526  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Firewall Bracket (lower) for 67? on: June 01, 2011, 01:05:47 AM
  Just found my own answer,  firewheelclassics.com  has them under New Products.  Thanks anyhow guys!!!!
527  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Firewall Bracket (lower) for 67? on: May 31, 2011, 11:29:09 PM
  Anyone on here know if someone makes this Firewall Bracket (lower) for a 67/68?  I find it listed (Rick's and others) for a 70/73, but can not find one for a 67.   This would be the bracket that the middle Sub-frame mount bolt to.  My Firewall is solid, and actually only the bottom 3 or 4 inches of this bracket is rusted bad.  The actual point where the Sub-frame mounts is solid.  The very lower part of the '70/'73 bracket looks very similar, I was considering buying one of them and just cutting the section I need and welding it in.  Any help/thoughts are much appreciated.
528  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Head/Block/Intake/Exhaust casting on: May 14, 2011, 01:19:54 AM
victorsam>  I have a 11A LOS built Coupe no where near as well optioned as yours, but it has the original drivetrain, including the 657 cast block.  Mine was a 210 hp. 2 bbl. with a Powerglide trans. behind it, build date on mine is J 17 6.  Much closer to build date of car, I agree with what someone else stated, that by this time the dates should be ccloser together.  I think someone else posted, you will not find a partial VIN.# unless it was originally a HP engine.
529  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring original TRICO Wiper arms on: May 03, 2011, 01:19:20 PM
Thanks John!
530  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring original TRICO Wiper arms on: May 02, 2011, 12:47:15 PM
Would that be on all '67 models, or beginning in calendar year '67?  My car is an 11A - '66 build.  Thanks!
531  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring original TRICO Wiper arms on: May 02, 2011, 12:09:41 AM
   In my research I'm finding conflicting description on what finish is correct for '67, bright polished, or satin?  What is correct?  I'm seeing a lot of places just offer same repop for 67-68-69, some offer satin, some offer bright.   Again, what is correct?
532  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Restoring original TRICO Wiper arms on: April 29, 2011, 02:02:11 AM
  Has anyone here tried restoring original TRICO Windshield Wiper Arms?  My originals are straight, and in pretty good shape, but the Chrome on the "knuckle" is pretty dull.  I found a place where I can get the rivet, that fastens the Stainless arm to the "knuckle".  I have some other pieces I need to have plated, and thought I would do these too if it's not too much hassle.  AND if it's worth the bother.  Any help, or opinions appreciated.  Oh, forgot to add, this is a fairly early '67.  And I'm keeping it as much original as possible.  Thanks!
533  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 14, 2011, 01:01:17 AM
>> Bryon;
   I am attaching a pic. of the front Driveshaft Yoke straight on.  If you can decipher the part # you're better than me.  This is actually a pretty good pic., #'s are just real hard to decipher.  I'm guessing, but are the last 3 #'s on bottom row part of date code?  I don't know how they coded these yokes, but my Steering Gear Box was day 276.  Don't suppose this helps much, but it's the best I can do.
534  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 69 rear end on: April 14, 2011, 12:07:52 AM
Here's a good pic. of the Vent tube in place.
535  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 / 68 Heater Control on: April 12, 2011, 11:05:40 PM
Thanks Ed, very helpful !
536  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 12, 2011, 10:37:58 PM
>>>bcmiller;
   I am going to post another picture I took of the Driveshaft with measurements, I am going to use this as a diagram to restore the Driveshaft back to original condition.
537  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 / 68 Heater Control on: April 12, 2011, 12:16:51 AM
 I just recently found out that even though interchangeable, original 67 and 68 Heater Controls are not the same, they have different color background.   original 67's are black, and 68's supposedly blue, is this correct?  If so what are the repops like?
538  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Heater Control Lens on: April 12, 2011, 12:07:55 AM
Sorry, I just realized you're talking knobs only.  Yes, I think they are all interchangeable.
539  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Heater Control Lens on: April 12, 2011, 12:04:04 AM
@>BlackoutSteve;
  67 and 68 Heater Controls fasten into the dash in a horizontal position, 69's are vertical.  Definately not the same.  I just recently found out that even though interchangeable, original 67's and 68's are not the same, they have different color background.  As for 69 thru 81 being interchangeable, maybe.  Same?  Doubtful.
540  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: April 07, 2011, 10:36:49 PM
I forgot to add it has U-bolts to attach the rear universal to the Rear-end input shaft.
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 ... 46
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.