CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 23, 2014, 01:00:30 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102284 Posts in 12073 Topics by 4661 Members
Latest Member: 23bull
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 46
496  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Keys for my 67 on: August 29, 2011, 07:22:56 PM
>>>IZRSSS,  those yellow marks are just Photoshop to block the codes.  They are not on the keys.  Have to be careful these days, you don't know who's looking.
497  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Original Keys for my 67 on: August 29, 2011, 02:42:55 PM
  To my pleasant surprise I just found a set of original keys to my 67, and they have the "knockouts" intact with #'s which match the #'s on the side of the locks.(I currently have all locks out of the car as I'm mid-restoration)  I also tried the keys, and they work.  I have a question though, is it possible to have them re-silvered?  And if so, what kind of plating would it be?  The keys are in good shape but some of the plating has worn off through use.  I thought I would get them replated, and then try to find a key envelope to put them in and not use them, just as a Glove Box item.  Attaching a pic..
498  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 Small Journal 350 on: August 28, 2011, 02:31:18 PM
>>erikjohn,,,I can relate to your frustration.  I posted on here, I have a complete matching set of Date correct matching Robbins Seat Belts for my 67 Camaro.  I was told Robbins were never put in Camaros.  I believe there was only one owner before this car was purchased by my brother in mid 80's.   Why would anyone have changed a complete set and made sure they were date correct?
499  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: hamill seat belt on: August 28, 2011, 02:19:19 PM
Marty said,,,don't do it like I did....
500  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Research help needed, 68 front drum style, finned vs unfinned on: August 27, 2011, 01:26:27 PM
  Hello, I see you don't have a lot of 67's here, so I'll chime in.  My 11A  LOS built Coupe has the LF7 Engine and Manual Brakes, it has unfinned Drums both front and rear.
501  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Who does steering box rebuilds? on: August 27, 2011, 01:09:18 PM
  Here is a pic. of my Power Steering Services (see above post)restored pump.  Looks Great!  I don't know what the yellow dot means, but I seem to remember them being on new cars "Back in the Day".  Probably didn't last long.
502  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Early 67 Bumper Bracket to frame J-nut on: August 27, 2011, 12:40:18 PM
Can someone tell me if this is what this J-nut is supposed to look like?
    http://amkproducts.com/Catalog_PDF/56-73.pdf 
    page 60 last clip B11404  1/2 in. -13
503  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Z/28 stripes on: August 26, 2011, 10:22:56 PM
 OR, there is a stencil kit available that really makes it much easier.
504  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Who does steering box rebuilds? on: August 26, 2011, 02:44:28 PM
  I used Power Steering Services, Inc. in Springfield,Mo.-  www.powersteering.com  He has a service to restore your original.  He also has a service(which I used) to put  quicker ratio gears in your original box.  GM used the same Power Steering Gear Box casting all the way up to '92, which is why he's able to do this.
505  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Early 67 Bumper Bracket to frame J-nut on: August 20, 2011, 09:33:01 PM
>>>fyingskibiker,  yes 3481008 is correct part # in the AIM.  I'll give them a try, THANKS!
506  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Early 67 Bumper Bracket to frame J-nut on: August 20, 2011, 01:22:45 AM
  I have an early 67 with no Tie-down hole in the frame. Anybody out there know where to get the J-nuts for the rear bolt in the Front Bumper Bracket?  I've even looked at AMK.  Thanks for any help.
507  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: LOS Special Paint Cowl Tag on: August 15, 2011, 11:37:18 PM
>>>John,  Sooo, were the Dual Piston Brakes optional on anything other than SS and required on Z/28?
508  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: LOS Special Paint Cowl Tag on: August 14, 2011, 12:33:49 AM
Wouldn't the Dual Piston Brakes have only been on SS or Z/28?   Also in pics. shows front bracket for a console, just sayin' this seems to have been a nice optioned car.
509  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Engine value to 1968 Z28 owner on: July 29, 2011, 06:35:56 PM
Welcome Misse, I'm not sure if I missed something here or what.  If the Engine and these other parts were offered to you when you bought the car, and you are interested in them, why did you not purchase them then?   Is there a considerable $$$$ difference?
510  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Idler Arm for 67 on: July 13, 2011, 09:07:37 PM
   Sorry that I haven't thought to do this earlier.  I now have pics. of this Idler Arm installed, and the geometry looks perfect.  I am posting pics..  I am very happy with this Idler Arm, the little hump on top even matches the Pitman Arm.
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 46
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 18 queries.