CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 18, 2014, 12:45:27 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107455 Posts in 12500 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 49
496  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Clean again after 43 years on: December 10, 2011, 02:36:14 AM
NoYenko;
   per your first pic., I found this same stamp on my 67 V8 Coupe.  Maybe someone can confirm if the stamping was different for 6 cyl.=3, 8 cyl.=4, and 3 =Hdtp.,6 =Conv. ?   Anybody, any ideas?
497  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Recommendations for a carb restorer on: December 08, 2011, 12:54:01 AM
Where are you located?  Here's one in central U.S., Rockford, IL.   Restores a lot of Carbs. for Vettes.  I think he has 3 different levels.
                                  http://www.thequadshop.net/
498  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Ebay BBC SS/RS car LOS cowl tag on: December 03, 2011, 12:48:05 AM
KurtS;>>>>>
  OK, per my post above;
 My 11A LOS built Coupe has A 638, meaning it was built on the first day of Nov. in 66, it was the 638 th. Body started on that day.(all Models)
   I am aware that Nov.1-66 was a Tues., did the month and week date stamp reset on the 1 st. of each month?  And I also understand what you said that the A in the Body tracking # may not be on the 1 st. of the month.  But is it also quite possible that it might have been?  According to production #'s for end of each month 112746 at LOS is only 837 prior to my car.
499  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro (POSSIBLE BALDWIN MOTION 427 4 SPEED) on: December 02, 2011, 02:34:19 AM
Per IZRSSS,  that was not the usual stripe they put on a '69 Motion Camaro.  The stripe they used in '69 just went straight around the tail of the car, and a single wide stripe over the top.  Also, '69 Motion Camaros that I have seen had the Trans Am style rear spoiler.
500  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Mystery part on: December 01, 2011, 01:26:31 AM
  I just finished cleaning mine up prior to to putting them back in, imagine my surprise when I found Date Codes.  H38 on both, but kind of curious why one was stamped from the top and the other from the bottom?  Attaching a pic.
501  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: ? 69 Pace Car on EBay? on: November 27, 2011, 12:27:23 AM
 Yeah, that's what I meant, I guess it might be called something different in different circles.
502  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: ? 69 Pace Car on EBay? on: November 26, 2011, 07:43:28 PM
So, it looks to be original as claimed?   Would the J480 in the lower right corner be interplant tracking #?  J 10 th. day, 480 th. car?
503  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / ? 69 Pace Car on EBay? on: November 26, 2011, 03:18:47 PM
 This 69 Pace Car listed on EBay, what do you guys think?  It is possible?  Is it true that the LA "Pacers" didn't have the Z11 on the Cowl Tag?
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=200680006065#ht_37162wt_1131
504  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 Z28 on eBay on: November 25, 2011, 02:39:16 AM
IF it is in fact a 3892657 Block, what did they do with the Crankcase vent hole in the back of the Block?  Did they block it off?  Clearly has the vent tube to the Air cleaner coming off of the Pass. Valve Cover.  Which has already been stated are not correct for a '67.  And the PCV Valve should be in the Oil Fill Tube.  Lots of Red Flags.
505  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 camaro 1100794 alternator on: November 24, 2011, 03:03:35 AM
Oops, attaching pic. didn't work, so here's the link;
           http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=8145.0
506  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 camaro 1100794 alternator on: November 24, 2011, 02:58:27 AM
Here's a pic. from one of the other threads.   It looks to be correct, the Plug on thee back half lines up with the top adjusting bolt on the front half.
507  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Fuel tank Replacement on: November 19, 2011, 12:50:13 AM
>>>>>>KurtS;
    I'm not so sure that the stainless has that same "original" look as the steel ones do.
508  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Fuel tank Replacement on: November 18, 2011, 09:09:09 PM
  You can get the Spectra Tank in either Ni-Tern steel coated with nickel and zinc, GM32A.  Or stainless (for Fuel Injected vehicles) GM32AFI.  Price varies alot depending on supplier.
509  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Gas tank date codes on: November 18, 2011, 08:48:45 PM
Per my last pic.;
  Is that the way it was done at the factory?  It looks to be a thicker paint brushed on?  After the tank and straps were in place?
510  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Gas tank date codes on: November 16, 2011, 12:05:21 AM
>>>67-Z27;
  You are right, I went back out and dug out that Tank.  As you will see it has a bad dent in the Pass. front corner, I was trying to get out, with no luck.  I also found a small leak in the process.  So I am thinking of replacing that Tank, too bad!!!!
  It does have Black paint, just on the bottom, and it looks to have been "brushed" on.(and after the straps were in place)   I guess I had just considered it a "backyard" detail job.  Sorry!  I am attaching a pic.!
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 49
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 18 queries.