CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2015, 06:49:20 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112086 Posts in 12879 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 52
481  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 "5O" seatbelt delete car on: March 15, 2012, 11:46:50 PM
   I think you're reading this wrong.   I don't think it's read 50.  I think it's group 5, and option O (letter) or O (zero).
482  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Subframe date stamping on: March 13, 2012, 11:41:48 PM
I've never seen one of those '67 Sub-frame date stamps.  I found some stamped partial #'s  on the outside Pass. side about a foot from the back end.  I could not clearly make them out.  I do remember that part of it looked like it could be I 42, which would be close to build date of my 11A car.  Most other Date codes I've found are week 41 to week 44.
483  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Has anyone used this Trunk Spatter paint? on: March 13, 2012, 01:18:59 AM
Has anyone used this Trunk Spatter paint ?   If so, how close is it to original?
http://www.heartbeatcitycamaro.com/store/product/19388/Camaro-Trunk-spatter-paint%2C-correct-67-68-69/
484  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Please see picture of my 327 - question on originality on: March 06, 2012, 02:55:10 AM
((I thought the 1967 small block low HP. Camaro's had the Chevrolet script on the valve covers.))
(( That is correct))
 
Seeing that most pics. are of '68 and '69's, I thought I would post a pic. of my original '67  327/210 w/Powerglide  Air Cleaner/Carb./Intake and painted Script Valve covers.
485  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stud Replacement in original rear spoiler for '69? on: March 03, 2012, 01:52:33 AM
Something else you could do is get a piece of 1/4 in. threaded rod, cut it to correct length, and spot weld a 1/4 in. flat washer in the desired position.  I would spot weld it on the top side, so it wouldn't  show.  Just an idea.
486  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Package Tray Paint on: February 29, 2012, 02:35:08 PM
OK, here's my thought.  If the trim around the package tray is painted suede, and I don't believe it was, where does it change over.  Because the upper side trim is not suede, it is same as Dash face.
487  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 L-89 Convertible on ebay. on: February 22, 2012, 12:47:43 AM
  Yes, but wrong center caps.  Easy fix, otherwise gorgeous car.
488  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Anyone seen this? X33 stamp on a 67 on: February 21, 2012, 01:48:14 AM
Forgot to add, it's right in the middle.
489  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Anyone seen this? X33 stamp on a 67 on: February 21, 2012, 01:46:13 AM
  I found this stamp in the process of restoring my 67 Coupe.  It is on the Trunk edge of the Rear Window to Trunk Filler panel.   Pic. attached.
490  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 302 dipstick on: February 16, 2012, 11:45:17 PM
Were all '67 Smallblocks the same?   My original dipstick for my 327 - 210 hp. has a brown tip on it.
491  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Did 67 - 327 eng. have the lower Dipstick tube? on: February 15, 2012, 03:58:34 PM
  Well, I ordered one #3951600 from Summit Racing, got it today and it is a GM part, cool !
492  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Did 67 - 327 eng. have the lower Dipstick tube? on: February 15, 2012, 01:58:05 AM
No problem, Thanks for the response.
493  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Where is the temp sensor located? on: February 15, 2012, 01:56:45 AM
If your '67 has original Heads there won't be a provision for it in the Head.  As you stated it should be in the Intake Manifold by the Water Outlet.  To my knowledge they were never in the side of the Block.
494  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Did 67 - 327 eng. have the lower Dipstick tube? on: February 14, 2012, 02:16:59 AM
Thanks Ed,
   I found another post on here.  Plus I have done some more research, here's what I have found out.  I have the original upper tube, (which is on the outside of the block)#3876870 and I have the original Dipstick.  What I  was asking about is the lower tube "extension".  I believe the part # for that is 3951600.
495  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Did 67 - 327 eng. have the lower Dipstick tube? on: February 12, 2012, 11:53:11 PM
   Did a '67 - 327 eng. have the lower Oil Dipstick tube?   All of my Camaro resources show it only for '69.  But I have done a little checking and they show it for Corvettes and Chevelles, makes me wonder why it isn't listed for '67 Camaros?HuhHuh?
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 52
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.441 seconds with 18 queries.