CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2014, 06:32:04 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97283 Posts in 11694 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 43
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Someone is having a birthday...? :) on: February 27, 2014, 10:32:08 PM
Happy Birthday John!   Thanks for all your devotion to our cars.    Many more.
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Wiring Harness on: February 25, 2014, 01:10:21 AM
I used American Autowire for a new rear harness, very happy.  I'm sure the wires were same color as original, but age and light had discolored the originals to some extent.   The plugs and clips were right on.  The original harness pigtails had been "butchered" considerably.
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Pretty Cool Ole Car on: February 25, 2014, 12:50:54 AM
Very cool car!  Would you leave it as is?Huh
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 traction bar busings? on: February 23, 2014, 11:40:00 PM
Mike;
  Not sure what you are asking.  But yes these are solid, and they are Polyurethane.  They are Energy Suspension pieces;  ENE- 3.7115
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Were 'Pacesetter' VIN's period different? on: February 23, 2014, 05:48:59 PM
Here's a link to the Pacesetter TV Commercial;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNBpX29Qtn0
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Educate Me on: February 22, 2014, 12:02:42 AM
Looks like it could be 64 - 67 Chevelle.
http://www.opgi.com/chevelle/1964/sheet-metal-body-panels/firewall-cowl/CH28915/

37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: CRG YouTube Channel on: February 21, 2014, 11:51:05 PM
Thank you Daniel! I know that took a lot of work. Most of those slide shows would never been seen without your efforts. Smiley
[/quote)
  X2 !!!  Thank you too Chick!   Good job!
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 Metal Seatbacks on: February 14, 2014, 05:23:57 PM
Good job Darrell.  There could be a market for those.

bergy;  for anyone that might be interested in those Seat Backs,  read this thread for getting those dents out;
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=10119.msg74988#msg74988
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Chrome Plating on: February 10, 2014, 12:56:34 AM
Too bad I'm finished with my car now.  But I did find a good "Plater" in my area, that came highly recommended.  I asked several "car guys" I know that show cars and "build" cars.  I had to have my Vent Window Pillars replated as they don't repop them, and I have an "original" pair of SS/Z28 Chrome "script" Valve covers I had replated.  I am VERY pleased with both. The Pillars actually had some pitting, which they drilled out(each pit), then soldered in, then sanded smooth and buffed, before plating. And you can not tell it at all, they are VERY smooth. Like a mirror.  I went to AIH Chrome Plating in Dubuque, IA.,  it's only about an hour drive for me.  I will tell you, it doesn't come cheap for good work.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Where to find a black oil fill tube on: February 09, 2014, 01:23:03 AM
No harm Paul!  As I stated, I could not see anything that definite from the other 2 pics.
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stainless Chambered exhaust on: February 07, 2014, 10:15:38 PM
I had a gardner chambered system on my black rs/z and to me it had an unpleasant tone so I installed a gardner transverse system and I'm very happy. However on my 69 SS L34 car I replaced the original chambered with a gardner chambered system and it seems the 396 has a better tone. That reminds me I need to sell my small block gardner chambered system which has been sitting in my basement for 9 yrs.


I also had Chambered Exhaust (original)on an L34 396, except it was on a '69 Chevelle, and I too liked the sound.  But over the years I have come to realize that "Big Block" Chevy's have a deeper tone than smalblocks.  You can achieve that "deeper tone" with certain systems.  I have a PYPES 2 1/2 in. Crossflow system behind Headers on my 67 with 327, and I love it.
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Where to find a black oil fill tube on: February 07, 2014, 06:54:40 PM
I think that Intake could possibly be an L79 Intake, and for certain applications would have had that Oil Fill tube.
[/quote

Nope, it's definitely a Winters' 1967-68 Z/28 intake manifold (casting number 3917610).

Paul
Paul, I have a #3917610 on my car, and I have seen #3890490 (L79) Intakes are both Winters Foundry.  There are other differences, in other areas both are very similar in this area.  I am wondering with the quality and size of these pics. how you can be so sure?  I'm not saying your wrong, just wondering.  I don't see anything that definite.
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Where to find a black oil fill tube on: February 06, 2014, 10:39:37 PM
Is the fill tube with the return spring tab proper for a 1967?  Or di the 1967 use a smooth tube without the return spring provision?
I believe the Camaro had a smooth tube, and has been stated without the extra "step".
   Here is a link for the one pictured in reply #6;
https://www.impalaparts.com/product.php?productid=5867OFTBB
  used on '58 to '67 Full-size, and maybe some others.
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Where to find a black oil fill tube on: February 06, 2014, 10:16:32 PM
Anyone know what the correct application is for the oil fill tube pictured in reply #6.  It is on a '67/68 Z28 intake manifold and I know that is not correct.

Paul
I think that Intake could possibly be an L79 Intake, and for certain applications would have had that Oil Fill tube.
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Lifetime Warranty on 1968 Camaro on: February 06, 2014, 09:49:38 PM
Oaklyss,,,,Reply#4;  I notice that nothing is filled in on the back of that sheet, ie;  mileage/inspection dates, and is not signed.  So my guess is that this warranty is null and void.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 43
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.105 seconds with 18 queries.