CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 24, 2014, 06:14:40 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105739 Posts in 12342 Topics by 4756 Members
Latest Member: russ69
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 164
61  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Bolt for front wheel fender mouldings on: September 25, 2014, 11:29:17 PM
Aren't the bolts you are looking for the *same* bolts that hold the inner fender  to the edge of the fender's wheel opening?  ie...   no extra bolts needed?
62  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z/28 X77 garage/barn find on: September 25, 2014, 11:21:43 PM
You might want to know what lies on that sticker before you start cleaning off the paint..   Below is a link from a year or so ago, where we collected information from a number of Camaros on this board and tabulated the data..

Gary W.
63  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: JL8 / J56 4-wheel disc racing brakes on: September 25, 2014, 12:16:42 AM

I'm not familiar with 'X' on brake calipers, but occasionally we see heads (particularly Corvette heads from the fifties/sixties), that have a big X on them; what I've heard speculated is that those are early castings....  maybe a first run to check out the molds??   I'd be interested to hear yours and JohnZ's input on that...
64  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: PRE-1969 SCCA SEDAN CATEGORY RECOGNITION FORMS for the Pontiac Firebird on: September 23, 2014, 10:35:17 PM
Not Camaro, but speaks to Titus Trans Am cars...    
Attached photo is of the intake/carbs supposedly from one of the Mustangs used by Titus during his '67 championship winning season.. alongside a weber setup which ran at Lemans...  (Photo made from the Dan Case collection of Ford parts).. Smiley
65  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Hours of body part install on: September 23, 2014, 10:22:51 PM
I'd prefer that one to a 'repro body', I think.. based on the description of no rust... no significant damage.   Kerr would have all the other parts to finish it... with body work, paint, and interior... Smiley

66  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 RS Z28 - opinions please on: September 22, 2014, 10:25:50 PM
I saw the pic of the car. I'd guess Fathom Blue, but I've been wrong on shades of blue before.

It's the strangest stamp I've seen, but I think it's real. Never seen one like that.

Is the VIN stamp in a viable location for a gang holder stamp?
67  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z/28 X77 garage/barn find on: September 22, 2014, 10:22:39 PM
Yes, it is.. and it appears to be correct and original.
68  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Amazing 69 Z/28 Survivor on: September 22, 2014, 12:02:14 PM
I believe we've collected sufficient information from enough shifter bodies/cars to know that there is a date coded into the manufacturer's number; not an explicit 'date only code', but the date of manufacture (month and year) is coded into the number on the shifter body. 
69  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Fuel Pump Backing Plate on: September 21, 2014, 11:21:42 PM
when I rebuilt my engine in 1976, it was black...  I don't think the engine had ever been apart at that point, but I can't recall if the pump itself was original or not..  as I was  more concerned with the pumping than the numbers to check at that point... Smiley
70  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Pad stamp check on: September 19, 2014, 03:29:10 PM
...  ground off..... 
71  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: What's the correct Alternator bracket for a 69 Z/28 on: September 19, 2014, 08:09:01 AM
You just beat me to the punch on the pulley spacer rszmjt  Yes the top bracket in my first pic is the correct one.  Len (6667ss138) had pointed out to me about a spacer that's pressed into his bracket in the most central hole of his bracket (which mine is missing).  Is that for the smog pump attachment ?


Yes The upper smog pump bolt goes through the spacer into the pump.

Can you (or someone) with an car with smog, that's been there since the factory, take a photograph of the bracket and spacer? and the assembly as on the engine for those of us attempting to add smog back to our engines...  Thanks..
72  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: FOUND: The Actual 1969 Camaro RS/SS Conv. NASCAR Pace Car for Bristol in 1969! on: September 18, 2014, 10:18:11 PM
He also wants to know if anyone can help him acquire a pretty rare option that originally came with his car.  He states that he has, "been trying to locate the fiber optic wire for the front turn lights to the fenders, no one in the after market offers that item.  Do you know of any outfit that might have that item!!! please let me know."

There is nothing to the fiber optic 'system' except for the indicators and the fiber optic itself (a coated glass fiber light conveyer)..  If he only needs the fiber optic line itself (if his is missing or broken in half), then a corvette supplier would be the best source, as all Corvettes built in several years between '68-9 and 1971 Corvettes had them.  Many people think they are more complicated than they are.     A response to a similar question on the Corvette Forum addressed this issue very well, which I will repeat here:
"There is nothing mechanical or electrical about fiber optics. They are very simple. Just fiber strands that transmit light very easily, from the light source to the individual lenses in the console. The purpose of these items was to show the driver if there was an external light bulb that was not functioning.

 Here are a few of the common reasons why a fiber optic does not work. Check to see if the bulb is burnt out. If the lights were removed to have the car repainted, it is not uncommon for the fiber optic end to get painted over and not allow light to travel to the console. The fiber cable could be broken as a result of a previous accident. Check inside the console to see if the fiber optic cable is connected to the console lenses. When I first got my car, I found some of the cables just not connected to the console lense.

 Anyway, this is very basic technology and it is not like trying to run down an electrical problem. As was previously stated, if you have a problem it is pretty easy to just re-run new fiber cable and re-tape it into the harness. IMO. "

ie.. to have them work, the fiber optic line must 1) be present, 2) be clean on the ends, and 3) be installed in the fittings of the console and lamp source.
73  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Original Horns #289 & 290 with odd dates or not ? on: September 17, 2014, 06:26:15 PM
Your discussion and photos of the horns got me off my butt to go look at mine.. Smiley   I removed them a couple of years ago, when disassembling the front clip for clean up, and didn't *see* any numbers, although they appeared to be original...  so down to the basement I went, finally found the right box..  dug out the horns and with a little cleaning, identified mine as #289 (date 9H3), and #290 (date 9H3).   I think that date would be 3 August 69 ;  my car is an O9C (18Sep69)...   I got photos also which be added to my already large photo file.. Smiley

Gary W
74  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Hours of body part install on: September 17, 2014, 05:48:55 PM
$11,500 for a complete body shell from Real Deal Steal.. doesn't sound like too bad a deal... all new metal..  ready for Kerr's parts removed from the rust bucket.... If a decent original body shell cannot be found... (which I agree would be the best alternative for him)...
75  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Hours of body part install on: September 17, 2014, 07:36:50 AM
I think those hour estimates are way too low, based on what I see; in 1967, a 'panel replacement' was based on collision damage, not rust.   Removing, preparing the adjoining surfaces, etc when rust (esp heavy rust as Kerr's car) is very time consuming comparied to simply cutting off a damaged panel and replacing with straight metal.   Any good shop will provide their costs/invoices showing hours; surely someone here who has had rusty panels replaced can provide some 'real world' hourly estimates.   Another good thing to do would be to *ask the fella providing the $/hr estimate, for his 'hours estimate'.   If he can't provide at least a rough estimate of the time, it indicates to me that he's never done this same type of job before.

Kerr:  175 hrs is a bit over 4 man weeks; or 2 guys for 2 weeks.  Do you think all your rusty panels could be removed and adjacent panels derusted and preserved, new panels adjusted, welded in and prepared for paint in 2 weeks by 2 guys?   I really don't think so based on what I see get accomplished in such shops.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 164
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 18 queries.