CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 01, 2014, 07:22:17 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105008 Posts in 12267 Topics by 4728 Members
Latest Member: MartySS
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 152 153 [154] 155 156 ... 161
2296  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Need a little P&A help please... on: April 24, 2009, 10:59:05 PM
Bert,

My P&A is 30M, dated Sept 1970.
I've replied to your additional questions in PM.

Thanks Kevin and Gary. Can you guys tell me what P&A number your books are?

Ed

2297  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 69 302 engine bearings . What kind? on: April 24, 2009, 12:16:44 AM
I used CL77 in my 302 when I rebuilt it (late 70's); my shop was out of the non-grooved, so I installed grooved mains, although my IMSA-GT racer/engineer/*expert* told me at the time that he preferred the non-grooved.
2298  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Need a little P&A help please... on: April 23, 2009, 04:41:33 PM
I have a Sept '70 Parts and Accessories Manual....  What do you need?
2299  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: ORIGINAL KEY'S : can anyone tell me if my key's are original ? on: April 14, 2009, 04:47:21 PM
.. and it appears they still have the punchouts...  Smiley     

PS.  I found an original ignition key for my '69 (with the punchout intact) UNDER the original carpet when I replaced the carpet a fewe years ago....  I was surprised to find a key there but very happy to find it fit the ignition...  Smiley
2300  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: whats with this protect-o-plate ? on: April 14, 2009, 04:44:29 PM
Those dymo labels were done by the dealerships; I've seen several different colors used....  (How many  different dealerships were there?)   Smiley
2301  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: differentials on: April 14, 2009, 04:28:03 PM
William? Are you of the opinion that Penske and other Trans Am teams did not run posi rears on their cars on the Trans Am  and IMSA-GT series???    That would be the opposite of my understanding if true.....  and they Were running road courses!   In fact, the Service Duty 4-sheel disk brake rears came with HD posi units with heavier springs, more plates and 4-5 times the breakaway load as the standard posi units!
2302  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need clarification on original ZL/2 firewall relay on: April 02, 2009, 12:22:01 PM
My car has the original one on it...  I'd be glad to take a photo for you if you like?  Let me know and I'll post it here..
2303  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Stupid ??? How do you change the oil in a Muncie? on: April 01, 2009, 04:27:55 PM
*L*..  guys used to mix in a little STP oil treatment to slick up their shifts (in the south), but..  never heard the Aunt Jemima trick.....   an advantage would be in cleaning the lube off your hands..     just LICK it off. .   Smiley
2304  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 front RS turn signal lens trim on: April 01, 2009, 04:15:02 PM
My 09C ('69) Z28/RS does not have stainless trim around the front parking lights, and hasn't since I purchased it in '77 or thereabouts;  My lower valence was replaced though, prior to my purchase (it still had the GM sticker on the back) so the parking lights could also have been replaced Huh
2305  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: New Valve Springs for '69 302...? on: April 01, 2009, 03:53:46 PM
Jerry, You indicated 0.040" head gaskets; so you are using the laminated head gasket versus the steel shim?  Are you doing this to reduce compression, or for some other reason?
2306  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Dual Exhausted? on: April 01, 2009, 03:50:13 PM
You can apparently edit it up to the point that someone replies; after that, it's DONE...   *G*
2307  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Proper Designation SS/RS RS/SS? on: April 01, 2009, 03:47:55 PM
I've always listed the most important option first...  ie..   Z28 or SS is MORE important (to me and to most) than the fact that it has the RS option....
2308  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: New Valve Springs for '69 302...? on: March 28, 2009, 10:18:02 AM
I decided to go with the 'Z28 spring kit'..  as they appeared to be as original....
2309  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: correct steering column bowl on: March 26, 2009, 03:46:22 PM
If you are concerned over the 90 deg difference in orientation of the 'lock' indicator; I was too.   The tilt column I have I've had for 30 yrs; I believe it is a '69 Camaro tilt.   All other characteristics and indicators are the same as my non-tilt original column (except for the orieintation of the lock symbol).

Please post whatever you find out as I'm interested as well...  I want to restore and install the tilt column in my car .... for additional 'gut' space...  *G*
2310  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Ignition coil numbers on: March 24, 2009, 01:20:58 PM
Wlw...   that is very interesting...   and implies that the coil manufacturer also mfg'ed the bracket?  (or had it made by a vendor to GM specs to sell to chevy with the coil).... ?

I removed my original coil/bracket in the '70 when I installed the Mallory Rev Pol with Judson Electronic magneto.... I'm sure it's in the garage 'somewhere'....   *Smiley ..but finding it might be a whole different story!
Does anyone have PN and/or a photo of the correct coil/bracket for the '69 Z28 so at least I know what to scrounge in my garage/shop for?  Smiley
Pages: 1 ... 152 153 [154] 155 156 ... 161
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.222 seconds with 18 queries.