CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 24, 2014, 07:03:05 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105717 Posts in 12341 Topics by 4754 Members
Latest Member: Jake
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 102 103 [104] 105 106 ... 164
1546  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / *early* '68 Z28 4053 carb date code on: May 04, 2013, 10:44:37 AM
There is a 4053 carb on ebay right now, with a date code of '705'.       The seller says it represents a date of 5th week of October 1967. 
Is that accurate?    How were Nov 67 carbs dated? and Dec?   
Was there a change in the month part of the code designation somewhere along the line between '67 and '69?   
1547  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Installing grab handle and bezels on: May 03, 2013, 11:10:54 PM
I managed to remove my original glove box without damaging it.... what's the issue?
1548  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: blower motor on a 68 factory air car? on: May 03, 2013, 11:09:46 PM
i would suggest the preferred method is to remove or at least loosen the RH fender. ..  Smiley
1549  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: JL8 vs HD service package 4-wheel disc 12-bolt rear axle on: May 03, 2013, 11:08:01 PM
Thanks Jon!

Does anyone know of or have any documentation re the number of plates and spring pressure differences in teh posi units between the two rears?   Bob Christianson told me the differences.. and I made notes.  but can't find my notes..   From my memory, there is a significant difference in the number of plates and the Service Package rear posi has much higher spring pressures...
1550  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Heavy duty GM 12-bolt axles on: May 03, 2013, 11:04:52 PM
Thanks Jon!

1551  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 0 rocker arms BIG or small 0 ? differences? on: May 03, 2013, 11:28:19 AM
I've had 030 over 302's.. that would wind above 10,000 rpm with stock components... including stock rockers... Smiley
1552  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Heavy duty GM 12-bolt axles on: May 03, 2013, 07:40:47 AM
Thanks Robert.
Your memory is the same as mine!  Smiley     I also have a copy of the 'Chevrolet Special Equipment' book - that I was referring to - I copied from the green sheets a friend of mine loaned me in the '70's (Robert Christianson, who also ran a '69  in Trans-Am and later and later a 73 Camaro in IMSA-GT).   My knowledge of the 'service duty' rear mostly goes to information I got from him, and later I purchased one of the rears that was used in his '69 Z28 TA car.
The reason I asked you those questions is because you are knowledgeable, and I was hoping that you could clear up some of the misinformation that is out there.   The 'few lines' in the available books dedicated to the service package rear do not do justice to the differences in that rear end, and seems to be mostly 'speculation' dreamed up by the authors...

Thanks for your informative response to my questions, and I for one would love to know more about the differences between JL8 and Service Package rears.
PS.  I also do not believe one could order a new Camaro for the street and have the factory install a service package rear end, although it's certainly possible (for a few months) to order the JL8 rear and then pay the almost $1000 for the service package (OTC) and pay the dealer to install it..  although that scenario certainly makes no sense!  As I understand it, the service package rears were difficult to get and likely required someone 'close to Chevrolet' to get one promptly for a TA car.  Bob told me he had a relationship with Vince Piggins when he was running that assisted him in getting some of the special parts.
1553  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 0 rocker arms BIG or small 0 ? differences? on: May 02, 2013, 12:43:45 PM
Just out of curiosity, I have heard it's best to keep the same pivot ball to the same rocker. Are there any exceptions or is it a must to get new pivots? Mine are all mixed up in a box, all look fine with no blueing, cracks, galling or score marks. I'm using roller tip stamped steel 1.5's at the moment and probably will continue using them when I finally pull the 350 and install the 302, but what if I did go back to the 'O' rockers?
It's very easy to run the balls/rockers on a wire or string as you take them off an engine... you can even clean them that way  and they will come off in the correct order as well.. Smiley     I would suggest using a little molybdenum disulfide on the metal/metal wear surfaces on installation; especially with the mismatched ones..  it should help the two rubbing parts develop an 'affinity' for one another pretty quickly.. Smiley
I also keep lifters in order, when the come off a cam I'm going to reuse; just put them in a small box ordered in the correct fashion, and label the box for front and L/R side..  *(and moly works great on lifter/cam wear surfaces as well during breakin..)
1554  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 69 Z 19N687352 Original Block on: May 02, 2013, 12:22:44 PM
I noticed the same thing..  2 months+ after casting before assembly??  when the norm is probably a couple of days?
1555  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Muncie ID ? on: May 02, 2013, 12:04:14 PM
Thanks Ed,

I cleaned it and opened the side cover; it is apparently an M20 (from the 2 grooves) although I didn't spin it and count turns.  It is NOT an M22.   
I've never ran the transmission, although I've had it since 1971; installed it briefly in a Henry J, but it was only ran once around a short block.   I let a friend use it for a few months back in the late '70's in his 55 Chevy.   All the numbers from the parts seem consistent with '68-'69 Muncie production, although I know I did swap the front case after I purchased it...  so we know the front case came from a April or May '68 Chevelle (Kansas City plant).   All visible characteristics of the trans are consistent with '68-69 Muncie M20/M21.
The ears and gears look good, and there is no damage, existing or repaired, to the transmission cases. The Chevelle VIN is stamped on the top of the transmission.  I need Camaro $$ more than I need this trans.  Do you have any idea what it's value would be?   
1556  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Heavy duty GM 12-bolt axles on: May 02, 2013, 07:06:25 AM
Hi Robert,
I'm curious why you refer to the 'service duty' axle as 'JL8'?   Do you call it that because that's how a lot of Camaro people today refer to ALL Camaro disk brake rears?    

JL8 is the order/option code for the factory installed rear, but the 'over the counter' piece, I've only ever heard referred to as 'The Service Duty' rear end.
In my mind, only the factory installed rear is truly a 'JL8'.  The Service Duty rear served the same purpose (rear disk brakes) for Trans Am racers, but in a much heavier duty way!   Chevrolet never referred to it as 'JL8' did they?

It would add clarification if we had more distinctive terminology to distinguish the two?  There were other differences between the two rears than just the bearing size and axle diameters.   The posi unit in the Service Duty rear had more plates and heavier duty springs also, and there are probably other differences I don't know of as well.

Does anyone have written documentation for, or know the PN, that the Service Duty rear end (brake to brake) was sold as??  I can't find my copy of the 'original' Power Book; does that identify the rear by part number? or by ??
1557  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z28 Carb accel linkage and vacuum hardline? on: May 01, 2013, 08:29:27 AM
Can't you just bend it where you want it to be?
1558  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z28 Carb accel linkage and vacuum hardline? on: May 01, 2013, 07:51:09 AM
Zman,
I'm not sure on how such tubes are measured (ID or OD?).. it's a small tube.
From the photograph I sent, it appears the OD is ~ 3/16" (definitely less than 1/4)..
1559  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Was the nose bolted together when the stripe applied? on: April 29, 2013, 09:44:08 PM
If you compare your Camaro to a model A....  the camaro will look great.. Smiley
1560  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 69 302 motor sitting to long on: April 29, 2013, 02:03:28 PM
I agree with JohnZ...   but besides oil, also make sure you have cooling  and gauges hooked up and working so yuo can monitor engine performance while driving it.. S**
Pages: 1 ... 102 103 [104] 105 106 ... 164
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.118 seconds with 19 queries.