CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 04:37:05 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103780 Posts in 12188 Topics by 4700 Members
Latest Member: lpetruc
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 83 84 [85] 86 87 ... 156
1261  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: trunk latch on 69 z on: August 21, 2013, 12:02:42 PM
Scott,

Attached are a couple of photos showing my original never restored trunk latch...  I hope this helps.  I think you can see that the latch got some overspray from the body paint, and was incompletely painted by the trunk splatter.  Based on looking at lots of similar areas on many original chevys over the years, I would also suspect there were variations from car to car, since it basically was an 'overspray / transition' area of the car.

Gary
1262  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 327 motor restart on: August 20, 2013, 01:55:40 PM
I know of no reason to suspect the 'oil pump' might fail.   

Have you ever seen the insides of a chevy oil pump?  they are very simple.   If it has oil in it, it's self lubricating, and if it has good pressure, then it's working as it should.   About the only issues I've ever heard of with a factory small block chevy oil pump, is the pickup coming out of the pump, and the probability of that in a street car has to be infinitesimal...

Run it til the oil is hot and well circulated, then drain the old oil (check for foaming or water?).. then fill with new oil.... make sure you have enough, but not too much.. Smiley
1263  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 2013 Monterey motorsports reunion: Who's going? on: August 19, 2013, 03:43:01 PM
The yellow '69 Z28 in the first photo below once belonged, or still belongs, to Rick Sterbins?  (I see Sterbins automotive on the fender...)...  Attached is a photo from the Supercars.net, showing the same car in the 2010 Monterey Reunion.   

http://www.supercars.net/gallery/119513/2484/952175.jpg

I'm almost positive Richard is the same 'Rick Sterbins' I knew from the USAF at Keesler AFB, around the '69-70 time frame.    Rick had raced a '66 Mustang notchback (one of a small handful of Shelby-ized race notchbacks) in Europe and all over, but returned from Europe, sold the Mustang to a friend of mine (Mike Seus) who converted it to the street.  Rick then bought a yellow '69 Z28... Smiley    I'm guessing this is the same Z28 he bought back then?
1264  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct starter for '67 - 327 on: August 19, 2013, 03:32:48 PM
Does anyone KNOW WHY  different PN's were used?   

First gen Z28s, which were the highest compression small block engines, all had manual transmissions.  The 'books' say that PN 1108367 is correct for the Z28, and for all manual trans small blocks.   Do automatic trans cars requires a different starter?   Is this typical that auto cars and manual cars get different starters?   Is the difference the torque required, OR the teeth on the starter drive gear?  or ??     What's the difference and the reason for it? 
1265  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / which Headlamp retainer is correct for 69 RS ? on: August 19, 2013, 03:25:05 PM
When I disassembled my front clip and all the RS parts, I noticed the car had two different size (depth) Headlamp retainer rings.   These appear to be identical except for the depth, and both/either work fine.    One is approx. 13/16" deep, and the other is 1" deep.   Which of these are correct?   or did GM use both sizes interchangeably?   One corner of my car was hit before I bought it in the mid 70's, so I'm not sure if both these parts are original from the factory, OR not.  Your help greatly appreciated so I know which of these to replace.. Smiley   Photos are attached...
1266  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust on: August 16, 2013, 08:52:12 PM
Ed, others,

Thanks for the information on the Z28 exhaust (head) pipe diameter... and that 9May letter would seem to put the question on NC8 to rest (on Camaros), as it stated the *effective date* for discontinuation of the option is May19.   To me, that says unless your car was produced on 18May or earlier, it has zero chance of having come from the factory with NC8...
1267  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust (Another Exhaust question) on: August 15, 2013, 03:53:41 PM
For late '69 Camaros, after discontinuation of the NC8 (chambered), and after the introduction of the resonators to the standard transverse muffler system, What was the diameter of the exhaust (head) pipe off of the manifolds??    People who sale these, list both 2" and 2-1/4" diameter.  Which is correct, and acceptable in the judged original classes?
1268  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: I found a Sequoia Green Z28 with air plenum 9 k miles ! on: August 13, 2013, 02:27:44 PM
My 69 RS Z came with no guages. My 69 L78 had none either not even a tach.
I assume your 69 L78 was an early car, did they eventually make the tach mandatory on the L78 cars, like they did on the Z?

Just for sakes of accurate terminology, the tach was not *mandatory* on the Z28, but it did become *standard* equipment later in the '69 year.  The only *Mandatory* options for the Z28 were the disk brakes and the 4 speed manual transmission! .. Smiley
1269  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: I found a Sequoia Green Z28 with air plenum 9 k miles ! on: August 13, 2013, 08:52:55 AM
Continuing with the discussion about factory gauges in race cars:
While I did not race my Camaro on a track, I did (as most Z-owners did) participate in some competition on the street.. Smiley
Attached below is how I addressed the 'sloppy tach' issue in my 69 Z28 in the 70's when I was driving it regularly.  I removed the original tach and the plastic housing around it (and saved it for installation later - which is now.. Smiley...  then I bought an extra plastic cover and cut out the 'clear face portion', because it interfered with the larger Sun Supertach.  I then installed the Sun Supertach in the same location as the factory tach came from the factory, and installed the modified plastic cover.   Photo attached.   This approach worked for me, because in the late 70's, I didn't want to make any 'non-recoverable' modification to my very original Z28.
Note:  I did 'trust' the mechanical oil pressure gauge which came in the console gauge cluster, so I did no other mods to my car (other than a Mallory Rev Pol and Judson electronic magneto, and some internal engine parts.. Forgedtrue pistons, lunati blueprinted cam, etc  and it would rev well beyond the 6500 rpm that I *tried* to observe.. most of the time...  Smiley
1270  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct 69 Z/28 Coil Springs on: August 11, 2013, 09:34:34 PM
I'd like to see the height on one which sat unsprung for the last 40 years vs sitting with the suspension compressed.
measure your rocker height and compare to Chevrolet's spec (from the AIM), and let us know...?
1271  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct 69 Z/28 Coil Springs on: August 10, 2013, 11:22:58 PM
take a photo on the same plane as the top of the front tire, or do some measurements from the top of the tire to the top lip of the fender.  Yours looks closer to 'factory' Z28 than James, but the perspective of your photo makes that hard to see.
1272  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: August 10, 2013, 04:21:57 PM
Windshield Wiper Motor PNs and markings including dates.
build date  NOR/LOS    RS?    sticker PN?    Stamped PN?  Sticker codes       Notes


   12B         LOS           Y        No Sticker     5045605        No sticker      stamped on the side - 4918976  2)
   03D         NOR          Y        5045605            Y             079  9  B  F     Part # in yellow paint
   06A         NOR          N         5045572           Y            100  9  5  B
   06A         NOR          N        5045572            N            134  9  6  B
   09C         NOR          Y        5045605            N             227  9  6  A
    ??              ?           N        5045572            N             282  9  6  B
1273  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: August 10, 2013, 01:45:53 PM
Copo, I've plugged in your data for you.   You didn't say if it was an RS, but I assume NOT?  and no stamped PN?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

build date  NOR/LOS    RS?    sticker PN?    Stamped PN?  Sticker codes       Notes
   03D         NOR          Y        5045605            Y             079  9  B  F     Part # in yellow paint
   06A         NOR                    5045572                           100  9  5  B
   06A         NOR          N        5045572            N            134  9  6  B
   09C         NOR          Y        5045605            N             227  9  6  A
    ??                           N        5045572            N            282  9  6  B
1274  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct 69 Z/28 Coil Springs on: August 10, 2013, 09:12:45 AM
It would be very interesting, if you measured the distance from the bottom of the rocker, both sides, at front of rocker and back of rocker.   That would give us a good comparison to 'spec'... ?  make sure you're on a good level surface to get the best measures with the tires properly inflated.
1275  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Correct 69 Z/28 Coil Springs on: August 09, 2013, 10:31:18 PM
to me, it looks between and inch and 2 inches high in front.   I expect to see the top of the fender be approx. even with the top of the tire in front sitting on level ground (for Z28s)..
Pages: 1 ... 83 84 [85] 86 87 ... 156
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.372 seconds with 19 queries.