CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 24, 2015, 10:50:08 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109050 Posts in 12623 Topics by 4859 Members
Latest Member: Tyoung4th
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 59
766  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Cowl color on '67 Camaro on: November 07, 2008, 11:56:55 AM
http://www.camaros.org/exterior.shtml
767  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 standard grill color on: November 06, 2008, 05:26:21 AM
  SEM #39143 (best), Krylon 1613 (has been changed to 51613 [sheen difference] ), or Fusion paint. Use of adhesion promotor or tie-coat is not necessary if already painted. if you have a spray gun -- PPG 9266 or SEM in quarts. If just the grill -- aerosol for convenience and you can use for interior components as well.
  It would be best to paint bezels as well to maintain sheen consistency throughout grill components.
 
768  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Radiator Paint Chipping Off on: November 03, 2008, 04:05:25 PM
A.) yes B.) no
769  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Radiator Paint Chipping Off on: November 03, 2008, 12:49:34 PM
If it was a repo radiator the paint and processs they use is not always best. I got lucky with SOME of them. It's best to DP-90 the bare radiator and then paint. Whatever the case, the removal of the existing failing finish is necessary followed by proper painting procedures. I've yet to have one fail.
770  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 67-8 filler neck shield on: November 03, 2008, 12:35:15 PM
What significance do the #'s stamped on the shield have? They are as follows and one is not entirely easy to read and the other can be inverted to read two ways:  1.)  N25?
                                                                                        2.)  6H or H9
771  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: breather hose filter on: November 02, 2008, 05:29:38 PM
Interesting. Have to wait for more knowledge to be posted. Thank you Charley.
772  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: breather hose filter on: November 02, 2008, 04:17:10 PM
Would the one I posted be an OTC replacement?  Charley, do yours have a GM part# on them? My arrestor has only the info above. If indeed it is for a crossram set up or unusual substitution as John indicates, mine would not be technically correct because it has no GM part # on it, no? If yours in fact do.
773  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: breather hose filter on: November 02, 2008, 12:06:32 PM
Would this be the adapter of which you speak? There is no part# embossing.
774  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 ralley wheel paint on: November 01, 2008, 09:58:53 PM
 I only have one code for Argent in my files. Secretary copied all GM codes years ago. Info.  was copied from pages such as the link below.
 The code # would remain the same. Argent being Argent. No flattening agent equals more gloss. Your shop can pull this up on their computer mixing system database. We had microfiche Gary... old school.
           
http://www.tcpglobal.com/aclchip.aspx?image=1969-chevrolet-pg01.jpg
775  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 ralley wheel paint on: November 01, 2008, 08:51:19 PM
Argent silver -- PPG code: DQE 8568
776  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Royal Plum..?? on: November 01, 2008, 05:54:12 PM
No, it's not origionally MM. I built what I wanted. I've had this since '83. Took years to decide on a color. Complimented on color often. "Different" they say.  Doing an origional '68 Code 00 now. Not 50K cars but they work for me. And I drive them...often.
I don't post pics often so this may not show the size I want. We'll see.
777  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: breather hose filter on: November 01, 2008, 10:13:32 AM
Part I have was manufactured by Fisher Corp.,  PAT. #3287094 ( Patent not Part) Would it's use be incorrect without RPO to substantiate?
778  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Interior roof liner on a '67...installation? on: November 01, 2008, 07:10:02 AM
   It's easier to do than to explain in two sentences. If you are frustrated before you have begun as stated then you may have set yourself up for more of the same. It's really not difficult. It requires patience. I'm not sure why you cannot take advantage of your rotisserie but it doesn't matter. I'll touch on a few points, the headliner will "teach" you the rest. Get many vice grip clamps. Put screws in to locate any hardware mounting locations after install. Lay it out prior to installation to acclimate and flatten. Apply adhesive to both car and liner and let sit(obvious?). Pull the front and back taught at middle. Work in increments outward. Applying cement as you go at times. You'll have to slice the bow sleeves back. You simply have to work the perimeter slowly re-adjusting as you go. The part that requires patience and more working is the tack strip where the sail panel is. Sometimes pulling it taught there and using widemouth clamps helps. Install trim moldings an voila! Believe it or not any small wrinkles will dissipate. Contact cement is cooperative. You can re-adjust required areas. The moldings can be pulled off in places and the liner pulled tighter as needed. Then just push them back on. 
   You will get a multitude of on-line techniques. Patience and self observation are the key elements.
   
779  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Gratitude on: October 31, 2008, 06:15:20 PM
    This is to extend a large measure of gratitude to John Z. I have read his data and papers written on the subject of timing and vacuum advance. With his consultation, his VA Can recommendations and tuning parameters, I have greatly improve performance.
    I post this on open forum not for the regulars who are aware of John's knowledge, but for those who are new and to value his advice. Acquisition of his knowledge in past posts and in the future is an understated asset.
    Thanks again John. Today's ride with the update was exhilarating.
                                                                                               Scott
780  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: breather hose filter on: October 31, 2008, 11:41:47 AM
 Connection OD is 11/16. It's in Rick's cat. page 254.
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 59
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.277 seconds with 18 queries.