CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 28, 2015, 03:53:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
110358 Posts in 12747 Topics by 4885 Members
Latest Member: NorCam
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 [41] 42 43 ... 57
601  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Fan Shroud Bolt on: November 30, 2009, 07:15:41 PM
Here's the original fan shroud bolt.

John what headmarking does that bolt have?

Thanks,
602  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: What is the correct finish on these fasteners please? on: November 29, 2009, 10:07:13 PM
Mine has never been touched, and all of those bezel/cluster/heater control screws are black phosphate.

Mine are the same as John's.
603  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: 302 bellhousing and starter not fitting?? on: November 15, 2009, 09:06:11 AM
I agree with Stingr69. I just recently sold a 621 for $250. You can buy good 403's for $100.
If you are rebuilding the 302, I would do it right regarding the B/H and starter.

Good Luck,
604  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Paint Advice Needed on: November 11, 2009, 07:40:40 PM
I have used and have read about many people using DP-90 on the subframe. I used a black lacquer sash paint on my inner fenders, DP-90 on my firewall (I think) DP 90 on the underside (I did overspray my car), My springs are gray steel color, I have read that the springs were either black or natural gray steel color. Mine were originally not painted so I went back that way. Front suspension is not painted, natural color steel. McNeish's book has a really good section in the back of his book that gives you the percentage of gloss used on various parts off the car.

Lawrence
605  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: galvinized floor plug restoration original dated pieces on: November 11, 2009, 07:28:35 PM
Pic in reply #11. You know what they are.  http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=2438.0
Pic in reply #11. You know what they are.  http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=2438.0

OHHHH ok thanks
606  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: galvinized floor plug restoration original dated pieces on: November 09, 2009, 08:46:04 PM
where are these plugs you are talking about?
607  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: NOS Rally Caps on: November 02, 2009, 10:48:35 PM
5800 is probably the assembly of the 5802 and 5805 cap and ornament; Norris was the original supplier.

Thanks John.

The caps actually look a little dull. I dont know if I should polish them or just leave them alone. What is correct for NCRS?
608  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: NOS Rally Caps on: November 01, 2009, 09:37:16 PM
Second pic
609  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / NOS Rally Caps on: November 01, 2009, 09:35:52 PM
I bought a set of NOS Rally Caps and the gentleman that sent them to me sent what looks like the original box. Not that big of a deal but kinda of cool to see that these caps have been sitting in what looks like an original box. JohnZ can probaly confirm this.

Pic 1
610  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Door certification decal on: October 21, 2009, 06:17:08 PM
If you are talking about the decal that showed the VIN and date the car was complete then yes, 69 DID have it later in the production run. I dont know exactly when they started but I think it was after 04C.
611  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Rear seat Divider on: October 19, 2009, 08:45:15 PM
Are you talking about the cardboard piece that hangs behind the rear seat? If so yes standard interior gets one.
612  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Low Fuel light fixed on: October 19, 2009, 05:47:08 AM
It looks like a bulb, not a fuse but acts like a fuse.
613  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Coorect engine block for 1969 SS350 on: October 17, 2009, 09:42:56 PM
Steve -

I disagree, if your car was built at Norwood, it's possible to make your engine pad "numbers matching" if you do your homework, take your time and find a donor block from another Camaro...





Steve,

LA built cars did have the VIN on the PAD longer in the model year than Norwood cars and they moved them to the oil filter area and then abck to the pad. I dont know the dates that this happened. Your car may would have had the vin on the pad.

I guess where I'm missing it is aren't the sequential numbers part of what is stamped? Therefore, the engine pad would have the partial VIN matching the VIN tag on the dash??? If it makes any difference, my car was built in L.A.

Steve
614  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Low Fuel light fixed on: October 17, 2009, 09:09:10 PM
As it turned out, the only problem I had was the low fuel module bulb. I did not know that the bulb in the socket served any purpose for the low fuel module.

With the ignition switch on and the Low Fuel light on, I pulled the bulb out of the socket and the ligt went out. I put the bulb back in the socket and the light came on. The bulb does not illuminate, but acts like a connection, I guess.

Can someone explain why GM used a bulb in this module? Or is this just look like a bulb and is not or what?

615  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: loosening the power steering pump on: October 17, 2009, 08:43:53 PM
If you dont have one you may want to buy yourself a Chasis Service Manual and also a Assembly Instruction Manual. Not trying to be a smart a. These manuals are a great help.

Have fun!
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 [41] 42 43 ... 57
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 18 queries.