CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 27, 2015, 10:42:32 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
111308 Posts in 12818 Topics by 4913 Members
Latest Member: devodave
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 38
466  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 AIM 6 B2 on: April 28, 2010, 10:05:07 PM
Found what I needed in 67 Corvette AIM.
Bob
467  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Oil Filter on: April 28, 2010, 09:05:20 PM
68 AIM  6 B2 shows #6437955. The 67 AIM I have does not show 6 B2. Try someone with a 67 parts book to (maybe) get the correct part number.
Bob
468  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 67 AIM 6 B2 on: April 28, 2010, 08:35:09 PM
Anyone have a 67 AIM with UPC 6 B2? The one I have is blank.
Bob
469  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Production line question?????? Pulley installation on: January 14, 2010, 09:12:42 PM
Where the alternators coded so that they would find there way to the correct engine assembly? How did the correct p/s pulleys get installed on the pump & engine assembly?
Bob
470  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 headlight switch w /U17 console instruments on: January 11, 2010, 11:24:10 PM
Anyone with a 67 parts book?
471  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Production line question?????? Pulley installation on: January 11, 2010, 11:13:23 PM
When the alternators and power steering pumps arrived at the engine dress line, did they have the pulleys already installed?
Bob Grin
472  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 black altenator fan on: January 11, 2010, 10:47:38 PM
Thanks for the picture. your fan and the one in Jerry M's book look to be the same . The one in Jerry's book is for a 67 Z28 but I think they would probably be the same as the 67 L78.
Now I need to find one...
Bob
Here is a 67 L78 fan
473  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Aluminum on: January 02, 2010, 05:43:12 PM
Charley,
How well does that configuration work? I would think that there are some draw backs?
Bob
Just use a stock L78 intake. It will even work with oval port heads if you pay attention to the gasket and will look like it belongs.
474  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 black altenator fan on: December 31, 2009, 11:17:07 PM
To all,
Anyone have a picture of an original 67 BB L78 black alt. fan?
There seems to be alot of different black fans available but they do not all look alike.
Thanks.
Bob
475  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 headlight switch w /U17 console instruments on: December 31, 2009, 09:55:42 PM
You are looking in the correct group (2.485). The reason you can not find the service numbers I quoted is that they have been superseded in later parts books. That is the reason to try and use parts books that are printed for the model year in question.
A picture of the  67 (1995149 w/ U17) headlight switch would be greatly appreciated
Does anyone have a 67 parts book that would look up the two part numbers in question (1995147 & 1995149) and let us know what you find?

Maybe someone with a 67 parts book could see if there are 2 part numbers used in 67 for the headlight switch.

Maybe someone can help me look it up. I have a 65-75 Chevrolet parts catalog and I'm looking in group 2.485 which is switches - lighting. I can't find any of these numbers.. Am I looking in the right place?
I just got the manual on pdf. It's huge and I don't know how to use it yet.

For example, it lists three 69 Camaro swtches though..
w/o RS, w/o console inst. cluster (U17) 1995175
w/RS, w/o console inst. cluster 1995176
w/o RS, w/console inst. cluster 1995177
w/RS, w/console inst. cluster combination not shown but w/o RS, w/console inst. cluster is listed twice. However, below this combo is 1995177 but U17 makes no mention of a different switch.

The 69 AIM lists 1995175 as non RS UPC12-B2
RS as 1995176 and RS w/U17 1995177. RPO Z22-B7. Same deal. A different switch for U17, but only with RS.
All this time, I also thought there was just two.

Confused? Me too.. Tongue
476  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 power steering box on: December 31, 2009, 09:11:50 PM
I beleve 7806396 was the correct manual steering box. You might give Jerry M. a call , I am sure he knows.

I am not sure what casting number was used for the 67 Z/28 steering box.was it 7826692?
477  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1967 LOW FUEL MODULE ? CAN ONE BE REPAIRED ? on: December 27, 2009, 01:07:04 PM
Brad,
Never had a bad module to back door engineer to see what is inside.
Let us know what you find.

I've just learned that the fuel module has a FUSE ? or BULB ? in the back of it ? I am going to check that
478  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 headlight switch w /U17 console instruments on: December 24, 2009, 10:42:10 PM
JohnZ,
The 68 AIM 12 B6, revision 1, Dated 6-29-67, verifies what you said is correct. My 69 parts book also gives the 164 as the correct number.
Was the RS option available at the start of production on the 67?
Tom,
Looking at the std. and RS wiring diagrams, shows no need for a different switch (all wiring is the same at the switch).
Maybe someone with a 67 parts book could see if there are 2 part numbers used in 67 for the headlight switch.
Does anyone have a picture of a 1995149 headlight switch?

Merry Christmas to all.
479  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 headlight switch w /U17 console instruments on: December 23, 2009, 10:58:48 PM
Does anyone know why there are 2 67 headlight switches. Std.1995147 and 1995149 w/U17. Does the 149 have a higher rated light dimmer for the console ? See VPC 12 B6 and revision 4. Huh
480  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: AM-FM on: December 15, 2009, 11:43:34 PM
Does that hold true for the rear fender mast as well?
not wanting to hijack a thred,but did the fm radio option require a differnt antenna than what was used for the standard am radio? anyone have a pic of a front am/fm antenna?

Only the screw-on mast was different - the same base was used for both applications.
not wanting to hijack a thred,but did the fm radio option require a differnt antenna than what was used for the standard am radio? anyone have a pic of a front am/fm antenna?

Only the screw-on mast was different - the same base was used for both applications.
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 38
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.42 seconds with 18 queries.