CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 19, 2014, 12:35:00 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107513 Posts in 12506 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 35
466  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: cruise master-air filter on: April 26, 2009, 11:44:06 AM
John,
I too am searching for a filter for my 67 K30. I am in the process of restoring the c/c componets and appreciate the pictures you supplied.
What color wires go to the controller?
What did you clean the controller with?
Pictures of other componets would be greatly appreciated.
Bob C
467  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: interior headliner chrome trim on: January 29, 2009, 11:55:38 AM
Tinman 57,
The trim you are inquiring about was  an RPO Z23 option which included the trim you you are asking about in 67 only. The RPO Z23 option was available in 68 and 69  but did not include  ( I believe) the trim you are asking about.
Bob C

just need to know what year camaro received this trim in the deluxe interior? Was it just 67, 68 or 69 or all?
just need to know what year camaro received this trim in the deluxe interior? Was it just 67, 68 or 69 or all?
468  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: what style oil pan for bb? on: January 22, 2009, 06:50:04 PM
I have a 67 camaro, putting a 454 big block in it, what style oil pan to fit in it? Standard??? Help!
All  67,68,69 factory installed BB Camaro oil pans were the same.
Bob C
469  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 throttle rod bracket @ firewall ( metal to plastic) on: December 17, 2008, 01:33:50 PM
Update:
In regards to 2 BB throttle levers (use 67 AIM L35 A11 as reference) Item #3 . The change in the revision record 2-8-67 1 may be a change from the SB lever to the BB lever. I do not under stand that being the case as the 396  L35 was new production in 1-?-67 and there would be no need for a revision, unless some of the early production BB had SB levers. A comparison of some of the early and late BB leavers might shed some light on the matter.Someone with a 67 PM might be able to reference the part numbers.     3879422 and 3912599
Kurt,thanks for the info.
Bob
470  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: First production date for 67 L35 and L78 on: December 17, 2008, 12:52:17 PM
Kurt,
Thanks for the info. I guess after searching 79 threads I must have missed it. Just did not ask the right question.
The 396 L35 started production in January (build date) of 67 according to what CRG has found to this date? Correct?
This information now makes me wonder about some of the info I used from the 67 AIM in 2 topics that I have in this forum.
Thanks again.
Bob
471  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / First production date for 67 L35 and L78 on: December 16, 2008, 01:56:54 AM

I am of the understanding that the release date for the 67 L35 & L78 was in Nov.66. If this is true Huh?? then when was the first L35 or L78 actually produced?

Thanks,
Bob
472  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Pully Misalignment on: November 10, 2008, 09:07:11 AM
Did you take the air pump and alt. brackets off during your cosmetic restoration?
Check the alignment of the crank pulley and the water pump pulley.
Bob
473  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / verification of 67 BB Camaro starter solenoid wire harness retainer clip on: November 09, 2008, 08:49:41 PM
Trying to verify if solenoid retainer clip went into production.
Only seen one and it was on a 68 BB.
Please use 67 AIM 12 A9 #7 3906181 clip,68 AIM 12 A11 or 69 AIM 12 A7.
Thanks.
Bob
474  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1967 camaro front springs on: November 04, 2008, 05:53:57 PM
Use 67 AIM, add up RPO"s,  it will tell you the height and where to measure (providing you have the correct tires and wheels).
Bob
475  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: camaro markings on: November 04, 2008, 12:13:15 PM
Thanks,
Bob
476  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: What is the correct coil for my COPO on: November 04, 2008, 12:10:26 PM
Try to use P&A's(69)that are as close to the year AIM's (69) as possible. This cuts down on GM part # substitution. Try to get verification from at least 2 references.
Both cars are (will be) drivers and will be shown. I have taken some latitude with some of the RPO"s ( 7 blade fans etc.), gets hot here in FL.
Bob
477  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: '67 center console on: November 04, 2008, 11:25:46 AM
I think the process of restoring the console with paint would be complicated. The chrome would have to be thoroughly sanded, etched,filled,primed,chromium paint and then cleared. If done correctly the results looks good but there is no substitute for chrome. The black is easy, thoroughly sand, etch, prime and spray black.
You could search EBay and swap meets for a console that is in better shape than yours but a really good console would cost more than 350.00.

Call Advance plating (or any of the really good chrome shops) and inquire if and how much ( hold onto your hat). This would only be done if you needed an original console or you have a fat wallet.

If you do not absolutely need an original and looks are important then the 350.00, even it is a little expensive, is the best alternative. You can try to sell your console at a swap meet or EBay and re-coupe some of your money.
This is my opinion, and what I will do with the 67 I am restoring.
Bob
478  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: camaro markings on: November 04, 2008, 12:13:09 AM
JohnZ,
Would it be possible that a line worker used this to indicate something to another co-worker during a shift change (a start or finish of a particular procedure)?
The tire would have covered it up and none the wiser.
Just curious.
Bob
479  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 distributor on: November 03, 2008, 11:32:34 PM
Just checked 1111169 and 1111170 and they do not have a GM logo. Checked some HEI dist. and one had a DELCO logo on it.
Bob
480  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: What is the correct coil for my COPO on: November 03, 2008, 10:55:27 PM
Jim,
The coil and bracket are an engine assembly, so the 69 AIM would be of little help.
In this case I used the Chevy By The Numbers and the GM 69 P&A (rev 10-1-69). The CBTN on page 242 shows the 1111499 dist. used on the 69 396 & 427. To verify this I used the 69 P&A 2.361 page 2-24.
The 69 P&A group 2.170 page 2- 4 shows 3 coils 1115202 (1.8 OHM resistance too high), 1115207 (TI coil), 1115238 (1.3 OHM correct resistance).The 293 number you mentioned is used by Rick"s but I think that is an GM assembly number for the coil and bracket. Look at 298 w/cowl induction and 270 wo/cowl induction in Rick's cat.,now go to the 69 P&A group 2.183 page 2-6. 1966876 w/cowl hood and 1971011 wo/cowl hood. The brackets are different not the coils.
Sorry it took so long to respond be am working on a 67 Camaro and 67 Corvette and they take up a lot of my time.
Bob
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 35
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 18 queries.