CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2015, 07:00:49 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
111356 Posts in 12823 Topics by 4913 Members
Latest Member: devodave
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 38
436  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 low fuel light? on: July 02, 2010, 04:37:39 PM
Look at RPO code U17 if you install the Gauge package. Check out the AIM under UPC U17 A1, gives a lot of detail on the gauge wiring harness.
Bob
.

 ???I could not find a RPO code in 67 for a low fuel warning light. Was this option available in 67?  If so, where would it appear? On the dash or in the gauge package? Was it just a warning light or did it say Low Fuel? Reason I ask, I am in the process of installing a new underdash harness in my 67 Camaro. I have the gauge package on the floor console and it is a automatic. There is a connection I can't find where its goes from the harness. I have all the dash hooked up, the glove box light, ash tray light , cigarette lighter etc etc. Or is this there in case some one has it and instead of having to buy a special harness it is included in the harness.? I bought the harness through Rick's First Gen. Pretty simple to install and really cleans up the underdash.

dab67
437  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct 4 screws for the 69 4 speed boot retaining ring. on: July 02, 2010, 04:07:26 PM
Pan tapping screw 8-18x7/8 31od , no washer, chrome.
AMK has them B-11150 8pcs for $3.00, $30.00 min. order.
Bob
Can anyone tell me the type of screw and whether it has a captured washer or not and the type of anodizing; for the retaining ring for a 4 speed car with a console?

Thanks,
Will
438  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 cross-member to sub-frame mounting hardware on: June 23, 2010, 06:19:24 PM
With approx. 900,000 cross-member bolts used in 67 there must be someone with a picture of an original bolt.
Bob
439  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 rally sport relay bracket on: June 21, 2010, 01:01:05 PM
Buddy,
Do they also have three hash marks?
Is the washer captured or part of the bolt?
Bob
the originals on my 67 rs/ss are rbw head markings, and the washers are attached.
buddy
440  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 rally sport relay bracket on: June 12, 2010, 09:36:54 AM
SSMUNDY,
Thanks for the reply, and yes those are the screws I am looking for, but I am trying to find the description and head markings of original screws.
You would think that with almost 65,000 RS units being built there would be a couple of originals around to get a consensus.
I am also trying Team Camaro and have had some responce but head markings are still a concern.
441  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 rally sport relay bracket on: June 10, 2010, 09:51:17 AM
Anyone have a description of the original 67 screws #2-38?5554 that are used to hold the relay bracket asm. to the fender, shown in AIM Z22 B7?
Thanks.
Bob
442  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 396 power steering hose question on: June 07, 2010, 10:01:04 PM
KurtS,
The 69 AIM N40 A9 shows your replacement hose to be correct for a SB.The one rick has is for a BB, smaller s bend.
I think the the s bend was an attempt to gain a little power steering fluid cooling.
Also note the sleeves on both lines. I see your replacement has the sleeve and ricks still does not have the sleeves.
Sleeves are not repo-ed.
Bob
That length is real close to my hose. I'm guessing that's what it is - the bends look close.

Per my 11/68 parts book, for 67-68, there's 2 V8 pressure hoses.
One for 67 327 and 350. One for 67 396 and all 68 V8's.
443  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 396 power steering hose question on: June 07, 2010, 09:16:45 AM
The exposed rubber section on my 67-68  hose is 18 1/2". Does not have s-bend, looks like the one ricks sells.
The two hoses you indicated to would be for v-8 and l-6 correct?
Bob

Hmm, wonder if my hose is the 67-68 hose? There's supposed to be two different 67-68 ones, but everyone only sells one version these days:
http://www.rickscamaros.com/camaro-power-steering-pressure-hose-1967-1968.html

The exposed rubber section on mine is 19" long btw, if someone has one of these laying around to compare.
444  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 crossmember to subframe mounting hardware on: June 06, 2010, 06:37:17 PM
Have done a search, but the question about the description of the original hardware was never completely answered.
The picture of an original bolt can no longer be opened.
So, can someone with an original 67, with original 67 hardware, be so kind as to give us a description of the bolts, washers, lock washers and nuts? I would like to have a description of original 67 hardware because 68,69 hardware may have changed. If you have 68,69 original hardware please give description so others with those years may benefit.
Thanks,
Bob
445  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 AC lower shield on: June 05, 2010, 11:33:21 AM
Mark C,
Thanks for the pictures, greatly appreciated.
Bob
446  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 AC lower shield on: June 04, 2010, 11:45:41 AM
Mark ,
Do you have any additional pictures other than the one shown?
Does anyone else have pictures other the John and Mark?
It's a reproduction of an original part.   I believe it was made by a guy with the screen name of markx22 on Camaros.net.  He built it off the remnants of an original.

Heres the thread that the pictures came from originally:

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=79753
447  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 V32 rear bumper guard on: June 04, 2010, 07:36:07 AM
Your's is the 2nd set of nos guards and hardware I have seen and they are both the same, including hardware, good find. What is the O.D. and how thick was the washer in your kit?
Now the question remains , at least for me, what hardware was used on the original factory 67,68 installation.
Did the lower hex machine screw asm. have an inside lock washer or was it a conical washer like the one's used in the nos assembly.
The 67,68 AIM shows a wielded on nut on the lower bracket but all I have seen have a pierced hole with 3/8-16 threads.
Thanks for the responce, greatly appreciated.
Bob

Here is some nos hardware from some nos rear bumper guards I have. I am not positive these are just like the factory installed ones.
Scroll down for the pics I posted on TC.

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=171217&highlight=nos+bumper+guards
448  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Ground strap speedo pod on: June 03, 2010, 07:41:30 PM
Correct.
I guess the info I'm trying to understand is the type of ground used at the top of the cluster.  The info seems to be that the round stiff wire around the high beam indicator is what came in 67's and was maybe used for some early 68's.  The flat strip was a later year change and is what should be on my car build date.  Then the additional ground wire at the bottom was added early in 1968 (which I have).
449  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 V32 rear bumper guard on: June 03, 2010, 01:44:58 PM
Petes L48,
Thank you for your responce.
Your description of #5 bolt has been confirmed by another member.
Your description of #3 bolt brings up a couple questions that you can confirm when you next visit your ride.

1-A is it a hex bolt w/a point? B is it a hex flange bolt w/a point? C is hex machine screw w/a point?

2-A is the star lock washer inside or outside? B is the lock washer captured to the #3 bolt (assembly)?

Head markings.

Is the #4 washer 1-flat? 2-conical? 3-conical w/dimples? 4-O.D. of washer and how thick?

I know this is allot to ask but I would like to rebuild my ride as correctly as possible.
Thanks again.
Bob


   
 
450  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Ground strap speedo pod on: June 02, 2010, 09:02:49 PM
Yes, and you should have the additional ground wire on the back of the cluster.
My car has the same ground strap pictured in reply #9. Hope this helps, RonM.

So, some time after Jan 2 1968, certainly in time for my car, it would have changed from the wire around the high beam light to the flat strip.
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 38
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.327 seconds with 18 queries.