CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2014, 07:22:45 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106498 Posts in 12421 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 35
436  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 68 AIM revision Date on: December 09, 2009, 09:09:36 PM
To anyone with 68 AIM,
Need to know the 1st revision date on K30 A2 #1, looks like 5 ? 67. This will answer some questions about my 5E build.
Thanks,
Bob
437  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct 1968 AC Compressor Identification on: October 16, 2009, 10:06:17 AM
Mike,
Compressor is in good shape , just need % of gloss black and if "OK" stamp was used in 67.
438  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct 1968 AC Compressor Identification on: October 15, 2009, 10:48:55 PM
What % gloss black was used on the 67 AC compressor ?
Did the compressor get a final inspection OK stamp ?
439  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: production run numbers on: October 09, 2009, 10:06:07 AM
I purchased the car in 1970 from a car rental firm. Auto crossed it for 2 years ( the body was completely striped of unnecessary weight and then all GM optional equipment added) and then put it in storage where it has been ever since.
Can I expect to find run numbers on most of the sheet metal componets used to build the body ?
Is 67 05E week 22 ?
440  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / production run numbers on: October 08, 2009, 03:39:29 PM
Did a search but could not find a lot of information on run dates . One question in particular was brought up but was not answered.
What is the acceptable relation between run dates (week) and body build date (week) ?
I have a 67 05E build with run dates on the R door of H17, L door H18, gas neck cover H15. Looks like the run dates are falling in line but are these dates within the correct range of an 05E build?
Is a 67 05E a week 21 or 22 ?
441  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct 1968 AC Compressor Identification on: June 09, 2009, 09:55:07 PM
KertS,
Thanks for the info.
Anyone have a 5E or later build that can verify that  the old sticker w orange text at the bottom was being used at the end of the year?
What % gloss black was used on the compressor?
Bob
67 is the same part #, but it uses the old style sticker with orange text at the bottom.
I think it was used all year, but I'm not positive....
442  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Cluster lens for "high beams" and "low fuel"...'67 camaro on: June 08, 2009, 09:01:35 PM

ED.
How close to scale is the picture?
Thanks for the picture, great shot!
Bob
P/N 6457873 used in 67 and 68.

Ed


P/N 6457873 used in 67 and 68.

Ed


443  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Cluster lens for "high beams" and "low fuel"...'67 camaro on: June 08, 2009, 03:56:30 PM
 You wouldn't possibly have a picture of the low fuel lens would you?
Bob
Well, I know the low fuel film is not repro'd.  I have a 68 with one and have seen them on e-bay before, very expensive.  I am looking at selling my console, tach and fuel lens at some time in the future, but not yet.  As far as the high beam, I think it's just a plain red film isn't it?  You could just cut out a piece of red film to fit for that.
444  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: group number on: June 08, 2009, 03:01:30 PM

Paul,
I think John is on the power tour.
Bob
Paul - If you get time - Can you email me a scan of the cruise section in your 69 P&A to compare with the 67 I got from Phillip?
I would like to cross reference it.

John -

I've been out of town.  I'll try to get that info to you this week.

Paul
445  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Correct 1968 AC Compressor Identification on: June 05, 2009, 01:03:49 PM
Kurts,
Can I assume the correct model # for a 67 is the same (6550133)?
Are all 1st gen decals red & black?
Was wondering is the 67 decal different in size since the muffler bracket goes around the body and would cover the lower red portion  of the decal.
I have seen pictures of the 67 w/bracket and the red portion of the decal is not covered. This indicates to me the decal must be longer, therefor different.
Bob
446  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 throttle rod bracket @ firewall ( metal to plastic) on: June 05, 2009, 11:41:44 AM
Could someone with a very late production date  (at least 5E or later) look and see if their  bracket is plastic or metal? The 67 AIM shows production # 3924409 and 68 AIM shows production # 3924409. Could some one with a 67 & 68 P&A check to see if these production numbers  where carried over to 67 to 68 as service numbers? The 69 P&A shows 3924409 as the service replacement but that would be expected. If 3924409 shows up in the 67 P&A then some of the brackets could have been in late 67 production.
Support is in group 3.452 and lever is in group 3.454 in the 69 P&A, could be different in the 67,68 P&A.

Just thought I would run this by the members again. Huh

Rat Pack, thanks for the info. on the finish of the levers.

Kurts, did you ever post the info. about the AIM procedures?
Bob
447  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Accelerator lever color on: June 05, 2009, 09:35:32 AM
Thanks for the reply.
Bob

Bob, I tried taking some pictures but the flash makes them appear lighter than they actually are. I would say go with a more gray than black phosphate vs. light/dark. I have always had them redone in a gray color with the hood hinges and latch assy.............RatPack................
448  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Trunk Spatter Paint Color for 1st Gens. on: June 04, 2009, 11:02:39 AM
Am I correct in assuming there was never carpet or liner installed by the factory?
Deluxe interior received trunk mat.
Bob
449  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Trunk Spatter Paint Color for 1st Gens. on: June 04, 2009, 09:14:33 AM

So you are saying that the trunk and cover where spatter painted at the same time  then the cover was installed later  in the production process. Does anyone know where the cover was actually spatter painted ( in the trunk on a wire or off line)?
What color is the back of the cover? Some % of black or body primer?
Bob
Chris.....I have a 07C 1968 Norwood car.  Haven't had a chance to get to the garage with the camaro but I did go by and look.  It has a coating of black and white speckle and the gas filler cover is speckled but the screw looks like a regular phosphate one and it appears to be speckled behind the filler tube as well.

Hope that helps...
Jerry G.
450  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: cruise master-air filter on: June 04, 2009, 08:42:23 AM
Sorry, that should be Kurts !

John,
I would try Kerts. I am sure he could tell you how to document the system. I do not think that CRG has very much information on the RPO K30 system as it has to be one of the rarest of the RPO's, you could count the survivors one one hand.
Congradulations on a great find. Grin
Bob
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 35
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.105 seconds with 18 queries.