CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 06, 2015, 02:36:03 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
110475 Posts in 12763 Topics by 4892 Members
Latest Member: jvc7450
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 38
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 windsheild wiper motor on: February 03, 2015, 01:35:57 PM
I did not have any date stamp my 67 motor and not sure that they did. Maybe someone could confirm this one way or another.
With so many cars 912 (?) being produced per day, I would think the a build date on the motor of one month prior to car build date would even be a stretch.
I would rebuild your motor without date stamp and stamp it when you have proof that they were stamped with correct date.

MikeS, do you have date stamps on your motors?

Bob
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: routing of a/c hoses on: February 03, 2015, 11:02:25 AM
Do you have the clip #9 and retainer#10 that is shown in the AIM?
Bob
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 68 rear bumper insert. on: February 03, 2015, 12:57:53 AM
What type of original fastener 9419842 was used on bumper guard insert? Are the ones that AMK show correct?
Bob
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: routing of a/c hoses on: February 02, 2015, 11:15:02 PM
Looking at the 67 AIM C60 D3, your hoses go through #6 grommet, under the fenderwell and are clamped #9 clip to the front under side of the fenderwell. You will see that the hoses go above the extensions to the condenser.
bob
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: a/c hose sizes on: February 01, 2015, 08:58:36 PM
Muffler is correct, 12 (5/8" ) on muffler rear goes to POA, 10 on muffler front goes to condenser 10 upper. Both hoses are 8's on drier, one going to the condenser 8 lower and the other going to the expansion valve 8. Your condenser should have 10 ( 1/2" ) on top and 8 ( +3/8" ) on bottom. There are only 3 hose sizes and if you follow my explanation you will have your routing.
Bob
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruise control diagram 68 camaro on: January 15, 2015, 01:00:33 PM
I would bet that the regulator off any GM car would work.
If both speedometer outlets are pointing towards the firewall no. The original has one of the outlets pointing down at right angle.
Bob
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruise control diagram 68 camaro on: January 15, 2015, 12:48:47 PM
Same as 67 and bracket is 3927351.
Bob
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruise control diagram 68 camaro on: January 15, 2015, 09:27:57 AM
Without the regulator that is mounted on the fenderwell you are out of business. You will have to find one (67/68) as that is the heart of the CC system and they are very rare.
Bob
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruise control diagram 68 camaro on: January 15, 2015, 08:50:27 AM
Replacement CC levers can be found on eBay but are expensive. CC with tilt is a factory option ( RPO K30 and RPO N33 ), all you need is a screw to mount the lever to the turn signal assembly.
I believe someone tried to install factory CC parts in your build and that is why we need the pictures of all the parts.
Do you have a 68 Assembly Instruction Manual ( 68 AIM )? You need to get one or down load file from this site as it will make reconstruction of the CC system easier and would not need all the pictures.
Bob
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: January 14, 2015, 11:07:22 PM
Kurts,
That is true but in this case every example has taken around 7/9 weeks give or take between assembly and installation.
T0106  02E
T0131  03C
T0214  04E
T0308  05B
Bob
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruise control diagram 68 camaro on: January 14, 2015, 10:38:51 PM
Nice shot of tilt column, the CC lever goes where the silver turn indicator is. Which side of brake booster, picture of lines would help.
Will be leaving for weekend tomorrow and will not be back until following Tuesday.

Bob
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruise control diagram 68 camaro on: January 14, 2015, 10:33:07 PM
Bottom picture is a 67/68 servo and is correct.
Need to see regulator.
Could you get a picture of the pink wiring on the fuse box with it disconnected from fuse box?
Bob
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: cruise control diagram 68 camaro on: January 14, 2015, 10:20:58 PM
Try to get some pictures of the servo ( round thing under the wiper motor with the chain on it) and the regulator ( thing mounted on the left fenderwell that has 2 speedometer cables attached to it )
Your picture does not show much detail but it looks like the end of a CC switch / lever assembly with the lever removed. Wire colors should be Brown, Blue, Black at the plug end, a close up would be nice.
Bob
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: January 14, 2015, 04:54:05 PM
LVN 67 has an engine date stamp of T0106 and a build date of 02E. Does anyone have a production engine assembly date earlier than that? 
I know CRG has some January 01? body builds on file. I wonder what the engine dates are on them, as it took 7 weeks to get the engine into LVN's 02E build.Grin
Bob
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: January 11, 2015, 05:48:41 PM
Remember that the dipstick and tube are unrelated to the engine assembly date - they were installed at the car assembly plant.
John Z,
This brings up a question I have wondered about for some time.
If the production of L35's started on January 1, then how could they assemble engines ( T ), ship them to the plant for dress and installation on the same day?
Does this mean that there are L35's with date codes of T12?? or possibly T11?? and could L78's have earlier dates than T03?? ?
Just how long would the lead time be for bringing an RPO of this type into production? I know that the 396 was in production for use in other models but things like exhaust manifolds and oil pans are specific to Camaro's
Thanks as always. Grin
Bob

You're assuming production started on Jan 1. I've never seen that in writing that I recall.

Lead time - for what aspect? Filling the pipeline, from where to where?
Design to production?
Kerts,
You are correct, that is why I started the question with If. I was hoping that someone would correct my assumption. Do you know when the first L35 was stamped for Camaro production? Do you know what week the first L35 was built. How about the first ones you have in the data base for both questions?
As for lead time, from the date stamp on the first L35 engine at the Tonawanda NY engine plant to the engine holding area at Norwood or would that be based on number of engines ordered by Nor? I would imagine that they were sent to Nor. in batches. Grin
Bob
.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 38
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 18 queries.