CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 01, 2014, 04:02:35 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103764 Posts in 12186 Topics by 4698 Members
Latest Member: Ed miles
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 32
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise Control Installation Instructions on: August 20, 2014, 07:20:23 PM
Try this again
BC
This is the first design factory installed clip and is held in place with a screw.
Bob
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise Control Installation Instructions on: August 15, 2014, 01:32:27 PM
Good picture in 67 AIM K30 A3. Second design clip but installed the same. Also shows hole location for screw that holds the clip to the throttle lever.

Does anyone have a picture and dimensions of the screw in question? Because of the hole drilled in lever I would think it would be around 1/4-14 tapping screw but just guessing.
Bob
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise Control Installation Instructions on: August 15, 2014, 12:23:35 PM
BC,
Your picture is of the first 67 design. There was a factory part revision in 4 6 67 that changed your 3904186 clip to 3919006 clip that is shown in John's picture and was carried over into 68.
Could you show a picture and dimensions of the screw  9418359 that holds the clip to the throttle lever? It is the same for 67 and 68.
Bob
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise Control Installation Instructions on: August 13, 2014, 04:43:01 PM
John,
Glad to see you are still around.
Bob
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: TH400 Kickdown Harness Clip on: June 19, 2014, 08:33:01 PM
Bob,
No reproduction of the clip is being made.
Best bet would be to check the junk yards for big GM 67, 68 and 69 cars and trucks,  they all used T400 transmissions.
You could also run add on TC.
I saw no response so figured I would at least give you some ideas.
Bob

PS Does your BB 68 have AC ?
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 AC Muffler on: June 18, 2014, 10:22:13 PM
The 3923194 is the muffler for BB only as seen in the AIM C60 D3 in the upper picture that is misidentified as V-8 Engine, should be 396 Engine. The lower picture with incomplete identification L-6 Engine, should be All other Engines except 396.
A further identification in the AIM C60 D4 identifies hose routing for all engines except 396 but view A and B  of same page shows muffler and hose routing for BB
with clamp on right fenderwell, BB ONLY.
The clip 382770, screw 9419380, clamp 3925746 and caps ( 3738197 ) are what I was referring to about trying to get a picture of as I  vaguely remember them on my BB 68.
Bob
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 AC Muffler on: June 17, 2014, 02:48:23 PM
There is a repo 68 muffler on eBay that looks like the one I had on my original 68 BB. If you want original, then you maybe in for a long wait.
The AIM shows the correct routing of the hoses and all parts as it left the factory. Unless you can find an original 68 survivor built 11B then the AIM is the Best way to go.
Steve,
Do you have the fender hose bracket on your 68? If it does, can you get a picture of the protective caps used on the screws? Have been trying to find out they look like for years.
Bob
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 68 AC Muffler on: June 17, 2014, 09:33:44 AM
In this case trust your 68 AIM as being correct if you want the system to look original.
The clamp was used in 67 only.
Bob
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise control? on: June 17, 2014, 09:08:40 AM
I don't have the 67 aim yet but on order. Just had car short time and in info mode right now.
It's a late 66 build and attempting to get all working as stock. Cruise does work but hunts bad.

You  should check the Vac. release switch as it is the main cause of vac. problems.
Bob
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise control? on: June 16, 2014, 11:54:26 PM
Everything you need for correct installation is in the 67 AIM. Do not use 68-69 info as CC system installation was changed in 68.
Wiring was changed and firewall piercing was changed for new servo bracket. Vac. line routing hole piercing was also changed.
Get the 67 Chassis Service Manual for description of components and how they work. Get the books you will need them.
Your servo should have 2 vac. lines as servo is the same for all 3 years.
Bob
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Dimmer Switch 3841892 Grommet? on: June 16, 2014, 10:19:53 PM
Update,
Did a search on Alliance Plastics Company and found that they were formed in 1968.
Steve was right on about the ones on eBay being for later production.
Anyone with an original 69 please verify the manufacturer of your dimmer switch grommet so this thread can be completed.
Bob
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original 67 4 Way 552 and Turn 323 Flashers - 1381303 round & 3836338 square on: June 15, 2014, 09:08:46 PM
His67PC,
Thanks for the reply. Your picture of the silver 552 Tung Sol flasher is interesting.
I have decided to narrow my search to the Tung Sol 552 flasher that may have been used in my 67.
I will start the list with your silver 552 TS flasher.

Silver 552 SAE J945 Pat RE 24023
Gold    "     "     "         "          "                Long Island Corvette
Silver 552 DOT       Pat 3218415      eBay
Gold    "     "               "          "                  One I have and also seen on eBay

Now some history.
Congress establishes DOT Oct 15 1966.
DOT starts operation Apr 1 1967.

Any one venture a guess as to which flasher could be used in an 05E build 67 ?
  
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 N33 Tilt Column 7803779 on: June 15, 2014, 08:16:08 PM
John,
Thanks for the reply.
Bob
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 N33 Tilt Column 7803779 on: June 13, 2014, 10:38:07 PM
Can anyone with 67 or 68 P&A verify that 7803779 is the correct tilt column  with floor shift for 67.
Do not understand what 67 AIM N33 A1 revision 9 is implying (usage revised).
Bob
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Original 67 4 Way 552 and Turn 323 Flashers - 1381303 round & 3836338 square on: June 09, 2014, 08:38:12 PM
I am looking for information on 67 year flashers as 68 and 69 had different flashers.
Have done searches here and on TC but very, very little info. on flashers.
When did the DOT script first start on the flashers?
Who were the major suppliers? I found Tung Sol and Wagner (?) but Tung Sol seems to be the most widely used.
Most widely used flasher is the round rather than the square type.
What was the reason for optional flashers? Was the RS option Z22 one of the reasons?
Anyone have pictures of original flashers?
Thanks,
Bob

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 32
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.307 seconds with 18 queries.