CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2014, 12:57:16 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97474 Posts in 11715 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22
301  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Trunk Spatter Paint Color for 1st Gens. on: June 02, 2009, 07:39:29 PM
Pex,
Check your e-mail for trunk pictures. Hope it helps.
  VTFB68
302  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 AIM sources on: April 11, 2009, 11:57:29 AM
Hi guys,
 I have a 1968 "FACTORY ASSEMBLY MANUAL" that i found about thirty years ago, it's a copy from DRAFTING GRAPHIC # 3918855
it has many handwritten notes and dates in the revision box on the bottom of the pages. Is this considered the A.I.M.?
 Thank you all,
   VT
303  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Edelbrock's red camaro on: March 26, 2009, 12:23:17 AM
Hi guys,
I was wondering if anybody has ever checked out the red 67 SS "that came from the factory with a 327" becuse they ran out of 350s ? I remember this being a magazine car early on (I think one of the stories was "THE CAMARO THAT COULD"). I don't buy that the factory made so many big mistakes. It seems that a lot of people think their wrong part is somehow original. It was common in the late 70's early 80's to crash or buy a crashed muscle car an put all the good stuff on a stocker... we did a few... numbers ment nothing! Parts were cheap, labor was free. We also swapped out all the good parts we wanted when we sold or traded cars. I have gone through 7 early camaros through the years and still have many of the good parts, kept 1 original BB car. Our group went through dozens (Chevelles and Novas too) and i'm sure this was repeted throughout the hot rod world. People junked 302s becuse they did not know how to tune or drive them. Anyway any info on the Edelbrock camaro would be great to know.
  Thanks,
    Victor
304  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Competition plus rods on: March 18, 2009, 08:14:28 PM
 Hi Guys,
Thanks for the replys. Out of 23 rods not  single match, though the shifter and levers are correct. I will check the Long beach Hi-perf swap meet on Sunday, I may get lucky. Thanks again for the Info, picture, and advice.
  Victor
305  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 underhood lamp on: March 13, 2009, 11:52:17 PM
Jeff,
I have a 69 lamp and could take a picture if it would help you. I would need your e-mail .
Victor
306  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Competition plus rods on: March 13, 2009, 11:42:27 PM
Hi all,
Does anyone know or know where I can find the Correct part number  or rod numbers for a competition plus shifter? They may be in a bucket with about 20 others.  I will be using this to replace a muncie shifter (factory warranty replacement anyway) in a Stock BB car with a console and was wondering if anybody has any "heads up" on this. Also, does anyone have a picture of a Muncie stick stamped "MUNCIE" that they can post?  as this will be mated to the shifter.
 Thanks for reading and good luck on all your projects,
      Victor
307  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: panel stamping numbers on: January 29, 2009, 11:28:19 PM
Hi all,
To follow up on my post from yesterday: 05C LA RS/SS BB car... 1967 dated bumper jack instructions (notice the early version has less safety instructions?) also a square shaft jack, extra holes in the base, "CAMARO 1968" in an single line on the bumper stop
308  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: panel stamping numbers on: January 29, 2009, 10:55:34 PM
 JOHNZ,
Thank you for the timley reply, I still have time before the car is squirt ! Is there another way tp post photos? I still get a pop-up that says my attachment is lost, too long, too big... I hope to send finished photos when i get it back and reassemble it.
309  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: panel stamping numbers on: January 28, 2009, 10:01:54 PM
Hi All,
 I have a 05C LA car with the original 14 stamped hood and a better shape 17 hood. the car is at the body shop now. Is the 17 hood too close to the 23rd week that the car was assembled?  (red original primer, spoiler holes in the trunk, no pen marks behind the seat, no build sheet tucked anywhere inside the interior, I'll check the date of the jacking instructions later if any body still needs to know)
310  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Fisher Body Paint Shop on: January 28, 2009, 09:29:30 PM
05C Los Angeles car, Red primer. first time the interior has been disassanbled.I have many pictures but can not post on this site.
  Victor
311  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / picture library on: November 20, 2008, 11:32:47 PM
Hi all,
We were wondering if it would be possable or practical to create a photo library to go along with wealth of information at this site.
It would be great to be able to compair colors, punch fonts, locations, hardware, part changes, tags, textures, ect. ect. . .
Once again thanks to all that make this site happen.
                                                         VT
312  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Wheel clearnces on: June 28, 2008, 02:48:43 AM
Wayne,
The back spacing will not allow you to off-set the rims one more inch without rubbing. Factory 15 x 7's will give you the same back spacing and allow you to use the 245's w/o issues. weak springs will cause some rubbing on the inside of the wheel well while turning on dips, bumps, or driveways.
                                                                                                                  VT
313  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 "MUNCIE" stamp, D90 colors on: May 31, 2008, 12:25:33 AM
MMMMM.... I did not Know of a shifter recall,  thanks for that tid-bit. the bottom shifter housing that bolts to the cross member is blue. would there be any P/N's, date codes or any other way to tell if it original or replacement, also it does have a stablizer bar from the linkage
314  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1968 "MUNCIE" stamp, D90 colors on: May 30, 2008, 10:30:21 PM
Hi all,
 I have Two questions.
    1 Were in fact all 68 muncie shifters stamped MUNCIE? Mine is not.
     
    2 The paint page states that a 1968 Camaro painted LeMans blue should have the D90 stripe painted white, I saw no exceptions
        listed. My car has the RS black sill, rear BB black-out, the D90 stripe is visible in the sun through the $29.95 paint job that was
        on the car when I bought it in 1980 from the second owner. The car has a Black vinyal top. I power washed Earl's paint over
        the stripe and it is also black (white would be ulgy - Three tone paint !) The car was unmolested except for the radio was
        replaced, it had deep set 6" low-rider rims, and Ansen ground grabber traction bars. so I belive it is all original. any feed back
       or comments on these subjects would be great.
                                                                                                 Thanks,
                                                                                                 Victor
       
315  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Can anyone recommend a Quadrajet restoration service? on: March 13, 2008, 11:10:23 PM
sdkar,
 The carb shop in Santa ana Ca. does a great rebuild. i have used Mike many times, always with great results.
Check out his web page (i think it's the carb shop . com) All makes, models, years.
                                                                                                    VT
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.