CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 01, 2015, 06:04:10 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
110366 Posts in 12748 Topics by 4887 Members
Latest Member: Calz11
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 26
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What starting letter should my Plates have? on: February 25, 2015, 05:59:06 PM
Cars that came from other states would have to be issued new plates no matter what the year of the car and they would fall in line with whatever is being registered at that time.
    VT
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What starting letter should my Plates have? on: February 25, 2015, 10:40:10 AM
Danny,
 In those years all plates came through the mail from DMV (Sacramento I beleive) and were issued as cars were registered, some cars were sitting on dealer lots for months. My 68 08E was bought when it arrived at Champion Chevrolet
 (Manhattan Beach) it's black plates start with WPN, My 05C was bought and registered within a few days after it arrived at Ted Green Chevrolet (Torrance) it's plates start with XHS.
   Hope that helps.
    Victor
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 RS/SS "Numbers Matching on ebay... on: February 06, 2015, 12:37:17 PM
I believe the 350 was dropped at the introduction of the 396. only the pre BB SS's had the 350, same as the matching gas caps.
    VT
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Camaro Pilot Line Assembly Process and Procedures on: February 06, 2015, 12:31:01 PM
The June 1981 CONSUMER GUIDE classic car series CAMARO (volume 310) has a dozen pages of clay mock ups to running prototypes, the XP-836, prototypes with 13" wheels and round tail lights (with a Panther emblems), clay station wagon, the Waikiki and Caribe show cars and many more. this issue also has many 1967 Chevrolet publicity photos.
    VT
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: The straight skinny on post '65, pre-mid '70, Hurst shifter plating on: January 28, 2015, 05:14:21 PM
I have a 68 Camaro NOS Comp + aftermarket shifter (in the original box) tucked away for future use, Is there any info or numbers that would help with this topic? BTW is the mounting the same for a Small and big blocks? The off-set should not come into play as hursts are transmission mounted.
    VT
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Vintage 1967 Yenko photo's on: January 20, 2015, 06:11:32 PM
That bottom r/s trim sure looks to be one piece.
    VT
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: original engine on: January 13, 2015, 03:25:06 PM
The 1967 fisher calender is posted in the prototype thread.
     VT
8  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Wanted: Photos/Info of Bob Mcginty/ Don Smith Sungro Camaro on: January 08, 2015, 10:23:54 PM
The car also sports a RS tail panel.
    VT
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 15" X 7" Rallys clear everything on a '68 on: January 08, 2015, 03:37:30 PM
Danny,
  I deceided to keep you company! I would guess that the responses are few becuse there are a few factors to consider, Easy answer is yes. however not all 265.50.15's are the same size, stuffed wheels look awsome stopped but not always good for daily driving. If the springs/bushings are weak/sagging there will be lots of side shift causing rubbing to the inside of the fender wells. a full tank or passangers will lower your car a couple of inches. I have 295 50 15's euro T/A's tucked in my 68 with un-cut wheel mouldings (Multi-leaf springs with Anson ground grabbers,- bolt is in) The rims are 15 x 8 with a 4.5" back space. The only rub I have had was a bad dip on the 405 freeway at high speed. They must have rubbed the tops of the fender wells as there was no markings on the tires. Hope this helps.
     Victor
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Muncie ID help on: December 27, 2014, 11:16:46 PM
Thank you Paul,
 That was the info I was looking for.
    VT
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Muncie ID help on: December 27, 2014, 10:42:21 PM
P0428, I know is Muncie, built on April 28 ( of 1966) But 6Z125483 got me. I don't know the VIN MFG or the "Z" plant.
   Victor
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Camaro Z/28 Sequoia Green on: December 26, 2014, 12:05:03 PM
That car's VIN is two after mine. for the line process guys, my SCH # is J543, and the body # is 39094. would that mean that this car was four cars behind mine on the assembly line?
Not that that has any importance, but the closest to mine that I have seen.
     VT
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Camaro Pilot Line Assembly Process and Procedures on: December 18, 2014, 03:11:17 PM
 John,
   But did you solve the problem?
    Victor
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Camaro Pilot Line Assembly Process and Procedures on: December 17, 2014, 07:25:25 PM
Mark,
 I would think that the 05B cars were the hand built "true" pilot cars, and the 09B cars were used to test run the assembly line, pre-production.
    VT
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Motors Built Before Installed on: November 27, 2014, 03:01:27 PM
ds1,
 Is your car built in Ohio or California? does the trim tag read 05C?
   Thanks,
     Victor
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 26
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 18 queries.