CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 01, 2015, 08:53:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109385 Posts in 12661 Topics by 4867 Members
Latest Member: 69z-x77
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 26
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: The straight skinny on post '65, pre-mid '70, Hurst shifter plating on: January 28, 2015, 05:14:21 PM
I have a 68 Camaro NOS Comp + aftermarket shifter (in the original box) tucked away for future use, Is there any info or numbers that would help with this topic? BTW is the mounting the same for a Small and big blocks? The off-set should not come into play as hursts are transmission mounted.
    VT
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Vintage 1967 Yenko photo's on: January 20, 2015, 06:11:32 PM
That bottom r/s trim sure looks to be one piece.
    VT
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: original engine on: January 13, 2015, 03:25:06 PM
The 1967 fisher calender is posted in the prototype thread.
     VT
4  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Wanted: Photos/Info of Bob Mcginty/ Don Smith Sungro Camaro on: January 08, 2015, 10:23:54 PM
The car also sports a RS tail panel.
    VT
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 15" X 7" Rallys clear everything on a '68 on: January 08, 2015, 03:37:30 PM
Danny,
  I deceided to keep you company! I would guess that the responses are few becuse there are a few factors to consider, Easy answer is yes. however not all 265.50.15's are the same size, stuffed wheels look awsome stopped but not always good for daily driving. If the springs/bushings are weak/sagging there will be lots of side shift causing rubbing to the inside of the fender wells. a full tank or passangers will lower your car a couple of inches. I have 295 50 15's euro T/A's tucked in my 68 with un-cut wheel mouldings (Multi-leaf springs with Anson ground grabbers,- bolt is in) The rims are 15 x 8 with a 4.5" back space. The only rub I have had was a bad dip on the 405 freeway at high speed. They must have rubbed the tops of the fender wells as there was no markings on the tires. Hope this helps.
     Victor
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Muncie ID help on: December 27, 2014, 11:16:46 PM
Thank you Paul,
 That was the info I was looking for.
    VT
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Muncie ID help on: December 27, 2014, 10:42:21 PM
P0428, I know is Muncie, built on April 28 ( of 1966) But 6Z125483 got me. I don't know the VIN MFG or the "Z" plant.
   Victor
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Camaro Z/28 Sequoia Green on: December 26, 2014, 12:05:03 PM
That car's VIN is two after mine. for the line process guys, my SCH # is J543, and the body # is 39094. would that mean that this car was four cars behind mine on the assembly line?
Not that that has any importance, but the closest to mine that I have seen.
     VT
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Camaro Pilot Line Assembly Process and Procedures on: December 18, 2014, 03:11:17 PM
 John,
   But did you solve the problem?
    Victor
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Camaro Pilot Line Assembly Process and Procedures on: December 17, 2014, 07:25:25 PM
Mark,
 I would think that the 05B cars were the hand built "true" pilot cars, and the 09B cars were used to test run the assembly line, pre-production.
    VT
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Motors Built Before Installed on: November 27, 2014, 03:01:27 PM
ds1,
 Is your car built in Ohio or California? does the trim tag read 05C?
   Thanks,
     Victor
12  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Dana Chevrolet on: November 18, 2014, 10:41:03 AM
G/7, Jon,
 I got that date from the " the chevroletcamaro.com" site years ago, it has been updated but still cites the Dana 427 camaro being built 6 months before the first GM 67 396 camaro. Very early, With all the main players being close to GM's R&D department I still wonder if that car was/is a Prototype. It seems that there are prototypes missing and no BB prototypes accounted for. Hmmm.
      Victor
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 T400 Transmission Mount on: November 15, 2014, 03:46:36 PM
Big Iron,
   Non BB T400 mounts? What small block came with a T 400?  Would a new part number coincide with the introduction of the 396 ? ( the BB transmission cross members are also off-set)
    Victor
14  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Dana Chevrolet on: November 14, 2014, 12:14:52 PM
Jon,
  Is this the same car from the Sept. 66 Car Life magazine? I know back then the magazines had a long lead time, being a Sept. issue I have always wondered is this car was a early prototype body. Has anyone ever been able to blow up the trim tag picture? or know what happen to the car? and did Bill Thomas race cars supply the motor mounts?
   VT
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Help me with this cowl tag on: November 12, 2014, 01:06:01 PM
Keep in mind that input shafts can be changed during rebuilds.
    VT
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 26
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 18 queries.