Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hihorse

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16
211
Originality / Are these original?
« on: December 29, 2007, 07:38:52 PM »
Not sure about these ones, can someone verify if these are repro or original?

212
Originality / Re: 69 big block smog tubes????????
« on: December 29, 2007, 07:35:47 PM »
These are supposed to be original

213
Originality / Yellow marking on smog pump
« on: December 29, 2007, 05:35:10 PM »
There is a yellow paint mark on this survivor smog pump assembly, do you think it is a factory mark?
Also the pump (dated 20081Y) has a relief valve and all the clamps are dated 1 69, no wire on diverter(29297), is this original for an early car?

214
Originality / Re: 1969 z28 Driveshaft (early build 10d)
« on: December 28, 2007, 02:32:10 AM »
There is driveshaft# 3945540 listed in assembly manual.

215
Originality / Re: Cowl Hole for Induction wiring
« on: December 28, 2007, 12:17:52 AM »
Thanks, I never thought of that

216
Originality / Re: Cowl Hole for Induction wiring
« on: December 27, 2007, 11:36:40 PM »
looks like the hole is too far to the left, what do the experts think? Is this hole factory?

217
Originality / Re: Cowl Hole for Induction wiring
« on: December 26, 2007, 09:13:15 PM »
Sorry, this is a 1969 Camaro Cowl shot.

218
Originality / Cowl Hole for Induction wiring
« on: December 26, 2007, 07:31:09 PM »
What do you think of this hole for the induction wiring?

219
Decoding/Numbers / Re: L89 one 311 in the data base?
« on: December 26, 2007, 06:12:39 PM »
Claims to be original block with VIN derivative but deck was restamped.

220
Getting burned is not a good feeling. I almost got taken for a ride with someone I knew, he swore up and down that this 837 alt. he was selling was original but I noticed a depression where the 7 was and passed on it. I thought the alternator was questionable/odd  and just figured he bought it that way. Then I found out from someone else that it was in fact bogus and the 7 was altered by the guy that tried to sell it to me. Wow I was floored, I couldn't believe it what money does to people. This person has not tried to apologize for his actions. Its to bad because this person has educated himself on the cars and parts and now I just see him as a pathetic individual.

221
Originality / Is it my opinion but are Restamped parts becoming acceptable?
« on: December 24, 2007, 04:49:18 PM »
Why would anybody waste money on a restamped part if they had no intention on fooling anyone (judges, buyers etc.). I need a 837 alternator for my documented 1969 L78 Camaro and have never considered the restamp alternative, I prefer to put a blank casting untill I find a original one. In my opinion a restamp part or altered casting numbers are not OK by me.

222
Originality / Re: 1969 z28 Driveshaft (early build 10d)
« on: December 23, 2007, 04:54:25 PM »
Found driveshaft in my garage that supposedly came from early camaro with # 5675111 and E below. Any info is welcome.

223
Originality / Re: Original 69 big block crank pulley bolts
« on: December 23, 2007, 12:49:01 PM »
what is the original headmarking?

224
Originality / Re: 1969 z28 Driveshaft (early build 10d)
« on: December 23, 2007, 12:44:50 PM »
thanks for posting this, I am looking for info on a driveshaft for a 396/M20 car

225
Originality / Re: 69 big block smog tubes????????
« on: December 23, 2007, 12:36:37 PM »
NOS tubes do not look exactly the same as the ones that came on the cars originally in 1969

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16
anything