Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hihorse

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 16
16
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS Camaro N65 Space Saver Spare
« on: April 11, 2020, 04:21:39 PM »
would think there are two wheel assemblies , one assembly for cars equipped with L34 , L35 , L46 , L48 , L78 , PW7 and PW8 ( would come with 9793470 Inflator ASM) and other assembly would be your default (would come with 9793469 Inflator ASM). Both assemblies would have same "HI" stamped rim.

17
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS Camaro N65 Space Saver Spare
« on: April 10, 2020, 07:30:04 PM »
Thanks for that, wonder why  the part number would not appear in the assembly manual

18
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS Camaro N65 Space Saver Spare
« on: April 09, 2020, 09:41:28 PM »
for anyone thats interested,  told its XA code with Goodyear F 78 14

19
Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 SS Camaro N65 Space Saver Spare
« on: April 08, 2020, 11:43:53 AM »
thanks, i've read some threads on this option, but looking for a definitive code. N65 is on my cars option list from George Zapora.

20
Decoding/Numbers / 1969 SS Camaro N65 Space Saver Spare
« on: April 08, 2020, 12:24:13 AM »
Have a 12B 1969 SS Camaro what is the two letter code for the Spave Saver that the car would of had from the assembly line?

21
Originality / Re: Original Hurst Shifter or Not
« on: April 04, 2020, 09:58:54 PM »
I have a shifter pulled from an 03D Los Angeles car on my desk right now, and it is stamped '29D29C'
Please verify that 2nd  last digit is '9' or post pic of stamp. Thanks

22
General Discussion / Re: Rear End Housing Spring Perch Welding
« on: February 26, 2020, 09:20:51 PM »
Please post a pic of a jig, would like to copy it

23
Restoration / Re: Brake Booster Paint Marks??
« on: February 21, 2020, 03:17:55 PM »
Sorry, no disrespect in not replying sooner, I have been out for work the last several weeks.
Attached you will see a white round mark on the top, and a yellow round mark to the right. This booster was re-plated once before but it appears there was a master cylinder leak at some point after plating. Not sure what the previous owner was attempting to replicate? All other chalk marks and stampings seem to be very correct.
Unless someone tells me these marks are some very special, long lost one of a kind..... I will not put them back.
Thanks, Gary
Looks like it was already replated, marks may not be original?

24
Restoration / Re: '69 396 Smog tube repair
« on: February 18, 2020, 02:58:26 PM »
thank-you, appreciate the experiences that are shared.

25
Originality / Re: Is this a restamp?
« on: February 18, 2020, 02:53:46 PM »
assuming the 1100837 number is original , i had plans on using it on my '69 2D L78 camaro (N6042XX). I'm satisfied original date code to alternator is 9B19 and not 8B19 and not 0B19. Until i find a nice unrestored one ,one i have will do. I did pay more for it 'than just another 37A alternator core'. Thanks for all responses.

26
Restoration / '69 396 Smog tube repair
« on: February 17, 2020, 04:16:03 PM »
Has anyone attempted to repair a smog tube end (at the manifold)?  if you were successful ,how did you do it?

27
Originality / Re: Is this a restamp?
« on: February 16, 2020, 05:56:46 PM »
I'm curious why alter the date stamp on an otherwise legit looking part number?
bought this at a local swap meet from a guy that sold his Z, not sure if this  alternator was from his Z and never made it back on the car before he sold it or he just bought it as an extra. I bought the alternator thinking that it was original but nowadays I see many unrestored questionable ones on Ebay. So I wanted to post it here for analysis and scrutiny .

28
Originality / Re: Is this a restamp?
« on: February 15, 2020, 09:18:46 PM »

29
Originality / Re: Is this a restamp?
« on: February 14, 2020, 02:41:58 AM »
its a challenge to get a pic down to 200k, thanks for replies

30
Originality / Is this a restamp?
« on: February 14, 2020, 12:50:18 AM »
Year is buggered up, someone tried to stamp 8 over the 9, but is the part number a restamp?

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 16
anything