CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2015, 11:57:39 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112096 Posts in 12879 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 1968 SS hood ornaments on: March 02, 2010, 04:57:47 AM
04D, SS350, Stacks
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Rare Cowl Tag in NZ on: February 03, 2010, 03:31:08 AM
Hi Kurt,
My mistake, it is just an RS, not an RS/SS. Has all RS trim and badge features.
I believe it is a 210Hp 327 so yes there.
The tag appears to be original, not re-rivetted or anything.
I noticed there was no build date aslo, an oversight perhaps?
The build date of the engine seems to be close to the build date using the VIN build sequences suggesting it is all as it should be.
The partial VIN by the heater motor and on the front cowl panel all match.
The guy who has it is really passionalte about camaro's especially '68's.
He is a panel and paint fella who is as fussy as fussy gets.
It would be nice to confirm its originality for him.

Does the VIN show up in the database?

33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Rare Cowl Tag in NZ on: January 31, 2010, 03:23:15 AM
Here are a few pics of teh cowl tag, engine pad and speedo.
VIN is 124378L329357
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Rare Cowl Tag in NZ on: January 29, 2010, 12:25:17 AM
Hi guys, I hope the new year has been kind to you all.

Seeing as we are talking about odd cowl tags I thought I might add this one into the mix. (sorry for hijacking the thread)
A friend of mine here in NZ has  68 RSSS matching #s coupe that he imported from Japan with a strange tag,
There is none of the usual info on the tag.
what it does have however is the following stamped on the bottom part :

"This car finished with magic mirror acrylic lacquer."

The car is painted in Sea frost green (code P2)
 I will go and get a pic tomorrow and post it here.

It has electric windows, fold down rear seat, air con, U17 guage package with tic-toc-tach,

All partial vins match on the body and block etc.

Also interesting is that it has a speedometer that is marked up to 200 (Kph I assume)
The tacho yellow line is at 4700 to 5000 and then redline is 5000 to 7000RPM ( will look for identifying numbers or part numbers )
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Did 1968 cars with AC get Astro Ventilation door glass? on: June 10, 2009, 02:37:40 AM
My 04D car has had aftermarket side glass fitted at some atage ( Temperlite ). All the numbers are the same on all side windows and read from the outside.
The rear window is  factory fitted, dated LX-10. March 68 and is M75 tinted, Softray.
The front window is a Guardian, which I assume is aftermarket, Safety float, Shaded. Laminated,DOT22, with the A-S1 halfway up the pillar. All read from the outside.
Can anyone shed any light on this front screen?
I hope that helps, maybe not. But it explains why my car does not have the Astro ventr labels on the door glass.
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Did 1968 cars with AC get Astro Ventilation door glass? on: June 09, 2009, 04:49:13 AM
Good question.
My friend here in NZ has a 68 ragtop with AC and Astro Ventilation on the door glass.
It all looks original too.
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Aircon car? on: June 08, 2009, 01:08:59 AM
Thankyou very much for your close observations rat pack, JohnZ.
I have been for a very close look (now that I knnow what I am looking at) and can now see where the panel work has been done.
I will grab that system from my mates car and store till I pull the engine out.
Thanks a lot for your help.
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Aircon car? on: June 06, 2009, 10:26:57 PM
Hi guys, thanks for your input.
The car is in restored condition.
It was restored by the guy I bought it from and he tells me that it had no air con when it arrived in the country.
In other words, he did not remove it if it was ever there at all.
I have found that there is no ducting behind the ball vents which might explain the controls not working.
However, there are still no penetrations for the ball vent ducting into the firewall to connect to.
There is no evidence of a hole for the ball vent valve lever to poke through.
I cannot see where the cutout area for the plenum has been filled in although my panelbeater syas he can see it. (x-ray vision maybe)
All the glass is definately tinted green.
Rat pack,
Thanks for your input regarding the aftermarket aircon systems.
I would prefer to fit the factory system although it would appear I am in for a lot of body work to do so.
Hopefully some of you experts wall spot some tell tale clues in the pics Ihave uploaded.

Thanks again
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Aircon car? on: June 06, 2009, 10:18:30 PM
closeup of heater hoses. Very close to rocker cover
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Aircon car? on: June 06, 2009, 10:16:34 PM
passneger side ball vent, no hole for pull lever
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Aircon car? on: June 06, 2009, 10:14:49 PM
closeup of firewall enginebay side
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Aircon car? on: June 06, 2009, 10:13:26 PM
under glovebox looking up to heaterbox
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1968 Aircon car? on: June 05, 2009, 02:26:31 AM
Hello again everyone.
While trying to get the "ball vents" in the dash going I seem to have discovered that my  car may have originally had AC.
There are no penetrations from the cabin to the wiper cowl area up behind the dash for the ball vent ducting to connect to , similarly the ball vents do not have the little knob and lever to open and close the "flap" which turns on and off or restricts the air flow.
The heater controils are all out of whack.
There is no central vent in the radio trim panel.
It appears to have a standard heater box fitted in the engine bay and all looks as it should be for a non AC car in that respect.
All the windows have a green tint to them.
A panelbeater here has started all this when he mentioned to me that there was been a small patch or "AC Delete" plate welded into the firewall ( which I cant see ) up by the wiper cowl panel.
My problem is, I would like to get the venting system working correctly.

I have a couple of options.
1: Drill the holes in the firewall for the ball vent connections, I have not been able to get the plastic parts to mount to the firewall however.
2: Resurrect the original AC system, I can acquire a complete system from a firends car here who is making a hot rod and will be removing his AC
3: Install an aftermarket AC system, vintage air or similar.

Option 1 would be pretty much impracticle as I would have to tear the car apart.
Option 2 would be the best option as it retains all the correct parts but again means some serious surgery to undo what has been done.
Option 3 would appear to be the way to go as I understand they dont require a pump and would retro fit to my car fairly easily. Has anyone fitted one of these?

Before I do anything I want to make sure that I am not "barking up the wrong tree", so to speak.

Are there any other tell tale clues as to whether my car really did have AC fitted?
Were there any models that did not have the air vents ducted to the firewall

44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Door weatherstripping on: September 23, 2008, 02:15:29 AM
Ok I have bitten the bullet and have got partial set of Metro Super Softs weatherstrips out of Summit Racing Supplies. Door L & R, Frame L & R and boot (trunk) seal.

I will keep you all posted as to how they perform.
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Door weatherstripping on: September 07, 2008, 02:31:36 AM
Hi all.
I have had problems with closing the doors.
Basically I have had to open the door and with a hearty push swing them quite hard to get them to latch properly.
I have tried soaking the seals with Wurth rubber conditioner which didnt really make a lot of difference.
The car has been beautifully restored and in desperation I have removed the "new" seals that had been fitted.
I beieve they were bought from a classic industries agent down here.
I have a panelbeater freind who has had a similar problem and it seems to be the very end of the seal where it is flattened out whereby it is too hard to compress properly when closing the door.
We cut away this part and it was an improvement. However when we removed the entire seal we found that the door closes perfectly.... click....
All of the gaps are near perfect so it would seem that the seal is definately the problem
I have had a browse through the forums and it appears that the general consensus would be that the Metro brand seals provide teh best fit and cushioning when closing the doors.
I am proposing to replace only the seal that goes around the door. Would it be better to replace the door frame seals as well?
I would appreciate any input from other forum members as I am reluctant to place an internet order only to find out that I am no better off.
Thanks in advance
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.292 seconds with 18 queries.