Messages

31

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro #3916323 engine block

« on: February 27, 2008, 11:16:29 PM »

That shows that the 406 block was used till the end of prodution, well into July?   Also you did a GREAT job on updating the info on
your site. The details of your site are what makes it great.
Charlie

32

Decoding/Numbers / Re: trim tag is it OK 67 L78

« on: February 27, 2008, 08:27:39 PM »

Mark
according to crg web site the first car would be 100001.  So the 103345 would mean to me the 3345 car in production.  It shows both los and nor starting this way.  I went under the general info tab and thats what it shows.
My car starts with 249??? and is the 149??? car in production that comes out to be 2nd week in July
Charlie

33

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro #3916323 engine block

« on: February 27, 2008, 03:11:18 PM »

I just found a old posting for a engine of   TO7O5MY  7N253976
and casting of 406 block and dated as D-!-7
Was this block DOC as correct.
To me the assembly date would work for the vin dating in production.
This is in reguards to when the 406 went out of production for camaros

34

Decoding/Numbers / Re: trim tag is it OK 67 L78

« on: February 27, 2008, 12:24:02 PM »

I just looked at the picture of the cowl tag and it shows the 103345 which would make it made the first week of production for the 67 camaro.   I think the cowl tag date should be O8A for dating for car.  The 4K was not available yet. 

35

Decoding/Numbers / Re: trim tag is it OK 67 L78

« on: February 27, 2008, 12:09:26 PM »

I think it is a mistake.  The engine number of  20736 works out to be the 3rd week in April for production numbers.  Also the 103345 would be for a Sept. 66 car build.  Also my vin and my cowl tag number is only 50.

36

Decoding/Numbers / Re: Master cylinder question

« on: February 27, 2008, 02:18:49 AM »

If you are talking about a 1969 camaro that has a O6A build. I would say it is to late.  I looked at a 1969 calender and the 187th day is July 6th .  The first day of June in jullian dating is 152.  Hope this helps.  Sometimes i pull up old calendars on internet to look at these dates.   1967,1968,1969.

37

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro #3916323 engine block

« on: February 14, 2008, 12:05:21 AM »

Kurt
When i went to the  "67 model id " and hit that page.  I scrolled down and it showed the block casting numbers there in the list.  The only one listed for 67 was the 406 block.  That is the page i was looking at.  When i went to the 68 id there it showed both the 323 and 440 which is right.

38

Decoding/Numbers / 1967 camaro #3916323 engine block

« on: February 13, 2008, 05:51:26 PM »

This is also a good casting number for L78 camaros in late 67 production?   There is one for sale on camaro.net and this brought it to my attention that it only shows the "406 " for the 67 camaro on CRG.   I have talked to guys with the 323 block in these camaros  but have not seen first hand.  Is this true?  I was always told that late in production year you could have a 406 or 323 block?  I was thinking around last week in June and throught July?

39

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro manual disc master cylinder

« on: February 10, 2008, 06:56:41 PM »

The one on my July car has 318 for jullian date.  The other M/C i have has 87 for jullian date.  I would say that the D7 does not mean April.  I think yours might be Jan. 10 . Everyone i have seen has the D7 on them.  I am thinking your way on the disc usage for these cars, also thinking the lack of vacumme when racing.

40

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro manual disc master cylinder

« on: February 10, 2008, 01:14:27 PM »

If people have seen so many cars then why has this info not been posted yet. If i am reading you right you were saying that it was there but people really did not no it was different?  And yes i have seen the posting on the 8th but i was not sure where you were going with it? SORRY . I did not no YENKOL88 was the the same guy but i am trying to get people going on this to help "all' of us camaro guys out.  I am sorry if i pushed

41

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro manual disc master cylinder

« on: February 10, 2008, 02:15:08 AM »

YENKOL88
Looking at the post i am on on camaro.net  there is a guy with 4K car O5D date and has the exact numbers as you do.
We all need to stay with this until CRG changes the info on it's site.  This is correct for all camaro people!!!
Anybody else with info please help.

42

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro manual disc master cylinder

« on: February 10, 2008, 01:49:27 AM »

I honestly believe that chevy recomended this manual disc for 4K cars sometime during production.  I have owned my car for 23 years and out of all the camaro's i have seen over the years the only ones i have ever seen were 4K cars with this setup.  I am talking about the percentage of 4K cars compared to all other camaro's.  Z28 cars were not involved with this either.  So the research is not there in this car.  I am thinking if someone special ordered a car then that was done . But normal production 4K car i think came with this setup.(option)  The first car mentioned with this is above with a sb engine. First i ever heard of. 
YENKOL88 are you saying that your jullian date is 10 ?

43

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro manual disc master cylinder

« on: February 08, 2008, 05:24:14 PM »

Hey kurt as soon as i get the other info about this new Nov. car i will submit info.  I just remember i got another pic with this setup but your site can't handle the size. This is from a different car too.  And if there is another angle you want let me no. There is another casting mark on the back side that resembles the size of a stick of gum. The side between the engine and M/C.
Charlie

44

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro manual disc master cylinder

« on: February 08, 2008, 01:51:45 PM »

Just to let you no they have rebuild kits for your valve you took off.  If i remember right it was 30 for kit, 70 for if they rebuid it and 100 for new one.

45

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 camaro manual disc master cylinder

« on: February 08, 2008, 01:40:04 PM »

I would say yours probably is 262 for the 262th day of 1966 for your Nov. car.  Casted around the 9th month.
You could try some chalk along bottom too.  But i think with your help this will prove this was used at beginning of production and throught out.  The cars i have seen are later until this last car i just found and it happens to be a Nov. car too.  But really have not done anything with this new found car yet.